Conquer Club

Accused : Cryinlion
Accused : yadayada



The accused are suspected of:

Being Multis
Conducting Secret Diplomacy




Game number(s):

http://www.conquerclub.com/game.php?game=7866021



Comments:I suspect cryinlion and yadayada of either being multis or of secret diplomacy.

We played a 3 way ffa, after hitting start I realized that they play all their games together. Round 1, I placed all my troops in N. America, won the bonus, but cryinlion broke the bonus and took europe, oceania and africa. Yadayada played last, took S. America, didn't break any of Cryinlion's bonuses, but attacked me in Mexico, where I had stored all my troops.

jcore75 wrote:Accused :
Cryinlion
yadayada



The accused are suspected of:

Being Multis
Conducting Secret Diplomacy




Game number(s):

Game 7866021



Comments:I suspect cryinlion and yadayada of either being multis or of secret diplomacy.

We played a 3 way ffa, after hitting start I realized that they play all their games together. Round 1, I placed all my troops in N. America, won the bonus, but cryinlion broke the bonus and took europe, oceania and africa. Yadayada played last, took S. America, didn't break any of Cryinlion's bonuses, but attacked me in Mexico, where I had stored all my troops.

Fixed links

Let's see... No wall posts, no game chat posts besides a meaningless one from cryinlion, cryinlion takes a ton of territories from you right off the bat and take little from yadayada, yadayada has yet to attack cryinlion, their accounts were made 3 months apart... Seems like we have Secret Diplomacy, at least.

-Sully

There isnt enough as of yet to say if they are multis or not. But I do see enough to warrent a block of the two players.

Still pending on the multi issue.

eye84free wrote:There isnt enough as of yet to say if they are multis or not. But I do see enough to warrent a block of the two players.

Still pending on the multi issue.

I appreciate the reply. In my opinion they don't appear to be multi's, but rather friends who set up a 3 way ffa game with every intent to work together to get rid of the third player (in this case me) then determine the winner once they're dealt with. If you look at their game 7847801 they pulled a very similar scheme.

Regardless of your ultimate decision, I appreciate the consideration. I would certainly warn anyone about playing as a 3rd in a ffa game format with them. I'm mostly disappointed with myself, since I would normally check player's game history in that format and would not have played against them, seeing all the games that they've played together in the past.

Based of what I can see I dont see enough to say they are multis. They are prob friends or something like that. So for now cleared of being multis but blocked