nice scott -- using a program [cleared]
Posted: Mon Sep 16, 2013 10:29 pm
Accused:
nice scott
The accused are suspected of:
Other: Using a program, possibly? to start turns simultaneously. Look at the game log for the game number listed below, please.
Game number(s):
Game 13351122
Comments:
I consider it unfair/cheating for several reasons:
1. The opponent's ability to start turns simultaneously with his opponent allows him to recover all bonuses without receiving a blow from the opposing player, then receiving bonuses.
2. If the opponent starts simultaneously, he is almost guaranteed to finish the turn quickly (provided he is attentive) and then gain a dominance over the game in terms of playing turns first.
3. The opponent in question (accused) claims to be busy and unable to start his turns on time, yet he starts his turns within 0-3 seconds every time... with a delay of about a minute or less before he starts playing. I would also consider this "strategy" as cheap play that compromises the designation of the game as "freestyle". Rather, it should be "sequential" to avoid deceiving future opponents.
I welcome any feedback/issues that I may be able to answer.
nice scott
The accused are suspected of:
Other: Using a program, possibly? to start turns simultaneously. Look at the game log for the game number listed below, please.
Game number(s):
Game 13351122
Comments:
I consider it unfair/cheating for several reasons:
1. The opponent's ability to start turns simultaneously with his opponent allows him to recover all bonuses without receiving a blow from the opposing player, then receiving bonuses.
2. If the opponent starts simultaneously, he is almost guaranteed to finish the turn quickly (provided he is attentive) and then gain a dominance over the game in terms of playing turns first.
3. The opponent in question (accused) claims to be busy and unable to start his turns on time, yet he starts his turns within 0-3 seconds every time... with a delay of about a minute or less before he starts playing. I would also consider this "strategy" as cheap play that compromises the designation of the game as "freestyle". Rather, it should be "sequential" to avoid deceiving future opponents.
I welcome any feedback/issues that I may be able to answer.