Conquer Club

Accused:

PEPELJUGA



The accused are suspected of:

RATINGS ABUSE

Game number(s):

8275405

Comments:

this clown gave me one star ratings throughout - totally unjustified and clearly sour grapes.
Would appreciate this being rescinded as he has no basis at all for rating me like this.

SIGMA3 wrote:Accused:

PEPELJUGA



The accused are suspected of:

RATINGS ABUSE

Game number(s):

Game 8275405

Comments:

this clown gave me one star ratings throughout - totally unjustified and clearly sour grapes.
Would appreciate this being rescinded as he has no basis at all for rating me like this.

fixed links

IIRC, ratings abuse means giving EVERYONE 1's, (or IMO giving EVERYONE 5's). If he only rated you like that, I don't see any abuse.

yep,not see problem here- you have players who foe every player who defeated hem,but these is not foe abuse. Best solution its to foe these players,and move on.

OH RIGHT - ITS NOT AN ABUSE TO RATE SOMONE UNFAIRLY WITHOUT FOUNDATION - WHAT A GREAT IDEA. WELL DONE ................

SIGMA3 wrote:OH RIGHT - ITS NOT AN ABUSE TO RATE SOMONE UNFAIRLY WITHOUT FOUNDATION - WHAT A GREAT IDEA. WELL DONE ................

(Quote is about half way down the link...http://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=7785)

[quote="Night Strike"]

Ratings Abuse

If you are found guilty of Ratings Abuse---that is, rating your opponents unjustifiably, haphazardly, and systematically in a destructive or inappropriate manner (such as repeatedly giving out inaccurate ratings without evidence to justify your ratings), you will find yourself escalating on Ratings Vacation scale.

Ratings Abuse Infraction levels are as follows:
1. Warning
2. 1 Month Ratings Vacation
3. Permanent Ratings Vacation

[/quote]

The way the rules are written its stated that it has to be an "abuse" of the ratings system, which gives an example of "repeatedly" giving out inaccurate ratings. Though the way its worded could be used to argue either way, because before that it says rating opponents unjustifiably...tho again, its pluralized.

The problem here is the guy rarely rates anyone, he's rated two people. One 5 stars one 1 star. I dont see any reason for the one star unless you pm'd him

IcePack

SIGMA3 wrote:OH RIGHT - ITS NOT AN ABUSE TO RATE SOMONE UNFAIRLY WITHOUT FOUNDATION - WHAT A GREAT IDEA. WELL DONE ................

I can certainly see why someone would be swayed to your side of the argument, given your lovely disposition and excellent use of the diplomatic tongue. Well done on putting everyone against you.

In other words what some are trying to tell you here, is that you need to have some validity behind your claim..

Please provide the evidence in your logic as to why this is abuse. This forum isnt intended for witch hunts, you can just point at another member and select a violation to throw at them without having a proper explanation as to why your accusing them of that.

Research the meaning behind what is and isnt ratings abuse, provide your insight on why this was abuse in this case and this will get reviewed by a mod.

KS

Any unfair ratings will be averaged out by all the fair ones over time. At least you got pepeljuga busted with zligor and anka.