secret deplomacy [cleared] BG

by **King of Lebanon** on Sun Jun 17, 2012 3:53 am

Accused:

pilager
mrhansen
kelson
and maybe gnatblast
The accused are suspected of: if someone go to the map he will be sure that there is a secret diplomacy . its because pilager he dont fortify his troops against mrhansen ad kelson and both of them they dont attack him to reduce his troopos due ( and there is no alliance between us on the game chat ) and i think that maybe other players are with them in this secret diplomacy . go to the map and get an eye on it and you will find that there for sure a big secret deplomacy
Conducting Secret Diplomacy

Game number(s):

Game 11212952

Comments:

by **jgordon1111** on Sun Jun 17, 2012 8:57 am

Game 11212952

fixed link so C&A team could look

Does look a little fishy pink has a whole lot of unprotected borders on different continents,blue is bordering him in NA,silver is bordering him in africa along with green but no attacks to break a damn good bonus. That if any of them were broken this player wouldnt be able to retake them to easy.

orange is in this mix with bonuses that could also be broken but no one is trying on him either.

From that stand point orange is the troop count leader,fear may be holding back attacks on him, but the other stuff looks like something is going on.

by **King of Lebanon** on Sun Jun 17, 2012 9:44 am

but how to stop this unlegal play ?

by **NoSurvivors** on Sun Jun 17, 2012 11:49 am

King of Lebanon wrote:but how to stop this unlegal play ?

The C and A team will have a look, and if they are thought to be cheating, they will be warned, or depending on what the punishment is for secret diplomacy, banned at the most severe.

by **Arc Pro** on Mon Jun 18, 2012 2:31 pm

I have not followed all the game log but i've checked the games they have played together.
It looks weird but there could be logical reasons behind:

1. The accused are in CC for quite a long time. Apparently it is the 1st game that they are playing together and they are not in any clan so they most probably don't know each other.

2. This situation may occur when there are "mutual trust" among neighbors (it could be a gambling but once u trust your neighbors u just fortify your borders as less a possible to avoid him/her from doing the same so that u can focus on other fronts)

3. The accused are not the leading players in the game so there would be no point at attacking each other.

4. RED seems the biggest threat in this game so those guys prefer to stack lot of troops to prevent RED from attacking and expanding on their land thus leaving their other borders free.

If I were one of them, having RED's big stacks/bonus around and seeing that my neighbors aren't willing to attack me, I probably would have done the same just for the sake to survive.
Attacking others would just make me more enemies and help the leader create bigger gap.

by **mrhansen** on Tue Jun 19, 2012 1:39 am

As one of the accused in this game, i can say there is no secret diplomacy going on. If there was, why would i be tying up so many of my forces at my borders with pink?? This guys just pissed off that noone would accept any of his weak ass alliance proposals. (looking at you, King of L)

by **King of Lebanon** on Tue Jun 19, 2012 3:15 am

thx so much arc pro

i was not posting this letter to the conquer club because i was losing the game . but because of the situation that i descriped it on the first post here . arc pro what you are saying is so logical , but the question is : all of the 4 players was thinking as the same way and they decide to not attack each others to dont let red won the game , when red he was not the big player ? but i think that when i was posting a lot to red about alliance and peace between us on the biginning of the game and he have not reply but he have not attacked me by his (estimated) 22 troops , maybe one player of them thinked that there is a secret alliance between me and red maybe orange or pink . and he make secret agreement with other 3 players to be safe and eliminate red ...because i see that after peace between red and me the situation on there territorries was changed from war to peace . anyway maybe i was wrong and maybe not . but sure thx to the conquer management because seeing on this post and surching to resolve this problem , thx arc again

by **Arc Pro** on Tue Jun 19, 2012 5:21 am

This is a no spoils game so it is harder for everyone to fight agaisnt the leading player (RED) in this game alone but it seems that no one is willing to risk troops attacking him either.

1. The weaker ones won't fight against the stronger ones to survive (even though there is only 1troop on their borders)

2. The stronger ones won't fight the weaker ones either for the fear to give away the game to the leading player (even though there is only 1troop on their borders)

3. You should just try to do the same and survive( leaving ur borders free with em to tell them "oh I'm not a threat" and just stack your troops in the middle to tell em "don't come in because I bite".

4. Making more enemies won't help u win this game but lead u to a quick defeat instead.

Goodluck