For "rating abuse" (something I don't believe exists fyi) usually the mods want you to provide 5 examples and explain why they are abuse.
yobo was rated all 1-stars for Quick, Complainer, Sore Loser, Clueless
In
Game 4775605:
2009-04-28 11:27:24 - yobo: bull fucking shit
That's something that absolutely would have earned full 1-stars from me.
The_Dayman was rated all 1-stars for Rude, Complainer, Quitter, Poor Strategy
In
Game 57129822009-10-07 10:38:28 - The_Dayman: haha
2009-10-07 10:38:30 - The_Dayman: lucky faggot
I believe that language is a violation, regardless, very worthy of all 1-stars.
Also in
Game 64943502010-02-19 13:10:29 - The_Dayman: lol
2010-02-19 13:12:23 - The_Dayman: hahahaha
2010-02-19 13:12:25 - The_Dayman: what a fucking joke
2010-02-19 13:12:38 - The_Dayman: enjoy waiting, lucky fucking faggot
Accompanied by:
2010-02-19 13:30:45 - The_Dayman was kicked out for missing too many turns
b00060 was rated all 1-stars for Slow, Clueless, Cheap Tactics, Poor Strategy
In
Game 8805106Slow: 2011-04-01 12:26:12 - b00060 ran out of time
Clueless: 2011-04-01 12:17:00 - b00060: tahnsk for fucking around the last thjree rounds and draggingthis out
Cheap Tactics: 2011-04-01 12:21:50 - Mark The Gambler: you use computer speed to win
Poor Strategy: b00060 lost the game, which is justification for that tag under any circumstance at the discretion of any other player
The "Cheap Tactics" tag is probably unjustified, but the rating is, as in my opinion any time someone brings profanity into chat they are crossing a line with certain people who may not want to be exposed to that.
I'm down to see 5 examples of bad ratings, but they all look justified to me.