Conquer Club

Posted: **Sat Sep 25, 2010 10:28 pm**

Secret Alliance

Secret Alliance

Deregulater
Anthony12

The accused are suspected of:
Secret Alliance

Game number(s):

Game 7695022

Comments: I didnt understood the strategy of Degulater but most of all of Anthony12 who had played on Degulator´s favor. When green Anthony12 started the game tried to get ausy instead SA but however he took the option and thats it.
Red had the opportunity to hit ( twice ) green- break his bonus and take a wipe on him out but he didn’t also. Useless hits on each other.
They have been in alliance, but have not stated it in game chat.
Thank you in advance for all the good things you guys are teaching me.

Posted: **Sat Sep 25, 2010 11:10 pm**

Mesalina wrote:Secret Alliance
•Deregulater
•Anthony12

The accused are suspected of:
Secret Alliance

Game number(s):
Game 7695022

Comments: I didnt understood the strategy of Degulater but most of all of Anthony12 who had played on Degulator´s favor. When green Anthony12 started the game tried to get ausy instead SA but however he took the option and thats it.
Red had the opportunity to hit ( twice ) green- break his bonus and take a wipe on him out but he didn’t also. Useless hits on each other.
They have been in alliance, but have not stated it in game chat.
Thank you in advance for all the good things you guys are teaching me.

Hi Mesalina...it's me again (you were not annoying, by the way). If you get a chance, do a couple more things:

1) There where you list the player's names...highlight each player's name (and only the name) and then click on that button at the top of the edit-box that says "Player". This will make a direct link to that player's personal profile. This will help the multi-hunters look at your complaint.

2) There where you list the game number, highlight the number (only the number) and then click on that button at the top of the edit-box that says "Game". This will make a direct link to that specific game. This will help the multi-hunters look at your complaint, as well (this is much more important than #1, actually...because they can easily do #1 if you do #2).

Posted: **Sat Sep 25, 2010 11:40 pm**

Glad to see you got my post

I fixed the links for you:

Mesalina wrote:Secret Alliance

Deregulater
Anthony12

The accused are suspected of:
Secret Alliance

Game number(s):

Game 7695022

Comments: I didnt understood the strategy of Degulater but most of all of Anthony12 who had played on Degulator´s favor. When green Anthony12 started the game tried to get ausy instead SA but however he took the option and thats it.
Red had the opportunity to hit ( twice ) green- break his bonus and take a wipe on him out but he didn’t also. Useless hits on each other.
They have been in alliance, but have not stated it in game chat.
Thank you in advance for all the good things you guys are teaching me.

-Sully

Posted: **Sat Sep 25, 2010 11:46 pm**

Wait, isn't this: http://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=239&t=127577 the same thing?

Posted: **Sat Sep 25, 2010 11:57 pm**

Victor Sullivan wrote:Wait, isn't this: http://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=239&t=127577 the same thing?

Yes. Evil_Semp wanted Mesalina to just start over, so he closed that thread to have this one opened. The worst part was that it took my joke out of view...how awful!

(I know...I agree with you...I'm just reporting.)

Posted: **Sun Sep 26, 2010 12:45 am**

Woodruff wrote:(I know...I agree with you...I'm just reporting.)

Posted: **Sun Sep 26, 2010 12:49 am**

Victor Sullivan wrote:
Woodruff wrote:(I know...I agree with you...I'm just reporting.)

I presumed by your "isn't this the same thing" that you're also thinking (like me) "it seems pretty silly when the initial post of the other thread had already been corrected and Semp could've just looked at that by itself rather than opening up an entirely new thread that Woodruff's just going to add stuff to that he's going to have to wade through anyway".

Posted: **Sun Sep 26, 2010 12:54 am**

Woodruff wrote:
Victor Sullivan wrote:
Woodruff wrote:(I know...I agree with you...I'm just reporting.)

I presumed by your "isn't this the same thing" that you're also thinking (like me) "it seems pretty silly when the initial post of the other thread had already been corrected and Semp could've just looked at that by itself rather than opening up an entirely new thread that Woodruff's just going to add stuff to that he's going to have to wade through anyway".

Ah, yes. You would be correct. Hey, if you post enough, he'll have to swim thru 'em :lol:

Posted: **Sun Sep 26, 2010 7:39 am**

It seems that i am not the only one ..
Just for curiosity if you took a look on the other post you also had seen the last Evil´s words and that he closed it. Why the purposse to posted it here ?
(I commit an stupid thing but thanks to god today i feel more human)

Posted: **Sun Sep 26, 2010 9:59 am**

I would like to focous just only on it game, thank you

Posted: **Sun Sep 26, 2010 12:05 pm**

I don't see the secret diplomacy here. As has been said many times before just because someone doesn't make the moves that you think they should does not make it secret diplomacy. At one point it looks like you were the strongest so it only makes sense that they other two would work to weaken you. Many times it is obvious what should be done. anthony12 and Deregulater are CLEARED of secret diplomacy.

Now to address the reason I said to start another thread. The original thread was a copy and paste from another complaint. I understand the reason why it was done but it put doubts in my mind about weather or not these complaints were made by a multi. By starting a new thread I could see when the report was changed so it saved me a little effort. When I saw the new thread I knew it had been corrected. I hope that explains it.

Posted: **Sun Sep 26, 2010 1:17 pm**

Any sniveling by Mesalina should be discounted my and others experience with this player is irrational play and if you eliminate her your foed accusations of secret diplomacy abound you all are wasting your time responding to these complaints its just a case of poor loss attitude by a poor loser

Posted: **Sun Sep 26, 2010 1:38 pm**

Barney Rubble wrote:Any sniveling by Mesalina should be discounted my and others experience with this player is irrational play and if you eliminate her your foed accusations of secret diplomacy abound you all are wasting your time responding to these complaints its just a case of poor loss attitude by a poor loser

Well, I can certainly see that you've earned your 4.5 rating.

Posted: **Sun Sep 26, 2010 1:47 pm**

Then when two people work toghether in silent to reduce you it is not a secret alliance .
Thank you

Posted: **Sun Sep 26, 2010 2:25 pm**

Mesalina wrote:Then when two people work toghether in silent to reduce you it is not a secret alliance .
Thank you

With this definition all games would have secret diplomacy. Unless you can come up with some proof that they had arranged moves between each other I can't do anything. The moves in the game did not look like secret diplomacy to me. What it looks like is someone did not make an attack or attacks that you thought they should that would be to your advantage. It doesn't take communication to see when the strongest player of three needs to be brought down a notch or two.

Posted: **Sun Sep 26, 2010 2:28 pm**

Conquer Club

Secret Alliance[cleared]es

Secret Alliance[cleared]es

Re: Secret Alliance

Re: Secret Alliance

Re: Secret Alliance

Re: Secret Alliance

Re: Secret Alliance

Re: Secret Alliance

Re: Secret Alliance

Re: Secret Alliance

Re: Secret Alliance

Re: Secret Alliance

Re: Secret Alliance[cleared]es

Re: Secret Alliance[cleared]es

Re: Secret Alliance[cleared]es

Re: Secret Alliance[cleared]es

Re: Secret Alliance[cleared]es