Conquer Club

Posted: **Wed Nov 30, 2011 8:06 pm**

Accused:
Austin Powell

The accused are suspected of:
Ratings Abuse

Game number(s):

JL327 - 1/1/1
JL327 won all three of these games, Austin Powell gave him 1/1/1 rating.
Game 10142453

Game Chat - 10142453 wrote:2011-11-23 22:33:18 - JL327: wow thats gotta be the worst luck I've ever seen
2011-11-23 22:45:40 - JL327: gg

Game 10113722

Game Chat - 10113722 wrote:2011-11-18 23:28:58 - JL327: holy shit
2011-11-18 23:29:04 - JL327: good roll
2011-11-18 23:29:44 - JL327: … unfortunately for me

Game 10113659
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TheGeneral2112 - 1/1/1 - Tags: Rude, Irrational, Sore Loser, Cheap Tactics
I lost this game, but reported Austin Powell for holding me hostage. He rated me vindictively. The chat below started after he wouldn't finish the game.
Game 10144839

Game Chat - wrote:2011-11-24 11:32:39 - TheGeneral2112: Stop attacking neutrals and finish the game.
2011-11-24 11:33:25 - Austin Powell: f*ck yourself
2011-11-24 11:33:42 - Austin Powell: I do what I want when I want
2011-11-24 11:36:58 - Austin Powell: and and guess what CORPORAL.... go f*ck yourself!!!!! LOL HAHAHA
2011-11-24 11:37:59 - TheGeneral2112: I'm taking screenshots and will be reporting if you don't end this.
2011-11-24 11:39:43 - Austin Powell: hahahaha. oooooooo IM SCARED!!!!
2011-11-24 11:43:36 - Austin Powell: MR 1.0 rating!!! LOL so let me get this straight....you are going to take your corporal name and your POOR rating....and REPORT ME?!?!?! Because i have good stradegy? Is that gonna be your basis?? LOL
2011-11-24 11:49:46 - TheGeneral2112: You had better finish this turn, or else...
2011-11-24 11:50:02 - Austin Powell: LOL nope
2011-11-24 11:51:44 - Austin Powell: hmmmm what you gonna do?
2011-11-24 11:52:09 - TheGeneral2112: viewtopic.php?f=5&t=158212&p=3469414#p3469414
2011-11-24 11:55:28 - TheGeneral2112: You seem strangely silent after I posted that... Odd...
2011-11-24 11:55:46 - TheGeneral2112: Guess you'll be finishing up now.
2011-11-24 11:55:49 - TheGeneral2112:
2011-11-24 11:56:27 - Austin Powell: I replied to it.
2011-11-24 11:56:38 - Austin Powell: Not finished
2011-11-24 11:57:05 - Austin Powell: LOL SEriously dude.... dont tell me what to do. I dont care.
2011-11-24 12:00:17 - TheGeneral2112: Next time you play, don't attack neutrals, finish the game.
2011-11-24 12:00:31 - TheGeneral2112: And finish the game this turn. Don't make me wait any longer

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
MoonChild - 1/1/1 - Tags: Cheap Tactics, Poor Strategy
MoonChild won all three of these games, Austin Powell gave him 1/1/1 rating.
Game 9977438

Game Chat - 9977438 wrote:2011-10-26 08:12:17 - Moonchild: gg mate

Game 9819587
Game 9819591

Game Chat - 9819591 wrote:2011-09-27 07:55:22 - Moonchild: gg

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
He also used tags for other players including backstabber, cheap tactics, and the like for 1v1 regular games. Not sure how this is possible.

Posted: **Fri Dec 02, 2011 12:09 am**

I only see a couple really questionable ratings - Moon child and JL327 and we all have some questionable ratings. There is no where near enough examples to be considered punishable ratings abuse.

This reminds me of a saying about glass houses... You rated Austin all 1's AND tagged him as sore loser. HE BEAT YOU. That is a mis use of a tag and quite frankly whatever you think of his attitude I'm sure his 15 rounds of game play deserved more than 1 star like yours did too.

Posted: **Fri Dec 02, 2011 12:27 pm**

jefjef wrote:I only see a couple really questionable ratings - Moon child and JL327 and we all have some questionable ratings. There is no where near enough examples to be considered punishable ratings abuse.

This reminds me of a saying about glass houses... You rated Austin all 1's AND tagged him as sore loser. HE BEAT YOU. That is a mis use of a tag and quite frankly whatever you think of his attitude I'm sure his 15 rounds of game play deserved more than 1 star like yours did too.

Sore loser was a mistag. 1/1/1 rating was not.

Posted: **Fri Dec 02, 2011 1:38 pm**

TheGeneral2112 wrote:
jefjef wrote:I only see a couple really questionable ratings - Moon child and JL327 and we all have some questionable ratings. There is no where near enough examples to be considered punishable ratings abuse.

This reminds me of a saying about glass houses... You rated Austin all 1's AND tagged him as sore loser. HE BEAT YOU. That is a mis use of a tag and quite frankly whatever you think of his attitude I'm sure his 15 rounds of game play deserved more than 1 star like yours did too.

Sore loser was a mistag. 1/1/1 rating was not.

Do you realize that each category is it's own separate rating?

Fair Play - 1 star is indicates he grossly cheated.
Game Play - 1 star indicates that he played horribly. Basically deadbeated.
Attitude - 1 star indicates that that he had a sewage attitude.

Did he cheat? Play unfairly? Was his game play as bad as it could be?

Posted: **Fri Dec 02, 2011 4:28 pm**

Why don't you look up the game. Also feel free to look at the C&A report filled about the game. Then look at his comments in the C&A thread as well. Then come back here and try to spew your bullsh*t towards a player that cares to hear.

Posted: **Fri Dec 02, 2011 5:19 pm**

jefjef wrote:
TheGeneral2112 wrote:
jefjef wrote:I only see a couple really questionable ratings - Moon child and JL327 and we all have some questionable ratings. There is no where near enough examples to be considered punishable ratings abuse.

This reminds me of a saying about glass houses... You rated Austin all 1's AND tagged him as sore loser. HE BEAT YOU. That is a mis use of a tag and quite frankly whatever you think of his attitude I'm sure his 15 rounds of game play deserved more than 1 star like yours did too.

Sore loser was a mistag. 1/1/1 rating was not.

Do you realize that each category is it's own separate rating?

Fair Play - 1 star is indicates he grossly cheated.
Game Play - 1 star indicates that he played horribly. Basically deadbeated.
Attitude - 1 star indicates that that he had a sewage attitude.

Did he cheat? Play unfairly? Was his game play as bad as it could be?

Well, according to the rules:
Fair play is just for backstabbing and sorts
Gameplay is for how much fun is was to play the game
Attitude is for language.

But I rate those things just as you, just being the smart ass.
Yup, they're talking about 'Covers strategy, diplomacy, teamwork, etc..' too in gameplay, but just don read that, they always say the 1ste line is the most important, do they? (they don't, as far as I know)

Posted: **Fri Dec 09, 2011 1:15 am**

Austin Powell = Noted of ratings abuse.

This isn't a case of Ratings Abuse nor is it an example of it.
There are some ratings given that might not be 100% correct, but it ISN'T consistent...
Not keen on the 1/1/1 stars...

Conquer Club

Austin Powell - Ratings Abuse [Noted] KRK

Austin Powell - Ratings Abuse [Noted] KRK

Re: Austin Powell - Ratings Abuse

Re: Austin Powell - Ratings Abuse

Re: Austin Powell - Ratings Abuse

Re: Austin Powell - Ratings Abuse

Re: Austin Powell - Ratings Abuse

Re: Austin Powell - Ratings Abuse [Noted] KRK