Conquer Club

IR1SH ACE


Accused:

IR1SH ACE
xxxxxxx
xxxxxxx



The accused are suspected of:

Other: <Explanation>
I am reporting this for a guy that i have played with on here before. Your site had booted him for an accusation from this guy, He asked me through email to check through the games in the topic and from what i could see all games had a truce written out on the chat which in return takes away any accusation of secret diplomacy, Any games i played with the players in question (jbudnick2001, Ares88) they both played fair and by the rules. Yet this player IR1SH ACE Who from what i can see only accused them because he was losing the game in progress #10568823, has no real evidence against either party other then the fact that they enjoy playing games together, So in defense of jbudnick2001, Ares88 i believe the other party IR1SH ACE should be inactivated as well for making false accusations and ruining the game for two people who just enjoyed playing with each other and/or stated in each game that was in question there was a truce involved.

Game number(s):

Game 10568823
[game]xxxxxxx[/game]
[game]xxxxxxx[/game]
[game]xxxxxxx[/game]


Comments: Only comments i have are in the above statements which i believe are enough said. Please do something about this culprit who ruined a game for two players that only wanted to play on your site and obviously did not break ANY rules are suggested from this vindictive player IR1SH ACE.

may i also add from my statement above from looking at their recent games together. seems as if in singles games they played around 14 together yet either only won 7 out of 14? if two people are forming secret diplomacy in a singles game then the likely hood of them only winning 7 outta 14 is very slim. it would be more like 12-14. Each person won 3-4 games outta 14. In my mind those arent very good odds and i do not know how you could inactivate them over winning about 20% of their games. Doesnt seem like much a threat to me.

Really?
You have played 6 games all of which include the 2 players that you are trying to defend its quite possible that you are another multi of theirs that just slipped through the cracks

of course i am going to play games with them, i won what 3 out of 5? in my mind playing the same people and winning 60% of the games is a good strategy. Is it not?

LOL ES, one of you guys going to check this player out? Odd that you play a couple of games on this site and become such buddies you then share email addresses. Dude you should have said something like hey we are buddies from school or work. But hey maybe you did swap email addresses, your friends probably didnt get booted for not SD or multi whichever it was for no legit reason, Ace usually know what he is talking about and does alot of research himself before he brings any evidence forward. on a serious note if your on the up and up GL.

There is nothing wrong in what IRISH ACE did. He thought they were multi's, and the Multi Hunters thought so too. If your friends want to appeal the bust, have them file an e-Ticket. If we followed your logic, ANY person that ever filed a C&A report that was cleared, and had to be guested, this site would be dead.

Closed

nice my first C&A report against me.....I musted have missed you in the OP........jbudnick2001 & Ares88....possible Multis 6 games played and all with the accused players.

and they got kicked out for been Multis and not for the SD....to be honest I thought the Multi thing was a long shot and assumed that maybe they where collage room-mates or something like that which would mean they share the same internet connection..

and I told both players in the game we where in that I had opened a C&A report and gave them a link...

show: game chat

they (or I should say jbudnick2001) had a lot to say in chat but did not seem to want to come into the report and defend themselves....

so be honest man....all three of you are either the same person or you are all collage buddies living together.....