Conquer Club

Accused:

Emmdizzle




The accused are suspected of:


Other: rating abuse



Game number(s):

Game 12338165



Comments: Large doubles game, progressed normally as far as i could tell. Emmdizzle happened to get eliminated first. There was no intentional effort against him, there was not public chat, there were no private alliances. He gave the same rating to 5 people in the game, 1 star, bully, coward, follower. I tired to contact this player to understand the problem because I was confused and they still claim that we all ganged up on them even though that was clearly not the case.

so you guys conducted secret diplomacy in order to eliminate the highest ranked and now you complain because he rated you accordingly?

You need to get proof of 5 unfair ratings left, which in this case would be all in the same game.

Dunno what the mods will do with it and generally it might be that he thought that you guys ganked up on him, so the rating should be kinda legal then caus its his oppinion.

Urs

Koganosi

They only follow up rating abuse if the player does it consistently to many people. Many would usually be way more than five.

There is proof of what you are saying if you go here http://www.conquerclub.com/player.php?m ... =Emmdizzle

but that is not against the rules if he felt that way and has a reason for rating you so poorly. It is unfair to rate all of the 3 aspects as a 1 star because how could he tell your attitude unless you wrote mean things in the chat.

This thread is a blast from the past.

I will take this is just one game where he may have rated with questionable reasons. The other poor ratings from other games looks justified as he appears to be a player who doesn't like people revealing positions, or at least his, when the game is on fog. I'll note this for now.

SaMejoHn wrote:so you guys conducted secret diplomacy in order to eliminate the highest ranked and now you complain because he rated you accordingly?

That's probably what he thought, but it was just an assumption. I never looked at his profile until after i saw the rating, I had no clue who anybody in the game was nor do I care about others rankings. There were no secret alliances of any kind. Before this game I had no idea there were players on this site who think so highly of themselves, that they assume secret diplomacy occurred just because they lost.

Thanks everyone for your input. I didn't expect action, just thought Emmdizzle's total Douchery should be noted.