HairyPied - Wizard2010 [cleared] BG

by **Aradhus** on Sun Mar 11, 2012 8:22 pm

HairyPied
Wizard2010

The accused are suspected of:

Conducting Secret Diplomacy

Game number(s):

Game 9637504
Game 10067091
Game 10359169
Game 10466511
Game 10743138
Game 10758748

Comments: 8 games together, at least 1 of them has been victorious in 6 of them.
Their behaviour in this game Game 10763747 was suspect, basically rarely attacking each other, and when they did attack if was completely harmless.
I mentioned about some comments on the wall of Hairypied that seemed incriminating. He then deleted his wall comments. Unfortunately I only got a screencap of 1 page:

by **Wizard2010** on Sun Mar 11, 2012 9:08 pm

glad to see the plaintiff man-up and take his blowhard charge to the forum. This all began in the game today that didn't go his way. Now he sees a conspiracy.

I will readily admit to playing multiple games with Hairypied - huge number in fact....6. Although I believe there are hundreds more I have played multiple games with who seem to go unnoticed by the venerable author.

Glad to see the plaintiff has a spine. He sure didn't demonstrate it during our spirited game.

by **MNDuke** on Sun Mar 11, 2012 9:30 pm

Wizard2010 wrote:glad to see the plaintiff man-up and take his blowhard charge to the forum. This all began in the game today that didn't go his way. Now he sees a conspiracy.

I will readily admit to playing multiple games with Hairypied - huge number in fact....6. Although I believe there are hundreds more I have played multiple games with who seem to go unnoticed by the venerable author.

Glad to see the plaintiff has a spine. He sure didn't demonstrate it during our spirited game.

Quit baiting and offer some supporting evidence rather than inflammatory remarks. It doesn't do much to vindicate you.

by **Wizard2010** on Sun Mar 11, 2012 11:53 pm

I'm the one being charged Duke.... I'm saying the charge is ridiculous. Do I need to prove a negative?

by **sniffie** on Mon Mar 12, 2012 5:49 am

I checked the games and must admit that it is quite odd that both players always manage to secure the objective on the map if they win.

sniffie

by **DJPatrick** on Mon Mar 12, 2012 7:08 am

Well agree with Wizard,,,why the f should he "vindicate" himself...if the O;p has real proof then he needs to provide it...otherwise his sour grapes just come across a :twisted:

s hemaroids?

by **eddie2** on Mon Mar 12, 2012 7:26 pm

if you are going to throw the game let me know in advance bud...

i hate to say it but that says it all it is a diplomatic discussion about him playing or not so should of been in game chat.. but this comment needs to be paired off with a game. see if he was deadbeating

Aradhus wrote:
Comments: 8 games together, at least 1 of them has been victorious in 6 of them.

as for you have played with him 8 times rofl yep that must be secret diplomacy. serious how the hell can he do such a thing he has played 1700 games and has the nerve to play the same player 8 times.. i think he should be hung drawn and quartered for that by itself.

by **Aradhus** on Mon Mar 12, 2012 8:04 pm

eddie2 wrote:
Aradhus wrote:
Comments: 8 games together, at least 1 of them has been victorious in 6 of them.

as for you have played with him 8 times rofl yep that must be secret diplomacy. serious how the hell can he do such a thing he has played 1700 games and has the nerve to play the same player 8 times.. i think he should be hung drawn and quartered for that by itself.

MOD EDIT