ISN2 wrote:betiko wrote:what i don't like about the farming rule, is that it's basically just for money. the site doesn't care at all about what people think is an abuse. they just don't want "?"players to get ass kicked on their first games so they come back and eventually become premium, at least this is how i interpretate this.
I think they should just create a sort of "noob instructor" status for all of those who want to play low ranks/new recruits and farm their points. the counterpart would be the obligation to teach them stuff, like general lee does.
let's say it's ok to do this, if you systematically teach noobs and make them want to play some more.
I see no diference between playin a "?" or a private, apart from economical reasons for the site.
otherwise, people are welcome to use this method if they think they can get +200 per day. if they care about how other people get their points that much, well then I guess they are concerned about their own points.
as bogan says, just lose 2/15 games and you will see what happens to your score. just curious, as everyone is always saying that they can become conqueror in weeks; why are the top 3 players always the same since monthes?
please random cc player; for scientific cc purposes, can you start doing it, open a thread and update us about your skyrocketing points? we can give you the time you want to become conqueror and prove that what you say is right.
I guess someone already mentioned a good example:
Gen.LeeGettinhed, a total of 1533, 81% of win using same dirty method as
King_Herpes and has 4700+ points, isn't it enough for you?
i mention GLG as well in the post you are quoting, and you don't get my point. there are always some C&A reports about low ranked farmers, each time with people saying that if it's accepted, well they can just start doing it as well and become conqueror in a short time. I'm just encouraging anyone saying this to step up and prove what it s right. is the point loss in stake worth it?
it's like if you make a bet; you go for the favorite or the underdog.
let's say you play a favorite with a 1.05 odds because it seems impossible he doesn't win. is it worth it? are you going to make a lot of money on it? you need to repeatedly bet the same thing and win each time, and you will lose so easily all your earnings by doing one single mistake.
if you bet for the underdog, with let's say a 7.00 odd you just need to win one 2 out of 7 to make money.
the points system makes you choose whatever method you want, and it takes different type of skills. the path chosen by herpes and GLG is the one of constance and patience. not anyone could make it, that's why I invite people to go for it at tell us how it goes for them.