Page 1 of 1

Mubarak and solarsam secret diplomacy [cleared] BG

PostPosted: Fri Feb 22, 2013 3:52 pm
by delahoc
Accused:

mubarek
solarsam

The accused are suspected of:
Conducting Secret Diplomacy

Game number(s):

Game 12267677

Comments:
For most of the game, certainly for the last four or five rounds, these two payers have not attacked one another, and only attacked me. In addition, I find that solarsam has not been defending his hold on Africa (only 1 on Cairo) - yet despite the fact that he has had over 100 troops on Dubai, mubarek has not attacked Africa, allowing solarsam to keep that bonus.

Under normal circumstances, blue would need to defend his Arica bonus, but he is obviously confident enough that green will not attack that he can leave it completely undefended. That stinks of secret diplomacy to me.

Neither player has spoken in the game chat. I have used the game chat to warn them of my suspicions, but no reply.

That's the only proof I have, but it sounds very suspicious to me. Please investigate.

Re: Mubarak and solarsam, suspected secret diplomacy

PostPosted: Fri Feb 22, 2013 4:03 pm
by Koganosi
Fog mate we cant see anything.

And escalating cashes being worth over 200 troops a 3 bonus decent seem that high valued anymore imo. Might even not atack it myself especially if I get the grudge of a player on me. Its after all a 3 player game wich will net into a loss then. ONly worth it if you need a card. Sadly its fog so I cant see who is the game leader. If its you then I might also let him keep the bonus. Did it a few times myself, no SD just tactics.

Urs

Koganosi

Re: Mubarak and solarsam, suspected secret diplomacy

PostPosted: Fri Feb 22, 2013 5:59 pm
by delahoc
If that's tactics, then it's very poor tactics. Green has nothing to lose. With 100+ in Dubai and only 1 defender in Cairo why wouldn't he take it and kill blue's bonus? I agree, with the spoils in the 100's, what's the value in a 3 troop bonus. But by the same token, why not take it?

Re: Mubarak and solarsam, suspected secret diplomacy

PostPosted: Thu Feb 28, 2013 5:31 pm
by rhp 1
delahoc wrote:If that's tactics, then it's very poor tactics. Green has nothing to lose. With 100+ in Dubai and only 1 defender in Cairo why wouldn't he take it and kill blue's bonus? I agree, with the spoils in the 100's, what's the value in a 3 troop bonus. But by the same token, why not take it?


because a +3 bonus at this point means 0... except that it may mean you'll piss someone off and they will relentlessly attack you... oh wait.. that's what you're crying about.. sorry...

Re: Mubarak and solarsam secret diplomacy [cleared] BG

PostPosted: Wed Mar 06, 2013 2:34 pm
by BGtheBrain
mubarek & solarsam are cleared of secret diplomacy