Conquer Club

PLACE THE NAME OF THE ACCUSED IN THE SUBJECT LINE!!!

Replace or delete any xxxxxxx with the appropriate information.
Delete any accusations or entries which do not apply.

You can upload image attachments to your post by using the 'Upload Attachment' feature below [Preview] and [Submit] buttons.

Be sure before you accuse someone!
</DELETE ME>

Accused:

TGVIKES




The accused are suspected of:


Other: [b]throwing game in favor of other player purposely[/b]



Game number(s):

Game 12076625



Comments: TGVIKES purposely threw the game right at the end when it could have continued, hence giving the game to blue.

Do you have any other examples?

Seeing as red was insulting him , I dont blame green for making sure that he didn't win , perhaps red should realise that diplomacy is part of the game

comic boy wrote:Seeing as red was insulting him , I dont blame green for making sure that he didn't win , perhaps red should realise that diplomacy is part of the game

Aye, in a three player game where one player (green) is consistently on the back foot, it's not a good idea to say:

2012-12-14 21:09:22 - General Sharon: green, u are a f*cking idiot

Symmetry wrote:

comic boy wrote:Seeing as red was insulting him , I dont blame green for making sure that he didn't win , perhaps red should realise that diplomacy is part of the game

Aye, in a three player game where one player (green) is consistently on the back foot, it's not a good idea to say:

2012-12-14 21:09:22 - General Sharon: green, u are a f*cking idiot

Agreed. Looks pretty simple case of I dont care if I win, as long as you don't. Attitude can really do a lot. And I must say, I dont blame him.

Just foe him. And move onnnnnnnn!

Do you have more examples then only this game. Otherwise I'll give him the benefit of the doubt.
If you do not wish to play this person again, foe him. Feel free to rate accordingly.

sniff

I think each 3 player assassin game could end up in a C&A report. they're always unfair!

This one is a funny one. I probably would do the same if you call me a *******!

Urs

Koganosi

okay...you all have decided and i respect your wishes

general sharon

General Sharon wrote:okay...you all have decided and i respect your wishes

general sharon

Well, I and the mod have asked for more examples. From experience, they won't move on something like this if it's a one off, and a pretty ambiguous one. If there's more evidence, that would add weight.

Up to you.

Symmetry wrote:

General Sharon wrote:okay...you all have decided and i respect your wishes

general sharon

Well, I and the mod have asked for more examples. From experience, they won't move on something like this if it's a one off, and a pretty ambiguous one. If there's more evidence, that would add weight.

Up to you.

sniffie wrote:Do you have more examples then only this game. Otherwise I'll give him the benefit of the doubt.
If you do not wish to play this person again, foe him. Feel free to rate accordingly.

sniff

I pretty much wont even look into benefit of doubts. This guy clearly insults him! Would also put me on a bad footing with the guy who would insult me. I think the game is all cool as long as the guy who insulted me doenst win XD!

Urs

Koganosi

I do not see green targeting just one player so he may have his own gameplay in this game. Maybe he was after a bonus area or wanted a bonus zone? It's a 3 player assassin game and we really can't rely on everyone to make "balance" attacks. Someone will get unlucky. One remark in the game chat could also trigger unwanted reactions. This looks like an isolated incident and cleared for me.