blkWIDOW and biggz[cleared]es
Posted: Wed Feb 16, 2011 6:00 pmConquer Club
Conquer Club, a free online multiplayer variation of a popular world domination board game.
https://rc.conquerclub.com/forum/
blkWIDOW and biggz[cleared]es
https://rc.conquerclub.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=239&t=138240
Page 1 of 1
Posted: Wed Feb 16, 2011 6:00 pmRe: blkWIDOW and biggz
Posted: Wed Feb 16, 2011 6:12 pmthey cant be multis, there flags are different.
Re: blkWIDOW and biggz
Posted: Wed Feb 16, 2011 6:12 pmYou may want to add evidence as to why you think they are multi's.
Re: blkWIDOW and biggz
Posted: Wed Feb 16, 2011 8:32 pm40kguy wrote:they cant be multis, there flags are different.
Some proxies can change that, I'm sure.
-rd
Re: blkWIDOW and biggz
Posted: Wed Feb 16, 2011 8:36 pmrdsrds2120 wrote:40kguy wrote:they cant be multis, there flags are different.
Some proxies can change that, I'm sure.
-rd
lackattack wrote:Proxy Blocking
After studying web proxy use for several months we've discovered that much less than 1% of our membership visits Conquer Club through web proxies and a large portion of this proxy use is by members with multiple accounts. We decided to block access to Conquer Club through web proxies to help our multi hunters enforce the rules and keep out the bad guys.
Re: blkWIDOW and biggz
Posted: Wed Feb 16, 2011 8:56 pmTheForgivenOne wrote:rdsrds2120 wrote:40kguy wrote:they cant be multis, there flags are different.
Some proxies can change that, I'm sure.
-rdlackattack wrote:Proxy Blocking
After studying web proxy use for several months we've discovered that much less than 1% of our membership visits Conquer Club through web proxies and a large portion of this proxy use is by members with multiple accounts. We decided to block access to Conquer Club through web proxies to help our multi hunters enforce the rules and keep out the bad guys.
i win
Re: blkWIDOW and biggz
Posted: Wed Feb 16, 2011 9:06 pmSo, as I thought, proxies can change the flag, but I was unaware lack blocked proxy access. We learn something new every day! Now, back to the original topic, they did go a while without attacking any major bonus of the other, but they did attack others. They might have had secret diplomacy via PM. It's a little leery. That's also their only game together, so diplomacy would be much more likely than multiism.
-rd
-rd
Re: blkWIDOW and biggz
Posted: Thu Feb 17, 2011 10:38 amI'm sorry if i stated something that isn't true. However their turns are dodgy. Especially the turn after which i immediately posted this topic. They moved very quickly after eachother, and i didn't post this simply because they attacked me, they do attack each other. However it seems to be a team up.
Re: blkWIDOW and biggz
Posted: Thu Feb 17, 2011 10:52 amspincr wrote:I'm sorry if i stated something that isn't true. However their turns are dodgy. Especially the turn after which i immediately posted this topic. They moved very quickly after eachother, and i didn't post this simply because they attacked me, they do attack each other. However it seems to be a team up.
If you think that it's "team up" then why not adjust your accusation to reflect that and add some evidence that leads to that suspicion. Statements like "their turns are dodgy" do not qualify as evidence.
Re: blkWIDOW and biggz
Posted: Thu Feb 17, 2011 11:03 amblkWIDOW and biggs are CLEARED of being multi's.