Conquer Club

Accused: Gwaahjo

The accused are suspected of:

Other: Ratings Abuse

Game number(s):

Game 10657338: Lost the game and gave bigg chief ratings of 1.
Game 10636608: Lost the game and gave chapcrap ratings of 1.
Game 10616174: Lost the game and gave chapcrap and tbayjosh ratings of 1.
Game 10562899: Lost the game and gave morff69 ratings of 1.
Game 10628946: Lost the game and gave General Brock II ratings of 1.
Game 10623881: Lost the game and gave Nexxus ratings of 1.
Game 10612726: Lost the game and gave dreddingius ratings of 1.

Comments: There are more examples of this, but basically, this guy is just a sore loser with a bad attitude.

Almost the entirety of the ratings I give are 5 stars -- the games where people talk shit, rely completely on luck, suicide, hold me hostage, or play stupid and get rewarded get lower -- i'd say 90% of the people get 5 stars so I don't see how i'm abusing within my own justifications.

I find this all amusing, he says we play by luck, and yet he is playing manual freestyle where the entire focus is to hit the other guys stack first... Ummm Duhhhhhhh, you do it too! lol

Gwaahjo wrote:Almost the entirety of the ratings I give are 5 stars -- the games where people talk shit, rely completely on luck, suicide, hold me hostage, or play stupid and get rewarded get lower -- i'd say 90% of the people get 5 stars so I don't see how i'm abusing within my own justifications.

Ratings are seperated into 3 different categories.

FAIR PLAY:
GAME PLAY:
ATTITUDE:

They each represent different aspects.
By giving 1 star fair play you are basically saying that someone is cheating.
1 star game play is basically saying that someone just flat out don't know how to play.

Myself and many others reserve 1 stars each category for deadbeats and multi's. I and others also deduct stars for missed turns. Miss 2 turns - lose at least 2 stars. etc...

Looking at the rating you gave chapcrap and tbay josh. 2 sequential 4player dubs games. (tbayjosh was chaps pard in one of them)... You lost both games. The only thing in chat is good game pleasantries... You don't win in 6 rounds playing stupid... No hostage holding... They are vindictive rating and nothing else.

He gave the clapper011 all ones after losing to her and was mean in chat to this nice lady.http://www.conquerclub.com/game.php?game=10658557

Yeah if someone attacks 20with8and wins I consider that playing stupid and getting bailed out.

4.1 ratings don't happen by accident people.

Neither do people posting on boards that don't concern them. = no lives.

Gwaahjo wrote:Neither do people posting on boards that don't concern them. = no lives.

Excellent comeback! Got more like this?

Maybe CC needs a "Lucky" tag for people like this individual. If someone decides to take a RISK attack a 20 with 8 armies, and they win, that's called getting lucky, not being a bad player. If the dice are going to give it to you, then you take it.

Haha he gave me all ones too, though I also gave him all ones. His game relies totally on his speed and luck, he moves very quickly and goes for your stack on manual. Without the speed he's average (and rude).

Most of my games are not stack-based so if you took the time to actually check you'd know that -- I wonder who relies more on luck to win -- the person with 62% wins or 34% wins.

Don't let facts get in the way of your pathetic lives. I also will play anyone of any score and join their games all the time -- Not sitting around farming newbs in quads and triples like the "elite."

Edit: Funny how all the roaches crawling out of the walls are on my foe list already. Everyone loves to be heard. Keep squealing, rodents.

Gwaahjo wrote:Most of my games are not stack-based so if you took the time to actually check you'd know that -- I wonder who relies more on luck to win -- the person with 62% wins or 34% wins.

Don't let facts get in the way of your pathetic lives. I also will play anyone of any score and join their games all the time -- Not sitting around farming newbs in quads and triples like the "elite."

Edit: Funny how all the roaches crawling out of the walls are on my foe list already. Everyone loves to be heard. Keep squealing, rodents.

The player with much 1v1 games.

Gwaahjo wrote:Most of my games are not stack-based so if you took the time to actually check you'd know that -- I wonder who relies more on luck to win -- the person with 62% wins or 34% wins.

Win percentage is irrelevant, not everyone plays the same settings as you. Consider a person who only plays 8 player games with a 40% win rate to a person who only plays 2 player games with a 45% win percentage to understand that.

Don't let facts get in the way of your pathetic lives. I also will play anyone of any score and join their games all the time -- Not sitting around farming newbs in quads and triples like the "elite."

Edit: Funny how all the roaches crawling out of the walls are on my foe list already. Everyone loves to be heard. Keep squealing, rodents.

If you will play anyone then why do you have a foe list? You only foed me after I beat you.

Calling people "rodents", saying people have "pathetic lives" isn't going to go in your favour here. Deliberately winding people up is a total waste of time.

We beat him twice , I believe and he gave me all 1s,I don't really give it to much stock, but than I looked and my partner hmsps ,recieved no rating ,well I only scrolled dwn his 1st pg,but makes me wonder as well, how he comes up with this formula , for his ratings

Gwaahjo has been WARNED for Ratings Abuse.

he rated myself a 1 all around too for winning

clapper011 wrote::lol: he rated myself a 1 all around too for winning

that was proberly just the shock because you actually won