Page 1 of 1

homelessnimeck Ratings Abuse [cleared] BG

PostPosted: Sun Apr 08, 2012 7:06 pm
by jackal31
Accused: homelessnimeck

The accused are suspected of: Ratings Abuse

Comments: Since I played him and inquired about this at the time he left me abusive ratings, I was told it was noted he was leaving these types of ratings. I have been checking periodically since then and these are the results:

On 3/2/2012 he left Jackal31(4.9) inaccurate ratings and abused his privileges.
On 3/5/2012 he left FernandoRacing(4.7) poor ratings.
On 3/28/2012 he left thenobodies80(4.8.) poor ratings.
And on 4/2/2012 he left Dessie(4.8.) what appears to be inaccurate and abusive ratings.

There are multiple other ratings that appear to be retaliatory ratings only after he lost his games. I asked him about my ratings personally, and he deleted my first two messages without response. On the third and final attempt to reason with him, he responded with a childish response.

Since this player has already been warned, it is quite apparent he has no regard for the system and what it's meant for. I provided the current ratings for the players I've mentioned because I think there is some merit in holding a rating of 4.7 and higher.

Re: homelessnimeck Ratings Abuse....Again

PostPosted: Mon Apr 09, 2012 2:46 am
by sniffie
If the rating abuse is already noted, homelessnimeck will probably be blocked from leaving ratings.

sniffie

Re: homelessnimeck Ratings Abuse [pending] BG

PostPosted: Mon Apr 09, 2012 8:35 am
by BGtheBrain
*****

Re: homelessnimeck Ratings Abuse [pending] BG

PostPosted: Mon Apr 09, 2012 2:29 pm
by jackal31
BGtheBrain wrote:Although you may not agree with the ratings he/she is now leaving, the ratings are much improved over the previous methods.

Users are allowed to leave poor ratings for players if they want. It takes a good number of inappropriate tags and/or blatantly misrating a player.

At this time I do not see enough evidence to say it is in fact ratings abuse.


I am curious to how you conclude with that given the sample size. Just because he is giving 2 and 3 stars doesnt make it right he is giving out any rating at all.

This isnt a counter-argument, but to conclude with your logic isnt logical.