Moderators: Multi Hunters, Cheating/Abuse Team
caymanmew wrote:i don't care who i play
sundance123 wrote:caymanmew wrote:i don't care who i play
This is a lie because you foed me when I joined five of your games (way back when you were a sargeant).
But I believe you not cheating, your style of play suggests you are taking advantage of the unholy trinity of game settings manual, fog, freestyle for an easy objective win.
No surprise you 'love' these game settings.
caymanmew wrote:not that nukes change the game as it is normally over before 5th card)
chapcrap wrote:caymanmew wrote:not that nukes change the game as it is normally over before 5th card)
Not true. If you are winning that quickly, then you must only be playing people who have no dice.
caymanmew wrote:chapcrap wrote:caymanmew wrote:not that nukes change the game as it is normally over before 5th card)
Not true. If you are winning that quickly, then you must only be playing people who have no dice.
yes true...you would not know though as you have not played many games on there
drunkmonkey wrote:I'm filing a C&A report right now. Its nice because they have a drop-down for "jefjef".
chapcrap wrote:caymanmew wrote:chapcrap wrote:caymanmew wrote:not that nukes change the game as it is normally over before 5th card)
Not true. If you are winning that quickly, then you must only be playing people who have no dice.
yes true...you would not know though as you have not played many games on there
31=not many
danfrank wrote:this is funny , attack the one because you can.... But when four players colonel or better set up a quads game and low low ranks join.. What would YOU call that
drunkmonkey wrote:I'm filing a C&A report right now. Its nice because they have a drop-down for "jefjef".
cookie0117 wrote:Im reading these posts and am unsure of a few things:
If you enjoy a map and settings and the main sign up is new recruits, at what point is it considered farming?
If you make 100 games and 70 are joined by new recruits (just picking arbitary numbers out of the air) are you then to impose a self ban on that map and settings for a period of time, or ever?
Or do you invite higher ranks to bring your % ranks more even?
If you are good at a map and confident you will win then would inviting high ranked players be considered farming?
How can you personally police who joins?
Gillipig wrote:cookie0117 wrote:Im reading these posts and am unsure of a few things:
If you enjoy a map and settings and the main sign up is new recruits, at what point is it considered farming?
If you make 100 games and 70 are joined by new recruits (just picking arbitary numbers out of the air) are you then to impose a self ban on that map and settings for a period of time, or ever?
Or do you invite higher ranks to bring your % ranks more even?
If you are good at a map and confident you will win then would inviting high ranked players be considered farming?
How can you personally police who joins?
This case deals with the same question. viewtopic.php?f=239&t=155503&start=45
Pedro Nunez got noted and he was far less guilty of farming than caymanmew is. It is considered farming if you mostly play newbies. Even if they join your games. I was at first surprised at this but it makes sense.
jefjef wrote:danfrank wrote:this is funny , attack the one because you can.... But when four players colonel or better set up a quads game and low low ranks join.. What would YOU call that
There is a difference between low rank and no rank. Also when a players games are almost exclusively a single map that is filled almost exclusively by new recruits there is definitely something questionable going on...
He has 97 active games - 77 of them are 2010 cup games - 63 of them are against ?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users