Page 1 of 1

ntcbadabing and Donald Fung(BG)

PostPosted: Mon Jul 14, 2014 10:53 pm
by bobtheautomator
Accused:

ntcbadabing
Donald Fung




The accused are suspected of:

Being Multis
Conducting Secret Diplomacy




Game number(s): 14388094



Comments: The game log gets a bit convoluted, but it lays out many of the players suspicions. I think it's pretty clear they are working together, they wouldn't attack one another even though they shared multiple borders and conveniently created a truce after being accused of secret diplomacy.

Re: ntcbadabing and Donald Fung

PostPosted: Tue Jul 15, 2014 7:49 am
by iAmCaffeine
bobtheautomator wrote:Accused:

ntcbadabing
Donald Fung




The accused are suspected of:

Being Multis
Conducting Secret Diplomacy




Game number(s): Game 14388094



Comments: The game log gets a bit convoluted, but it lays out many of the players suspicions. I think it's pretty clear they are working together, they wouldn't attack one another even though they shared multiple borders and conveniently created a truce after being accused of secret diplomacy.


Fixed.

They're not multis. This is why diplomacy of any kind is shit.

Re: ntcbadabing and Donald Fung

PostPosted: Wed Jul 16, 2014 12:32 am
by Frox333
they aren't near being multis.

Re: ntcbadabing and Donald Fung

PostPosted: Thu Jul 17, 2014 12:41 am
by bobtheautomator
OK sorry, but secret diplomacy?

Re: ntcbadabing and Donald Fung

PostPosted: Thu Jul 17, 2014 12:58 am
by Frox333
bobtheautomator wrote:OK sorry, but secret diplomacy?


Could be. that's way too much chat for me to sift through at all, but from just looking at the board now it doesn't look like it cause ntc keeps breaking Donald's bonus and not letting him hold it, so how would that be secret diplomacy? Again, I didn't look at the previous areas of the game since its been 50 rounds, but from the looks of it now, it doesn't seem likely. Also, in past game log, they seemed to have a vicious war with each-other. but since you're in the game you would know more. It just doesn't seem likely.

Re: ntcbadabing and Donald Fung(SN)

PostPosted: Sat Jul 19, 2014 11:49 am
by bobtheautomator
You have to see the early rounds, after they were called out they changed their gameplay.

Re: ntcbadabing and Donald Fung(SN)

PostPosted: Wed Jul 23, 2014 10:44 pm
by ntcbadabing
bob... let's talk about you and blue.. you were getting 30+ reinforcements the majority of the game.. you held the middle of the map, blue held a total 6 bonus bordering you directly to your S/E. A 6 bonus v a 30+... and you never hit blue one time. Not once. He held the corner, which most players will go for.. you even let him get to highest troops.. you guys' border max was 17 v 17.. (yellow and I were 65/65).. and then, after all cyans accusations about myself and donald cheating for donald taking advantage of the truce I offered cyan early on (which btw, cyan declined truce offers by both myself and donald) which the truce offer was cyan hold east asia and i would go west.. well, cyan went west, and donald took asia. I never considered donald a threat because he had 2 bonuses, one way east (that cyan let him have) and one way west.. very poor map position.. he needed troops to fight bob (you) since blue never, NEVER did.. then, at the end of the game, blue even stated who couldn't attack bob because of a truce.

NO TRUCE EVER EXISTED IN PUBLIC CHAT BETWEEN YOU TWO.
YOU TWO NEVER ATTACKED EACH OTHER WITH BLUE'S STATED REASON THAT HE COULDN'T ATTACK YOU, MORALLY, BECAUSE OF YOU GUY'S TRUCE.

So I asked for blue to quote you guys truce agreement from the public chat and guess what.. he said oops, you have no truce, then he attacked you, which at this time you were getting 50+ reinf, I got 5 (because blue broke my bonuses) and blue was getting sub 10.

Blue went from highest armies to losing with myself and yellow (donald) breaking your 40-50+ bonuses each round, while blue did nothing.. until.. he went all out on me... claiming he couldn't attack you, because of a non-existent truce.

Explain that.

Re: ntcbadabing and Donald Fung(SN)

PostPosted: Wed Jul 23, 2014 10:49 pm
by ntcbadabing
To everyone else.. Donald and I play teams games... and we haven't done to well with them.. so if you're looking at our history and you see a lot of games, you might want to click the game. It's teams games.. their whole basis of accusing us of cheating is that we play games together, nothing else. Cyan started the accusations, and he was upset because he was about to get knocked out. Blue and bob's strategies, or blue's lack of, is far more suspicious than yellow and I's was in that game.. I don't think they were cheating though, I think blue just sucks at this game.. but I do think it's a bit noobish this jerkoff came here with this bullshit.

Back to bob, f*ck off. Foe you go.

Re: ntcbadabing and Donald Fung(SN)

PostPosted: Mon Jul 28, 2014 3:46 pm
by sniffie
just for the record, is the TS accusing ntcbadabing and Donald Fung of SD??
And If yes, please state evidence for it.

sniff

Re: ntcbadabing and Donald Fung(BG)

PostPosted: Mon Aug 04, 2014 10:47 am
by BGtheBrain
CLEARED

Sniffie is on vacation