Page 1 of 1

Gibbyrfc[CLOSED]ES

PostPosted: Fri Sep 23, 2011 10:16 am
by Riskmaster101
I'm not completely sure if you can really stop this.. but gibby wrote a really abusive post on my wall after I did basically nothing wrong in this game 9797997. I'm not completely sure why he couldn't have sent me a pm or a less-abusive post explaining his side. I've noticed that he has been abusive to alot of people in alot of games and I would like it to stop. Please let me know if you can do anything about this.

-Thanks Risk

Re: Gibbyrfc

PostPosted: Fri Sep 23, 2011 10:35 am
by trinicardinal
Apparently winning is cheating now... anyway I think your best bet is probably to just ignore him and rate accordingly. FAMO is also an option... but I'd just go with rate appropriately and move on.

Re: Gibbyrfc

PostPosted: Fri Sep 23, 2011 12:20 pm
by MoB Deadly
That is an awesome game number

Re: Gibbyrfc

PostPosted: Fri Sep 23, 2011 12:34 pm
by gibbyrfc
it has nothing to do with him winning or losing,

it has to do with him constantly attacking his assassin on the 1st turn of assassin games,

it is not only just me who has noted this, at least 3other players feel the same!

i admit i over react at times and yes this was one of them, but when players attack you in an assassin and your are theirs it makes your blood boil.

I Appologize for the rant though.

Re: Gibbyrfc

PostPosted: Fri Sep 23, 2011 12:54 pm
by jammyjames
He won the game did he not?

Therefore his tactic can be deemed as good? I do not blame him for weakening his assassin, gives him a better shot if his target isn't the most skilled player :)

Re: Gibbyrfc

PostPosted: Fri Sep 23, 2011 1:10 pm
by Riskmaster101
If I won.. then my tactic should have no reason to draw such an abusive wall post

Re: Gibbyrfc

PostPosted: Fri Sep 23, 2011 1:58 pm
by Mizz_Natz
I actually agree with gibbyrfc, i had you in an assassin game and you took 5 terrs from me, hittin 1 is ok but 5 was out of order...fair enough you did win yea but it was a very close call coz you both had cards and the other guy was slower than you, but you hittin 5 of my terrs did really annoy me too. but if your target was to hit you in an assassin game you wouldnt like it atall.

Re: Gibbyrfc

PostPosted: Fri Sep 23, 2011 2:23 pm
by dr.lucas
Mizz_Natz wrote:I actually agree with gibbyrfc, i had you in an assassin game and you took 5 terrs from me, hittin 1 is ok but 5 was out of order...fair enough you did win yea but it was a very close call coz you both had cards and the other guy was slower than you, but you hittin 5 of my terrs did really annoy me too. but if your target was to hit you in an assassin game you wouldnt like it atall.


so by your logic if I play a game with you and my tactics are sound enough that I win you have the right to post this on my wall:

foed. learn to f*****g play you wee retard. assassin means attack that little red fucking target and when your my target and you attack me in turn 1 it means one of two things, your a retarded prick, or 2 cheating scum. in your case both!!!! FOED FOR LIFE!!!!!

Re: Gibbyrfc

PostPosted: Fri Sep 23, 2011 3:31 pm
by jammyjames
Absolutely nothing wrong with this case, Gibby's language was uncalled for - sour grapes spring to mind.

Re: Gibbyrfc

PostPosted: Fri Sep 23, 2011 3:43 pm
by chapcrap
I also don't see anything wrong in the game strategy. It may not be your strategy or my strategy or even the best strategy, but he wasn't trying to throw the game. He was putting himself in a better position to win by weakening the one player who was intent on taking him out. A strategy that has reason and logic, even if it may not be the most effective. However, in this game, it was the most effective.

And language isn't a cheat/abuse issue. If you have a problem there, you just have to foe the player and move on.

Re: Gibbyrfc

PostPosted: Fri Sep 23, 2011 4:46 pm
by hmsps
i dont often play assassin games myself but when i have played, you usually know early on who is after you so as well as looking at your target, its a good tactic to keep an eye on the person chasing you. I wouldnt weaken them too much as thats a bit too risky tho

Re: Gibbyrfc

PostPosted: Sat Sep 24, 2011 8:55 am
by dr.lucas
chapcrap wrote:And language isn't a cheat/abuse issue. If you have a problem there, you just have to foe the player and move on.


How is what was posted on his wall not abusive?

Re: Gibbyrfc

PostPosted: Sat Sep 24, 2011 11:08 am
by gibbyrfc
i have appologized,

for the record,

i had some seriously bad news before the game, it doesn't excuse my attitude but it is a genuine reason for it,

and for all those who like to add their 2pennies, i posted it during the first turn before anything in the game had been decided and not after it as some think,

anyway, i said sorry and i'm moving on, anyone else who posts in here that isn't Risk or a mod are wasting their time.

Re: Gibbyrfc

PostPosted: Sat Sep 24, 2011 1:58 pm
by chapcrap
dr.lucas wrote:
chapcrap wrote:And language isn't a cheat/abuse issue. If you have a problem there, you just have to foe the player and move on.


How is what was posted on his wall not abusive?

I haven't seen what is posted on his wall. I'm not saying my opinion. I'm saying the rules of the site.

Re: Gibbyrfc

PostPosted: Sun Sep 25, 2011 11:22 am
by Riskmaster101
dr.lucas wrote:
chapcrap wrote:And language isn't a cheat/abuse issue. If you have a problem there, you just have to foe the player and move on.


How is what was posted on his wall not abusive?


I found it abusive.. thus I posted it on here.

Re: Gibbyrfc

PostPosted: Sun Sep 25, 2011 12:13 pm
by dr.lucas
gibbyrfc wrote:anyone else who posts in here that isn't Risk or a mod are wasting their time.


So why do you spend time posting in other threads in this forum? Do you like wasting your time?

Re: Gibbyrfc

PostPosted: Tue Sep 27, 2011 3:09 pm
by Evil Semp
i am glad this got worked out. We don't actively game chat. You have the ability to filter this out and we encourage you to use the Foe option. With the Foe option you won't be able to read any of his game chats and he won't be able to join any games that you have already joined.

As far as the tactic being cheap. I don't think so. If he can keep his assassin from killing him and succeed in killing his target than how can that be a cheap tactic? It also makes his assassin have to worry about getting to weak.

I am going to mark this CLOSED.