Conquer Club

Pirlo and Violet
PLACE THE NAME OF THE ACCUSED IN THE SUBJECT LINE!!!

Replace or delete any xxxxxxx with the appropriate information.
Delete any accusations or entries which do not apply.

Be sure before you accuse someone!


Accused:

Pirlo
Violet
xxxxxxx



The accused are suspected of:


Other: Violet needed to leave the game! Pirlo "got" her password to play as her for the rest of the game... He announced it in chat that he was doing this so its not so much of a problem but it is fishy!


Game number(s):

7979473



Comments:

TotoroHat wrote:Accused:

Pirlo
Vioiet

The accused are suspected of:


Other: Vioiet needed to leave the game! Pirlo "got" her password to play as her for the rest of the game... He announced it in chat that he was doing this so its not so much of a problem but it is fishy!


Game number(s):

Game 7979473

FIXED


Mods, please note the name is vioiet not violet.

thanks 4 the fix... i do not post often!

I personally know they aren't multis- but I am not sure whether that is so rule abiding or not. Might want to check if they've done that multiple times for terms of strategy gain, which is illegal.

-rd

rdsrds2120 wrote:I personally know they aren't multis- but I am not sure whether that is so rule abiding or not. Might want to check if they've done that multiple times for terms of strategy gain, which is illegal.

-rd

it is sequential, how could it be a strategy gain? please explain this...-the black jesus

I thought that that teammates were allowed to sit for their partner, but you weren't allowed to sit for someone on the opposite team, or in the same standard game as you (Not team game)

That was always my knowledge.

they are allowed to sit for eachother.
Only thing that is not allowed is when they are playing against eachother

owenshooter wrote:

rdsrds2120 wrote:I personally know they aren't multis- but I am not sure whether that is so rule abiding or not. Might want to check if they've done that multiple times for terms of strategy gain, which is illegal.

-rd

it is sequential, how could it be a strategy gain? please explain this...-the black jesus

If I get into a game I do not know... then ask my partner to take the move for me since they know the map.. that could be abuse. Proving that is really hard.

Uhmmm? You can talk strategy anyway? You can even take it to the next level and specify exactly what needs to be done (when to stop attacking, where to fort, etc etc). I dont see any problem here.

owenshooter wrote:

rdsrds2120 wrote:I personally know they aren't multis- but I am not sure whether that is so rule abiding or not. Might want to check if they've done that multiple times for terms of strategy gain, which is illegal.

-rd

it is sequential, how could it be a strategy gain? please explain this...-the black jesus

It's a strategy gain exactly like all those turns you have me sit your doodle games cuz the map confuses you.

There is no sitting rules violation here. The sitter also was honorable enough to announce it.

owenshooter wrote:

rdsrds2120 wrote:I personally know they aren't multis- but I am not sure whether that is so rule abiding or not. Might want to check if they've done that multiple times for terms of strategy gain, which is illegal.

-rd

it is sequential, how could it be a strategy gain? please explain this...-the black jesus

The better of the two players takes the turn so there is less chance for error on one players fault. This would be better exampled with a High Rank combined with a cook where the high rank only took the turns - to try to better ensure victory.

You are allowed to sit for your partner...within reason. If your partner is MIA or won't be able to take their turns, that's fine - if you have one player orchestrating a doubles game while the other play is still around but chooses not to play in the game due to lack of knowledge of the maps, settings, etc, then it is for strategic gain.

-rd

Bruceswar wrote:

owenshooter wrote:

rdsrds2120 wrote:I personally know they aren't multis- but I am not sure whether that is so rule abiding or not. Might want to check if they've done that multiple times for terms of strategy gain, which is illegal.

-rd

it is sequential, how could it be a strategy gain? please explain this...-the black jesus

If I get into a game I do not know... then ask my partner to take the move for me since they know the map.. that could be abuse. Proving that is really hard.

I dont know, if I took your turns, I think a clear advantage would be pretty obvious.

You are allowed to take your partners turn as long as it isn't excessive. This is CLEARED.