Conquer Club

These are suspected Multis and/or Secret Alliance

Suspect users: Super Mango & Skittles!

Game number: http://www.conquerclub.com/game.php?game=418218

Comments: These two are doubles teammates and we were playing a sequential game. All of us had about the same amount of armies. If anything I was the weakest. So I broke SuperMango for the first time in the game. So instead of her breaking Skittles who had 2 other territories she went suicide on me. In fact here is her quote:
2007-05-08 05:41:06 - SuperMango: now i'm determined to suicide myself on you

SuperMango has already admitted to having multis before and I do believe she is at it again. Here are links to prior forum discussions about this scumbag.

http://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=13204&highlight=

first of all, we're both guys and we do know eachother.(me and skittles i say)

secondly, skittles has been cleared and I'M A PREMIUM USER.

thirdly, me and you were pretty close in strength. sure i had more bonuses, but i had little armies to protect them. so instead of attacking skittles, who would inevitably take away my bonuses anyways, you take mine and then expect ME to attack skittles the very next turn!

honestly, i just don't like you're playing style. and me and skittle's friendship wasn't involved at all in this game until you decided to claim that we had a secret alliance.

This has already happened before.

1) How could we be multi's when we're in different countries?

2) We're friends. In the game we all attacked each other equally. Because Mango didn't do what your mind wanted him to do, that doesn't mean it's a secret alliance. As I told you before, human's haven't mastered telepathy yet.

3) I think you're not physic anymore, cause you think we're girls. But you got it right about my age in the game-chat.

SuperMango wrote:thirdly, me and you were pretty close in strength. sure i had more bonuses, but i had little armies to protect them. so instead of attacking skittles, who would inevitably take away my bonuses anyways, you take mine and then expect ME to attack skittles the very next turn!

You know you are an idiot. The game we played was sequential. The order was me then you then Skittles. I broke you so you would not get your bonus. Then you should have broken Skittles to stop her bonus. If I would have broken Skittles then you would have gotten your bonus. She would not have had a chance to break yours before you got yours. Is any of this sinking in?

Its obvious you two pieces of shit have pulled this in the past. Perhaps something will be done to prevent your little game you've got going on. Do you girls discuss your alliance on the phone right before bed? My question is this: Who is the butch?

Why don't you understand that I am male and not female?

AGH

dogwillhunt wrote:Do you girls discuss your alliance on the phone right before bed?

Yup, we really talk to each other when we are in different time zones, and not to mention on different sides of the world.

for that last time, we're guys
and secondly, how do i get my bonus if you've already stopped them?
THIRD, and again, i said this all in game chat, how do i stop skittles! if you've taken away my capacity to do that?

and lastly, sequential means nothing. in fact, i think the ideal situation as he was stronger than both of us, is if we both attacked him and then fought eachother after,

dogwillhunt wrote:These are suspected Multis and/or Secret Alliance

Suspect users: Super Mango & Skittles!

Game number: http://www.conquerclub.com/game.php?game=418218

Comments: These two are doubles teammates and we were playing a sequential game. All of us had about the same amount of armies. If anything I was the weakest. So I broke SuperMango for the first time in the game. So instead of her breaking Skittles who had 2 other territories she went suicide on me. In fact here is her quote:
2007-05-08 05:41:06 - SuperMango: now i'm determined to suicide myself on you

SuperMango has already admitted to having multis before and I do believe she is at it again. Here are links to prior forum discussions about this scumbag.

http://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=13204&highlight=

The next time you have a thought...just let it go

dog will hunt, maybe you realise they didn't want to do what you told them they should do?

dogwillhunt wrote:

SuperMango wrote:thirdly, me and you were pretty close in strength. sure i had more bonuses, but i had little armies to protect them. so instead of attacking skittles, who would inevitably take away my bonuses anyways, you take mine and then expect ME to attack skittles the very next turn!

You know you are an idiot. The game we played was sequential. The order was me then you then Skittles. I broke you so you would not get your bonus. Then you should have broken Skittles to stop her bonus. If I would have broken Skittles then you would have gotten your bonus. She would not have had a chance to break yours before you got yours. Is any of this sinking in?

Its obvious you two pieces of shit have pulled this in the past. Perhaps something will be done to prevent your little game you've got going on. Do you girls discuss your alliance on the phone right before bed? My question is this: Who is the butch?

What the f*ck are you smoking? have you been playing idiots the entire time youve been on this site?
how the hell can anyone break somebody's bonus when one- they have none themselves and only receive 3
two- the odds are against you when attacking without a bonus
and three- gotta worry about the guy who just attacked your bonus so you can either receive your bonus once more or at least try to defend yourself

Please grow a brain

DirtyDishSoap wrote:

dogwillhunt wrote:

SuperMango wrote:thirdly, me and you were pretty close in strength. sure i had more bonuses, but i had little armies to protect them. so instead of attacking skittles, who would inevitably take away my bonuses anyways, you take mine and then expect ME to attack skittles the very next turn!

You know you are an idiot. The game we played was sequential. The order was me then you then Skittles. I broke you so you would not get your bonus. Then you should have broken Skittles to stop her bonus. If I would have broken Skittles then you would have gotten your bonus. She would not have had a chance to break yours before you got yours. Is any of this sinking in?

Its obvious you two pieces of shit have pulled this in the past. Perhaps something will be done to prevent your little game you've got going on. Do you girls discuss your alliance on the phone right before bed? My question is this: Who is the butch?

What the f*ck are you smoking? have you been playing idiots the entire time youve been on this site?
how the hell can anyone break somebody's bonus when one- they have none themselves and only receive 3
two- the odds are against you when attacking without a bonus
and three- gotta worry about the guy who just attacked your bonus so you can either receive your bonus once more or at least try to defend yourself

Please grow a brain

So the girls need to bring in help to try to form an intelligent argument. If you were in the game you would know that she had a territory with 8 armies in it right next to where her little buddy was with weak fortification and neglected to attack with it. That was before she received his 3 armies she could have used as well. So she had plenty of opportunity to break her little buddy. I guess this is what happens when I play individuals that have considered inbreeding. If you need help with this subject I would advise seeking help. As the world really doesn't need to support more of your kids in that double-wide. Let alone ones that look like your family.

Now i'll be gone until tomorrow but you two fucks and your army of mentally challenged prospective fluffers keep bumping this topic up. The more views the better girls.

dogwillhunt wrote:

DirtyDishSoap wrote:

dogwillhunt wrote:

SuperMango wrote:thirdly, me and you were pretty close in strength. sure i had more bonuses, but i had little armies to protect them. so instead of attacking skittles, who would inevitably take away my bonuses anyways, you take mine and then expect ME to attack skittles the very next turn!

You know you are an idiot. The game we played was sequential. The order was me then you then Skittles. I broke you so you would not get your bonus. Then you should have broken Skittles to stop her bonus. If I would have broken Skittles then you would have gotten your bonus. She would not have had a chance to break yours before you got yours. Is any of this sinking in?

Its obvious you two pieces of shit have pulled this in the past. Perhaps something will be done to prevent your little game you've got going on. Do you girls discuss your alliance on the phone right before bed? My question is this: Who is the butch?

What the f*ck are you smoking? have you been playing idiots the entire time youve been on this site?
how the hell can anyone break somebody's bonus when one- they have none themselves and only receive 3
two- the odds are against you when attacking without a bonus
and three- gotta worry about the guy who just attacked your bonus so you can either receive your bonus once more or at least try to defend yourself

Please grow a brain

So the girls need to bring in help to try to form an intelligent argument. If you were in the game you would know that she had a territory with 8 armies in it right next to where her little buddy was with weak fortification and neglected to attack with it. That was before she received his 3 armies she could have used as well. So she had plenty of opportunity to break her little buddy. I guess this is what happens when I play individuals that have considered inbreeding. If you need help with this subject I would advise seeking help. As the world really doesn't need to support more of your kids in that double-wide. Let alone ones that look like your family.

Now i'll be gone until tomorrow but you two fucks and your army of mentally challenged prospective fluffers keep bumping this topic up. The more views the better girls.

Stop dissing women. And I'm not a women by the way. Anyway just because they didn't do what you wanted you to do. And please try to have a sane, normal conversation or you might even replace xtra.

yes, i did have 8 armies on one spot, but it was on the other side of the map and you were an easier target, one whom might i mention, i was angry at for taking away my bonuses, yes?

lastly, just because i didn't do what you wanted me to doesn't make us cheaters.

Yup. We're mentally challenged.

That's why you're the one calling us girls.

That's why you don't know it's inter-breeding, not inbreeding.

Also. To the thing with ME having 8 armies. The bonus was already broken. As a high-ranked player, I would of thought that you know that as well as attacking your enemies, you need to defend against them. The 8 was there for defence.

Woot, the 2 fucks and mentally challenged army. ATTACK.

For some reason just thought I would throw in my 2 cents. I can see where Dog is coming from. Two friends playing in singles games can be seen as an alliance/multi. Usually thats why I usually don't. I play doubles with my roomate all the time (Still haven't won ). Never would play singles though.

I can also see where skittles and super are coming from though. You can't attack someone, break their bonus, and then expect them to attack the other guy and not you. If anything a move like that would suggest multi activity.

dogwillhunt wrote:

DirtyDishSoap wrote:

dogwillhunt wrote:

SuperMango wrote:thirdly, me and you were pretty close in strength. sure i had more bonuses, but i had little armies to protect them. so instead of attacking skittles, who would inevitably take away my bonuses anyways, you take mine and then expect ME to attack skittles the very next turn!

You know you are an idiot. The game we played was sequential. The order was me then you then Skittles. I broke you so you would not get your bonus. Then you should have broken Skittles to stop her bonus. If I would have broken Skittles then you would have gotten your bonus. She would not have had a chance to break yours before you got yours. Is any of this sinking in?

Its obvious you two pieces of shit have pulled this in the past. Perhaps something will be done to prevent your little game you've got going on. Do you girls discuss your alliance on the phone right before bed? My question is this: Who is the butch?

What the f*ck are you smoking? have you been playing idiots the entire time youve been on this site?
how the hell can anyone break somebody's bonus when one- they have none themselves and only receive 3
two- the odds are against you when attacking without a bonus
and three- gotta worry about the guy who just attacked your bonus so you can either receive your bonus once more or at least try to defend yourself

Please grow a brain

So the girls need to bring in help to try to form an intelligent argument. If you were in the game you would know that she had a territory with 8 armies in it right next to where her little buddy was with weak fortification and neglected to attack with it. That was before she received his 3 armies she could have used as well. So she had plenty of opportunity to break her little buddy. I guess this is what happens when I play individuals that have considered inbreeding. If you need help with this subject I would advise seeking help. As the world really doesn't need to support more of your kids in that double-wide. Let alone ones that look like your family.

Now i'll be gone until tomorrow but you two fucks and your army of mentally challenged prospective fluffers keep bumping this topic up. The more views the better girls.

what part of "defending your bonus" do you not get?
what do you gain by attacking another persons bonus when you got someone on your back?

gender confused wanker

Page 2! Woo. This is interesting.

Maybe a new xtratabasco will be born.

Let's not begin to think that. And if a new one is born, may your beliefs save us all.

well he is confusing genders......

and players

and clearly rational logic with irrational logic



and a small, rotting peach with a mouse living inside of it, and a brain....which happens to be his own.

Skittles! wrote:Let's not begin to think that. And if a new one is born, may your beliefs save us all.

well xtra is beginnning to quiet down. Take2out has been banned a long time ago. Loosepuppy hasn't posted and isn't in active games. Bigfalcon hasn't posted too much. Where are all the retards gone? Maybe dogwilhunt replace one of them

Wait. Is his brain the small, rotating peach with a rat in it, or is it something different? Like a testicle or a heart or something?

Iliad wrote:

Skittles! wrote:Let's not begin to think that. And if a new one is born, may your beliefs save us all.

well xtra is beginnning to quiet down. Take2out has been banned a long time ago. Loosepuppy hasn't posted and isn't in active games. Bigfalcon hasn't posted too much. Where are all the retards gone? Maybe dogwilhunt replace one of them

or all of em
maybe hes the new super retard

i think i'm giving him quite a bit of credit when i say his brain is a small rotting peach with a mouse living in it.