Page 1 of 1

TexRitter71 & drama.lover.610 [Busted] KS

PostPosted: Tue Apr 19, 2011 8:13 pm
by VicFontaine
Accused:

drama.lover.610
TexRitter71

The accused are suspected of:

Being Multis
Conducting Secret Diplomacy

Game number(s):

Game 8916033

Re: TexRitter71 & drama.lover.610

PostPosted: Tue Apr 19, 2011 9:51 pm
by Caymanmew
can you explain why you think this is a multi/SD? if you do it will help a lot

Re: TexRitter71 & drama.lover.610

PostPosted: Tue Apr 19, 2011 11:26 pm
by VicFontaine
1) Relatively close join-Conquer-Club dates
2) Virtually no communication between the two of them, short of a FIRST ROUND, before anything had happened, "Hey let's truce against VicFontaine until he's dead." The other player didn't respond.
3) Until I was dead, they never attacked each other.
4) When I attempted to call them out and get some response, I got, um...some words from one of them.
5) No other responses.

Just very bizarre behavior from two people, one of whom hadn't even completed 5 games, and the other who was clearly a noob.

That's it.

Re: TexRitter71 & drama.lover.610

PostPosted: Wed Apr 20, 2011 8:32 am
by king sam
pending.


KS

Re: TexRitter71 & drama.lover.610

PostPosted: Wed Apr 20, 2011 12:30 pm
by TexRitter71
caymanmew wrote:can you explain why you think this is a multi/SD? if you do it will help a lot


yeah i just joined about a week ago and i got on this game the chat from drama said do i want to elim the other player i thought since it was in the open to the chat room it was legal

Re: TexRitter71 & drama.lover.610

PostPosted: Wed Apr 20, 2011 12:36 pm
by TexRitter71
If i Broke the rules i apologize but first i will say this

1 join times were recent. who cares,
2 neither attacked each other when playing the game. i am new i just got my first rating today, and drama. lover is the same level as me, would it not be allowed for to new players to eliminate the best and fight at their own level, it isnt fair that people with that level of play can play with newbies. so for VicFontaine to be mad at to Privates ganging up on him is NOOBISH and Stupid.


Texritter71

Re: TexRitter71 & drama.lover.610 [pending] KS

PostPosted: Wed Apr 20, 2011 1:12 pm
by TexRitter71
‹Evil Semp› As long as all discussions about truces and alliances are in game chat there is nothing wrong

this is what the one of the mods said about this WHOLE Thing

Re: TexRitter71 & drama.lover.610 [pending] KS

PostPosted: Thu Apr 21, 2011 12:55 am
by king sam
TexRitter71 wrote:‹Evil Semp› As long as all discussions about truces and alliances are in game chat there is nothing wrong

this is what the one of the mods said about this WHOLE Thing


Tex where are you pulling this quote from Evil Semp from? I would like to know the reference

Re: TexRitter71 & drama.lover.610 [pending] KS

PostPosted: Thu Apr 21, 2011 3:07 am
by Masli
they talked in live chat

Re: TexRitter71 & drama.lover.610 [pending] KS

PostPosted: Thu Apr 21, 2011 8:18 am
by drama.lover.610
Masli wrote:they talked in live chat

Does this mean that we are found "not guilty" of all charges? Thank you so much! How would I press charges on VicFontaine for abuse? I don't want a bunch of other people to have to go through what I just did! Thanks again!

Re: TexRitter71 & drama.lover.610 [pending] KS

PostPosted: Thu Apr 21, 2011 1:42 pm
by king sam
TexRitter71 wrote:‹Evil Semp› As long as all discussions about truces and alliances are in game chat there is nothing wrong

this is what the one of the mods said about this WHOLE Thing


aright for clarification, quoting a part of a text without the rest of the context is just like mis-quoting. Yes the statement you have excerpted from ES is true, discussions on truces need to be in open chat, any other means is SD. However, blindly offering truces with people that you know in games to help sway the victory in one of your favors is a from of cheating. It is SD, cause you entered the game with the intention of throwing the game one way or the other.

If anyone needs further clarification, feel free to ask or PM.

Regardless, dramlover no need to worry about filing charges against someone else for bringing up a legit claim. He brought it up cause it had merit, and after some investigation evidence showed that their were facts to his thought process. These 2 are Busted as multis.

KS