Page 1 of 1
almol and faroc [tg]
![Post Post](./styles/prosilver/imageset/icon_post_target.gif)
Posted:
Wed Jun 10, 2015 6:32 am
by notyou2
Accused:
almolfarocThe accused are suspected of:
Being Multis
Comments: Saw them talking in global chat. Clicked on their names and they are both Australian and joined at the exact same time.
Re: almol and faroc [tg]
![Post Post](./styles/prosilver/imageset/icon_post_target.gif)
Posted:
Wed Jun 10, 2015 3:29 pm
by clangfield
notyou2 wrote:Accused:
almolfarocThe accused are suspected of:
Being Multis
Comments: Saw them talking in global chat. Clicked on their names and they are both Australian and joined at the exact same time.
More likely friends or relatives then... do you have any actual evidence from the chat that they are the same (eg giving out the same personal details)? Were they on chat at the same time? That would tend to disprove the multi idea (although it's not impossible).
Re: almol and faroc [tg]
![Post Post](./styles/prosilver/imageset/icon_post_target.gif)
Posted:
Wed Jun 10, 2015 7:45 pm
by notyou2
No, I don't have any evidence. I noticed that they are in their freemium games together and there is a third guy in those games too that joined at the same time.
I felt the hunters should have a look.
Re: almol and faroc [tg]
![Post Post](./styles/prosilver/imageset/icon_post_target.gif)
Posted:
Sat Jun 13, 2015 1:29 am
by TeeGee
They haven't logged back in since signing up and playing a few games with each other. Hard to pin then down as a multi or a group of friends/relatives sitting around a computer playing each other, which by the style of play looks more likely.
However, I am keeping this open and pending in the hopes that they will return and play again so we can make a ruling one way or the other.
Re: almol and faroc [tg]
![Post Post](./styles/prosilver/imageset/icon_post_target.gif)
Posted:
Sun Jun 28, 2015 8:49 pm
by king achilles
Since both of these accounts have not logged in since the 10th of June and it's still unsure if they are the same or not (but more likely not), we'll leave this be.