Conquer Club

Accused:

nielison
corix




The accused are suspected of:

Being Multis




Game number(s):

Game 12465596
Game 12558093
Game 12558092
Game 12558091


Comments:
In game 12465596 nielison says that it is actually corix making the moves for nielson:
2013-03-25 18:59:00 - nielison: corix for nielison
2013-03-27 20:06:07 - nielison: corix for nielison again
2013-03-28 15:26:36 - droops: I dont understand what corix is
2013-03-30 10:34:46 - nielison: corix is me, the player doing turns for nielison

If corix has played nielison's turns on 25 March and 27 March and 30 March, then I presume that this has also happened in other games.

They are playing as partners in games:
12558093 ~(moves by nielison made on 29 and 31 March).
12558092 ~(moves by nielison made on 28, 29 and 30 March)
12558091 ~(moves by nielison made on 28, 29 and 30 March)

droops wrote:Accused:

nielison
corix




The accused are suspected of:

Being Multis




Game number(s):

Game 12465596
Game 12558093
Game 12558092
Game 12558091


Comments:
In game 12465596 nielison says that it is actually corix making the moves for nielson:
2013-03-25 18:59:00 - nielison: corix for nielison
2013-03-27 20:06:07 - nielison: corix for nielison again
2013-03-28 15:26:36 - droops: I dont understand what corix is
2013-03-30 10:34:46 - nielison: corix is me, the player doing turns for nielison

If corix has played nielison's turns on 25 March and 27 March and 30 March, then I presume that this has also happened in other games.

They are playing as partners in games:
12558093 ~(moves by nielison made on 29 and 31 March).
12558092 ~(moves by nielison made on 28, 29 and 30 March)
12558091 ~(moves by nielison made on 28, 29 and 30 March)

More likely is account sitting, which is ok under the rules if announced.

The point I was trying to make is if it is account sitting, then the last 3 games were started during the account sitting and its one player (corix) making all the moves in games 12558091, 12558092, 12558093. Those games are doubles where corix and nielison are in the same team.

droops wrote:The point I was trying to make is if it is account sitting, then the last 3 games were started during the account sitting and its one player (corix) making all the moves in games 12558091, 12558092, 12558093. Those games are doubles where corix and nielison are in the same team.

I don't really see a problem with that if they're double games and they're on the same team.

Symmetry wrote:

droops wrote:The point I was trying to make is if it is account sitting, then the last 3 games were started during the account sitting and its one player (corix) making all the moves in games 12558091, 12558092, 12558093. Those games are doubles where corix and nielison are in the same team.

I don't really see a problem with that if they're double games and they're on the same team.

I had a dubs partner sit 4 me as well. I let it be known that he was sitting 4 me, and honestly its much better than missing turns all around. Now if the sitter was in the same nonteam game / on a different team in the game one could logically cry foul play.

Cleared of being multis. As what has been mentioned above, this is more like account sitting than being multis.

No. 19 in our FAQs Page:
http://www.conquerclub.com/eticket/index.php