Conquer Club

These are suspected Secret Alliance

Suspect users: Scott-Land & KoE_RazorsEdge

Game number: 379324

Comments: Although never officially announcing the pact between colors or in areas on the map, these two moved easily around each other and supported each other to ensure either one or the other would be in the best position to capitalize or threaten other armies. They refered to it as "moral standing" and made nice chit chat while the rest of us tried to play the game. When faced with either fortifying my men (60 armies) or attacking the largest army that had placed itself consistently on my borders, I decided to wipe up Scott-land's army (20 armies) because he continually threatened my army by sourrounding me. Then he complained because I struck first and weakened him...When Scott-land was devastated his buddy cleaned him up took his cards and tried to make a play for the win but they didn't anticipate a third party would get so lucky on the dice or savy in placing his guys to get the victory. When it was over Scott-land continued his poor sportsmanship by carrying on about how I ruined his plan which spilled into my negative feedback. Well excuse me...


~MACEWG[/b]

You fucking idiot- he only swept me cause ya knocked out my large stack of armies. There were no pact or secret alliance. I do believe the object of an escalating game is to maneuver around the board. The reason you were so weak and had no possibilty of winning was your random attacks on everyone. What you did was called a kamikazee. You attacked specifically because you knew full well I was gonna win the game when it was my turn and trying to justify the idiotic move by accusing me of cheating.

Macewg wrote:These are suspected Secret Alliance

Suspect users: Scott-Land & KoE_RazorsEdge

Game number: 379324

Comments: Although never officially announcing the pact between colors or in areas on the map, these two moved easily around each other and supported each other to ensure either one or the other would be in the best position to capilize or threaten other armies. They refered to it as "moral standing" and made nice chit chat while the rest of us tried to play the game. When faced with either fortifying my men or attacking the largest army that had placed itself consistently on my borders I decided to wipe up Scott-land's army because he continually threatened my army by sourrounding me and then he complained because I struck first...When Scott-land was devasted his buddy cleaned him up took his cards and tried to make a play for the win but they didn't anticipate a third party would get so lucky on the dice or savy in placing his guys to get the victory. When it was over Scott-land continued his poor sportsmanship by carrying on about how I ruined his plan. Well excuse me...


~MACEWG[/b]

Your accusations are ludicrous. Scott-Land is a very credible player. You're either a sore loser or just don't know what you're talking about.

Macewg wrote:These are suspected Secret Alliance

Suspect users: Scott-Land & KoE_RazorsEdge

Game number: 379324

Comments: Although never officially announcing the pact between colors or in areas on the map, these two moved easily around each other and supported each other to ensure either one or the other would be in the best position to capilize or threaten other armies. They refered to it as "moral standing" and made nice chit chat while the rest of us tried to play the game. When faced with either fortifying my men or attacking the largest army that had placed itself consistently on my borders I decided to wipe up Scott-land's army because he continually threatened my army by sourrounding me and then he complained because I struck first...When Scott-land was devasted his buddy cleaned him up took his cards and tried to make a play for the win but they didn't anticipate a third party would get so lucky on the dice or savy in placing his guys to get the victory. When it was over Scott-land continued his poor sportsmanship by carrying on about how I ruined his plan. Well excuse me...


~MACEWG[/b]

1- pussy
2- sore loser
3- GFY

What a noob. You're reporting a game where you suicided into another player.. Fuckin idiot

I was done with the game but Scott-land is the pussy that keeps crying about the game like he's never lost before or something...what do you expect if you put yourself in a position like he did where he had most of his guys next to mine where I had the larger army...sorry I'm not in your little "chat live" in crowd. I would consider his opinion if it wasn't filled with holes, especially the part about me expending my guys early on everyone or kamikazing to begin with (the guys shady) after I so called "suicided" I still had 35 guys on my country and he had 1 - that's not a suicide, if anything he committed his own suicide by placing 20 of his armies next to almost 60 of mine - check the log, what the hell are you talking about you fucking dick Scott-land??? Tell more of your cocksuckers to leave you good feedback and defend you, that way we all know who to never play again in Conqer Club especially if its with you and not a team match....

MACEWG

You still suicided because you were annoyed at scott. You forted everything to middle east early-on, leaving alot of 1's. This can explain why you lost so many armies so early on.

When faced with either fortifying my men or attacking the largest army that had placed itself consistently on my borders I decided to wipe up Scott-land's army

Wtf is that? If your army was HUGE, it would have been suicide for scott to attack it. You're a dumbass for starting this thread, it's not doing you any favours.

oh just to make things clearer its not just mace who is a pussy , a sore loser and that u should GFy
also scott so i think u guys are good together i think u would work a couple and plz next time when u want to start a thread like this let it have a meaning u silly crybaby , we all know scott and his constant nagging and strategy discussing through game chat and we all got used to that we dont like it but get used to it
and 1 more thing GFY
I am out
Cheers
Chessplaya

chessplaya wrote:oh just to make things clearer its not just mace who is a pussy , a sore loser and that u should GFy
also scott so i think u guys are good together i think u would work a couple and plz next time when u want to start a thread like this let it have a meaning u silly crybaby , we all know scott and his constant nagging and strategy discussing through game chat and we all got used to that we dont like it but get used to it
and 1 more thing GFY
I am out
Cheers
Chessplaya

Chess, you used 2 commas..... Pls re-punctuate and fill in the "u's" with names.

Macewg wrote: Tell more of your cocksuckers to leave you good feedback and defend you, that way we all know who to never play again in Conqer Club especially if its with you and not a team match....
MACEWG

I'll take my chances of being called one of Scott's cocksuckers!!

Dude, you are a jerk, welcome to my ignore list, although by now you are in so many others that I don't think i'll ever have to play with you.

Scott is one of the best players on this site. Not only strategically, but he always plays a clean game, no cheating, no truces. Being invited to one of his games is an honor; what you call Scott's cocksuckers are all good players that make CC a great community, people like you, and Talapus, if I 'm still allowed to bitch about it, are a HUGE disappointment, accusing people every time things don't work out the way you want.

Grow up!

AM

ABSOLUTE_MASTER wrote:

Macewg wrote: Tell more of your cocksuckers to leave you good feedback and defend you, that way we all know who to never play again in Conqer Club especially if its with you and not a team match....
MACEWG

I'll take my chances of being called one of Scott's cocksuckers!!



AM

oh and BTW Scott didnt push any of us to post in this thread but when u play with Scott he demands ur respect oh scott u fucker

poo-maker wrote:

chessplaya wrote:oh just to make things clearer its not just mace who is a pussy , a sore loser and that u should GFy
also scott so i think u guys are good together i think u would work a couple and plz next time when u want to start a thread like this let it have a meaning u silly crybaby , we all know scott and his constant nagging and strategy discussing through game chat and we all got used to that we dont like it but get used to it
and 1 more thing GFY
I am out
Cheers
Chessplaya

Chess, you used 2 commas..... Pls re-punctuate and fill in the "u's" with names.

Chess?? did you see my post?

chessplaya wrote:

ABSOLUTE_MASTER wrote:

Macewg wrote: Tell more of your cocksuckers to leave you good feedback and defend you, that way we all know who to never play again in Conqer Club especially if its with you and not a team match....
MACEWG

I'll take my chances of being called one of Scott's cocksuckers!!



AM

oh and BTW Scott didnt push any of us to post in this thread but when u play with Scott he demands ur respect oh scott u fucker

I don't find him like that.

Of course being invited to one of his games is an honor for you (you polish knobbs for a living)...believe me, being ignored by CC's "suspected" is fine by me. I don't see why I should have to put up with negative feedback when I'm the one who was willing to let it all go. If what transpired was not a secret alliance then i don't think proving a secret alliance in this club is possible...

MACEWG

Macewg wrote:Of course being invited to one of his games is an honor for you (you polish knobbs for a living)...believe me, being ignored by CC's "suspected" is fine by me. I don't see why I should have to put up with negative feedback when I'm the one who was willing to let it all go. If what transpired was not a secret alliance then i don't think proving a secret alliance in this club is possible...

MACEWG

You sound like a very hurt person. Did I ever get a chance to polish you? You didn't enjoy it? Your attitude makes you sound like a noob, so I can still polish you.

Let me check my game list, if we've ever played together I'll have a way to give you neg!!

[quote Absolute_Master]
Did I ever get a chance to polish you? You didn't enjoy it? Your attitude makes you sound like a noob, so I can still polish you. Let me check my game list, if we've ever played together I'll have a way to give you neg!!end quote Absolute_Master] - yup - one of CC's finest here! Not surprised you are affiliated with cop/scott_land. Please leave me some more negative feedback for no reason like your loser buddy...

Let me give you my address: 121 E. I got yah knobb right herE LN! You've not satisfied me yet, and in time you will come to call me MASTER! oh yeah - in time babe... ~MACEWG

lol

Scott-land wrote:A total paranoid idiot. By randomly attacking everyone in the early rounds, Mace weakened himself to the point of being eliminated. With 3 card cashes he managed to stay in the game although no real threat. In the eleventh round where the cashes were 30 armies, I was in great position to clean the board - he suicides into my biggest army. His explanation was that he didnt want me to win. He said "cool- no more secret invites to setups" - because I didn't attack another player in the early stages he thought we had a secret alliance. Mace is a total paranoid idiot - avoid playing with him.

Macewg wrote: SEE My posting on THE CLUB FORUM FOR Suspected alliances for more details: Read the chat (he had a secret alliance with at least one player teal army -admitted)- check the log, I didn't even make attacks for a couple rounds, and the few times that I did they act like its a mystery -just need a card you tool, The guy needs to get over himself - just a game, for a Colonel to make such a stink is sad - the guys a loser - he made a ranking by fixing games, his friend helped his strategy, and I would recommend avoiding games with this player if you are unfamiliar with him. You lost - get over it - I DID!

You both contradict each other a couple of time. It's obvious that one of you are BSing. Ill check the game log, and i'll find out for myself. Stay tuned

MACY

Your hard efforts are being rewarded... Go to

http://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=17453

poo-maker wrote:

poo-maker wrote:

chessplaya wrote:oh just to make things clearer its not just mace who is a pussy , a sore loser and that u should GFy
also scott so i think u guys are good together i think u would work a couple and plz next time when u want to start a thread like this let it have a meaning u silly crybaby , we all know scott and his constant nagging and strategy discussing through game chat and we all got used to that we dont like it but get used to it
and 1 more thing GFY
I am out
Cheers
Chessplaya

Chess, you used 2 commas..... Pls re-punctuate and fill in the "u's" with names.

Chess?? did you see my post?

I did sorry i used the commas its not me usually i get a little surprise for u in the flame wars section

Does anyone know if someone has ever been taken to the flame wars so quickly?



AM

After looking over the game. I found that Macewg didnt get a card 2 times in a row, i'm not sure if it was to save his own ass or if it was a esc tactic used by many players.

I have also concluded that Mace realised he was playing like a noob during the game. He was very friendly in the chat until he suicided into scott. It looks like a terrible interpretation of the situation and a worse move.

You have anything to object to Mace?

How is my 60 armies attacking his 20 armies a suicide, even KoE admitted I could have still won later in the game (assuming I had a turn in with my 3 cards after scott was eliminated) - it wasn't suicide on my part but possibly on Scott's part for approaching the bigger man in that area. Wiping up Scott's army near me was just a strategy given random placement and turn order. It changed the game, but I took the risk that given the turn order I would have a better chance. In the end, escalating sets is a crapshoot and cop_land I mean scott_Land caused way to much drama and grief, he's a knuckle head for leaving me negative feedback just because he lost. Only one can win, and my other option was to sit there and be wiped up by him - screw that...

MACEWG

Macewg wrote:How is my 60 armies attacking his 20 armies a suicide
MACEWG

It may not have been suicide, but it gave the game away. That deserves a neg.

poo-maker wrote:

Macewg wrote:How is my 60 armies attacking his 20 armies a suicide
MACEWG

It may not have been suicide, but it gave the game away. That deserves a neg.

Great - I'll start being a real sore loser by leaving negative feedback everytime I lose a game and I have someone to blame for causing my ultimate demise. You truly are a poo-maker - that kinda smells funny, I do like your objective approach to the situation, but when it happens to you we'll see if you can share the same sentiments...not surprised it's already happened to you given the company you keep, and I bet you apologized - (when Absolute_Master is done with her job, why don't you stop by ; )

MACEWG

Macewg wrote: but when it happens to you we'll see if you can share the same sentiments...

MACEWG

Haha, It has hapened to me before. I've been on both sides of the argument. In your situation, i apologised. In scott's, I cursed at and verbally attacked the retard that wrecked the game.

The person who plays badly is always in the wrong. The person who loses his head cursing at the person who wrecked the game is even worse. But in my opinion, the worst thing to do in this situation, is to not acknowledge that your moves were stupid and/or that you wrecked the game.