Moderators: Multi Hunters, Cheating/Abuse Team
king sam wrote:No you are right, that is against the rules here.
All chat pertaining to gameplay shall be done in the game chat area of that game. Anything other then that is a violation of the rules. They will either get a Block from playing together in the future or a Warning. Either way it was a good call bringing it to their attention.
KS
king sam wrote:No you are right, that is against the rules here.
All chat pertaining to gameplay shall be done in the game chat area of that game. Anything other then that is a violation of the rules. They will either get a Block from playing together in the future or a Warning. Either way it was a good call bringing it to their attention.
KS
Dako wrote:king sam wrote:No you are right, that is against the rules here.
All chat pertaining to gameplay shall be done in the game chat area of that game. Anything other then that is a violation of the rules. They will either get a Block from playing together in the future or a Warning. Either way it was a good call bringing it to their attention.
KS
Is this something new? I haven't seen this rule - where did you get it from? Sounds very intriguing to me.
SirSebstar wrote:player A&B getting blocked if only A did something wrong is still okay. You cannot blokc one player in the equation... And a warning is not a problem, of they dont ever do it again. If A did something and B did not, but B gets the warning and later also makes an SD he should have considered himself warned and is thus rightly going to get punished...
Sword Master wrote:So if one of my opponents communicates strategy through my wall and someone see it and we both get a warning and then later another person does it and it gets reported I'll get banned even though I haven't answered any of them back ? Isn't there anything I can do to avoid getting warned/banned (if twice) like reporting him when he posts it on my wall and thereby actively taking a stance against it?
Isn't that like punishing both the bully and bullied in stead of just the bully ?
Dako wrote:Ok, my bad. Somehow I thought gameplay includes game strategy as well, now I see KS was talking about diplomacy as well. Seeing ghosts in the shadows, got to head home soon :p.
SirSebstar wrote:Dako wrote:Ok, my bad. Somehow I thought gameplay includes game strategy as well, now I see KS was talking about diplomacy as well. Seeing ghosts in the shadows, got to head home soon :p.
Gameplay DOES include strategy as a diplomatic NO/NO. With the provision that others then in the game may give you gameadvice (e.g. SOC gives advice via the forums)
In a 1 vs 1 i can give you advice against myself, but who sais my advice is any good? (not an SD)
in teamgames, teammembers may communicate in any way with eachother. ( not an sd.)
in multi player games vs all you must conclude everything in the gamechat, when it is aimed at your fellow players. Making a comment to your clanmember, who is not in the game, about that idiot mve is NOT an sd..
Sword Master wrote:SirSebstar wrote:Dako wrote:Ok, my bad. Somehow I thought gameplay includes game strategy as well, now I see KS was talking about diplomacy as well. Seeing ghosts in the shadows, got to head home soon :p.
Gameplay DOES include strategy as a diplomatic NO/NO. With the provision that others then in the game may give you gameadvice (e.g. SOC gives advice via the forums)
In a 1 vs 1 i can give you advice against myself, but who sais my advice is any good? (not an SD)
in teamgames, teammembers may communicate in any way with eachother. ( not an sd.)
in multi player games vs all you must conclude everything in the gamechat, when it is aimed at your fellow players. Making a comment to your clanmember, who is not in the game, about that idiot mve is NOT an sd..
So I can post a comment on my teammates wall about strategy in a specific game without doing anything wrong? I didn't know that!
drunkmonkey wrote:I'm filing a C&A report right now. Its nice because they have a drop-down for "jefjef".
jefjef wrote:Sword Master wrote:SirSebstar wrote:Dako wrote:Ok, my bad. Somehow I thought gameplay includes game strategy as well, now I see KS was talking about diplomacy as well. Seeing ghosts in the shadows, got to head home soon :p.
Gameplay DOES include strategy as a diplomatic NO/NO. With the provision that others then in the game may give you gameadvice (e.g. SOC gives advice via the forums)
In a 1 vs 1 i can give you advice against myself, but who sais my advice is any good? (not an SD)
in teamgames, teammembers may communicate in any way with eachother. ( not an sd.)
in multi player games vs all you must conclude everything in the gamechat, when it is aimed at your fellow players. Making a comment to your clanmember, who is not in the game, about that idiot mve is NOT an sd..
So I can post a comment on my teammates wall about strategy in a specific game without doing anything wrong? I didn't know that!
You may communicate with your actual team game partners whichever way you may chose. Wall - pm - forum - phone - craigs list....
You may only communicate with opponents about truces/strategy in an ongoing game in game chat.
Army of GOD wrote:jefjef wrote:Sword Master wrote:SirSebstar wrote:Dako wrote:Ok, my bad. Somehow I thought gameplay includes game strategy as well, now I see KS was talking about diplomacy as well. Seeing ghosts in the shadows, got to head home soon :p.
Gameplay DOES include strategy as a diplomatic NO/NO. With the provision that others then in the game may give you gameadvice (e.g. SOC gives advice via the forums)
In a 1 vs 1 i can give you advice against myself, but who sais my advice is any good? (not an SD)
in teamgames, teammembers may communicate in any way with eachother. ( not an sd.)
in multi player games vs all you must conclude everything in the gamechat, when it is aimed at your fellow players. Making a comment to your clanmember, who is not in the game, about that idiot mve is NOT an sd..
So I can post a comment on my teammates wall about strategy in a specific game without doing anything wrong? I didn't know that!
You may communicate with your actual team game partners whichever way you may chose. Wall - pm - forum - phone - craigs list....
You may only communicate with opponents about truces/strategy in an ongoing game in game chat.
When jefjef and I play together, this is the preferred system of communication.
drunkmonkey wrote:I'm filing a C&A report right now. Its nice because they have a drop-down for "jefjef".
jefjef wrote:You may communicate with your actual team game partners whichever way you may chose. Wall - pm - forum - phone - craigs list....
gradybridges,
A friendly reminder from your cheating & abuse moderator for Conquer Club.
Game number:Game 8704503
Your wall posts on _HiTMaN_ have come to my attention.
You wrote:
done. I forted you heavy in one area. there should be no deffense where you will attack. by gradybridges on Fri Mar 18, 2011 4:27 pm
This is considered Secret Diplomacy and isn't tolerated in Conquer Club. If I had caught you in a non-team format (meaning doubles and you are on the same team as _HiTMaN_) you both would have a warning on your accounts. If another Secret Diplomacy infraction occurs in the future, you will receive an official warning. I am letting this one go without an official warning.
All current game communication must occur in the current game chat. Diplomacy includes, but is not limited to: proposing truces, negotiating alliances, and coordinating assaults. You can post on each other's wall "check game chat on game XXXXXXX".
If you have any questions regarding this communication to you, please reply back with your questions.
Thank you,
KRK
You are coordinating assaults between you and your teammate that should take place in the game chat. It should not take place between you and your teammates wall.
This email is not an official warning, just a reminder to keep your communications in the game chat.
jakewilliams wrote:That's a total fuckup by KRK, you did not break any rules there.
gradybridges wrote:jefjef wrote:You may communicate with your actual team game partners whichever way you may chose. Wall - pm - forum - phone - craigs list....
I was in a random tourney/random formay torney and was with a doubles partner I never had before and I got this pmgradybridges,
A friendly reminder from your cheating & abuse moderator for Conquer Club.
Game number:Game 8704503
Your wall posts on _HiTMaN_ have come to my attention.
You wrote:
done. I forted you heavy in one area. there should be no deffense where you will attack. by gradybridges on Fri Mar 18, 2011 4:27 pm
This is considered Secret Diplomacy and isn't tolerated in Conquer Club. If I had caught you in a non-team format (meaning doubles and you are on the same team as _HiTMaN_) you both would have a warning on your accounts. If another Secret Diplomacy infraction occurs in the future, you will receive an official warning. I am letting this one go without an official warning.
All current game communication must occur in the current game chat. Diplomacy includes, but is not limited to: proposing truces, negotiating alliances, and coordinating assaults. You can post on each other's wall "check game chat on game XXXXXXX".
If you have any questions regarding this communication to you, please reply back with your questions.
Thank you,
KRK
I asked him explain how talking to my partner was secret diplomacy. Got thisYou are coordinating assaults between you and your teammate that should take place in the game chat. It should not take place between you and your teammates wall.
This email is not an official warning, just a reminder to keep your communications in the game chat.
I chalk it up to being new but it still makes no sense.
owenshooter wrote:so wait... now i have to post all my team chat within the game chat log or i am cheating? ok... that makes absolutely no sense... so label me a cheat...-the black cheater
donkeymile wrote:Maybe its just me but I see NO PROBLEM with what was written on the wall of the initial post of this thread.
There was no specific information given and was really just a general strategy hint. Can't see why its garnered so much attention really ....
support81ghent wrote:donkeymile wrote:Maybe its just me but I see NO PROBLEM with what was written on the wall of the initial post of this thread.
There was no specific information given and was really just a general strategy hint. Can't see why its garnered so much attention really ....
+1 there was no cooperation, they didnt give out game information, they didnt have a diplomacy
(as far as we can see).
Users browsing this forum: No registered users