Conquer Club

Accused:

Lockup


The accused are suspected of:


Other: Not respecting fog of war rule <Explanation>



Game number(s):

Game 13049790


Comments:

GAME CHAT :

2013-10-16 10:58:21 - courtesykiller: cyan,DII legion is open for you...
2013-10-16 10:59:09 - courtesykiller: that's if you want to put up resistance to the rolling pink war machine?
2013-10-16 13:51:55 - hardraada: thats a roger wilco CK.
2013-10-16 13:55:30 - hardraada: what am I looking at for my target area? North, South Italy? Illyricum? Belgium...?
2013-10-16 13:56:22 - hardraada: it's gonna be a suicide mission if you and Blue and Grey were ready to fill in the gap after I go through...
2013-10-16 15:29:14 - courtesykiller: you'll find pink is halfway across the map so i don't think you'll have any trouble deciding where to go
2013-10-17 08:30:32 - hardraada: I take it he controls all the Blue terts
2013-10-17 09:18:48 - Lockup: He doesn't have EM Augustus, the drop out left them... high value neutrals....
2013-10-17 09:20:45 - Lockup: He has 54 on the West Seat and 22 on SIV, 36 on ITII... 30 combined on Medio+legion... He's grim!!!
2013-10-18 14:08:20 - courtesykiller: here he comes with his 118 on ILII.. good luck pink!
2013-10-20 10:53:39 - Lockup: He's now got 75 on the West seat...
2013-10-20 11:26:16 - GioDuce: what is it with all these numbers ? isn't this supposed to be a fog game...

a couple of questions for you.

1. where in the rules does it state what he is doing was wrong? please provide links.
   
2. how do we know those figures were correct? please provide a snapshot.

I have to say that I'm rather surprised that Gio has decided to report this.
I have often seen information put up in games when uniting against someone who has reached a dominant position, and it has never been complained about, and there is nothing in the rules against it.
It's very unusual for me to even get a bad rating, and this cheeses me off!

Fog of War Games:
Using the game chat to announce where a player's territories and troops may (or may not ) be is NOT against the rules. It may come across as unfair or not in the spirit of the game, but feel free to find strategic applications of this non-rule.

viewtopic.php?f=1&t=7785#p2865163

Alright, i'll leave it for what it is.

Tnx for the response.

Lockup you will get a bad rating from me as i prob get from you.
What you did is just bad sportmanship, i'm not even the strong one in the game.

Yes, you'll leave it for what it is...
An honest player, doing something which is within the rules....
For which, you have decided, you will give a bad rating....
Love the chain of logic....
Frankly, I'd rather bury the hatchet and get on with the game!

Lockup wrote:Yes, you'll leave it for what it is...
An honest player, doing something which is within the rules....
For which, you have decided, you will give a bad rating....
Love the chain of logic....
Frankly, I'd rather bury the hatchet and get on with the game!

Lockup, Gio is correct, it is considered bad sportsmanship and he is well within his rights to rate you accordingly.

for future reference say something like this. "hey guy, look at the logs, Player X is deploying almost what we are combined. if we keep fighting amongst ourselves ......" that information can be seen by everyone

This is not against the rules. This is CLOSED.