Page 1 of 1
rcgsrep, jdbenz[cleared]es
Posted:
Wed Feb 09, 2011 5:01 pm
by oliverseeley
Accused:
jdbenz
rcgsrep
The accused are suspected of:
Conducting Secret Diplomacy
Game number(s):
8483492
Comments:
In game 8483492 the gameplay of both jdbenz & rcgsrep was consistent with that of secret diplomacy.
In game chat he even admits it.
If you check their game history they've played a lot of games together
Re: rcgsrep, jdbenz
Posted:
Wed Feb 09, 2011 5:54 pm
by TheForgivenOne
oliverseeley wrote:Accused:
jdbenzrcgsrepThe accused are suspected of:
Conducting Secret Diplomacy
Game number(s):
Game 8483492Comments:
In game 8483492 the gameplay of both jdbenz & rcgsrep was consistent with that of secret diplomacy.
In game chat he even admits it.
If you check their game history they've played a lot of games together
Fixed links
2011-02-09 14:59:59 - jdbenz: nice budddy system we have huh?
Re: rcgsrep, jdbenz
Posted:
Wed Feb 09, 2011 9:44 pm
by Evil Semp
You accused these guys of suspicious play after only one round of attacks and I didn't see it. I don't really see the game play that is "consistent with secret diplomacy." As far as the comment in game chat I think he was playing on your thoughts that just because they play some games together that it is suspicious.
rcgsrep and jdbenz are CLEARED.
Re: rcgsrep, jdbenz[cleared]es
Posted:
Thu Feb 10, 2011 2:07 am
by oliverseeley
I'm sorry, perhaps it isn't clear from the game report. But in a 3 player game one knows when the other two are deliberately avoiding attacking each other. In this game blue allowed green to hold America in consecutive rounds while he had the ability to to break him. Green did the same. Two buddies playing together making sure one of them wins.
Re: rcgsrep, jdbenz[cleared]es
Posted:
Thu Feb 10, 2011 6:37 am
by oliverseeley
I did not accuse them of suspicious play after 1 round. I said it was suspicious that they had played so many so many games together. The play was suspicious later when they stopped breaking one another when they had the chance.