Page 1 of 1

Nobleman21 - Ratings Abuse [cleared] BG

PostPosted: Mon Apr 29, 2013 8:50 pm
by kuma32478
Accused:

Nobleman21



The accused are suspected of:

Ratings Abuse

Game number(s):

Game 12492427 - He lost and rating his opponent poorly as a result
Game 12406299 - Lost and rating opponent all 3's
Game 12577872 - Rated me all 3's despite me winning

When I asked him about the rating, he replied:

"I give stars on how good of a game is was if is was a medium game then I give three stars. If it was better it gets more. Sorry you don't like my system."

He clearly does not understand the system and as a result is rating everyone based on how he enjoyed the game.


Comments:

Re: Nobleman21 - Ratings Abuse

PostPosted: Mon Apr 29, 2013 10:51 pm
by rishaed
kuma32478 wrote:Accused:

Nobleman21



The accused are suspected of:

Ratings Abuse

Game number(s):

Game 12492427 - He lost and rating his opponent poorly as a result
Game 12406299 - Lost and rating opponent all 3's
Game 12577872 - Rated me all 3's despite me winning

When I asked him about the rating, he replied:

"I give stars on how good of a game is was if is was a medium game then I give three stars. If it was better it gets more. Sorry you don't like my system."

He clearly does not understand the system and as a result is rating everyone based on how he enjoyed the game.


Comments:

A 3 star is average. That and you need 5 examples.

Re: Nobleman21 - Ratings Abuse

PostPosted: Tue Apr 30, 2013 3:22 am
by DJPatrick
Kumar...you won a Doodle assassin game in three rounds...no chat from you nor almost anyone else...over in 3 rounds so you got good dice & or lucky drop and you expect MORE than "average" ratings...maybe it's yourself who doesn't realize what the ratings mean??? That said, I know most pps just give high ratings for the winner in the hope they'll get the same by default for winning... I usually only give ones or five if rating...most time DON'T rate as it's become a bit of a mutual scratch my back system...You would have to prove you were actually above average and five others the same to have any chanc e with this one... :twisted:

Re: Nobleman21 - Ratings Abuse

PostPosted: Tue Apr 30, 2013 5:27 am
by Vartiovuori
kuma32478 wrote:Accused:

Nobleman21



The accused are suspected of:

Ratings Abuse

Game number(s):

Game 12492427 - He lost and rating his opponent poorly as a result
Game 12406299 - Lost and rating opponent all 3's
Game 12577872 - Rated me all 3's despite me winning

When I asked him about the rating, he replied:

"I give stars on how good of a game is was if is was a medium game then I give three stars. If it was better it gets more. Sorry you don't like my system."

He clearly does not understand the system and as a result is rating everyone based on how he enjoyed the game.


Comments:


3 star rating should be the default, NOT 5 stars.

Re: Nobleman21 - Ratings Abuse [cleared] BG

PostPosted: Tue Apr 30, 2013 7:51 am
by BGtheBrain
http://www.conquerclub.com/public.php?m ... tructions5

The number of stars given should be based on this scale: 1 = Bad, 2 = Below Average, 3 = Average, 4 = Above Average, 5 = Excellent.


Nobleman21 has been CLEARED of ratings abuse

Re: Nobleman21 - Ratings Abuse [cleared] BG

PostPosted: Tue Apr 30, 2013 9:25 am
by Symmetry
BGtheBrain wrote:http://www.conquerclub.com/public.php?mode=instructions5

The number of stars given should be based on this scale: 1 = Bad, 2 = Below Average, 3 = Average, 4 = Above Average, 5 = Excellent.


Nobleman21 has been CLEARED of ratings abuse


In reality- 1-3 = terrible, 4 = ok, 5 = good.