Conquer Club

Loses a game, leaves 1* ratings and mis-leading tags.

http://www.conquerclub.com/player.php?m ... me=peetman

Accused:

peetman

The accused are suspected of:

Other: Leaving exaggeratedly poor star ratings and mis-leading tags. Only leaving poor feedback.



Game number(s):

Game 7120148 vs Miltiades127 4.7

Accused of secret diplomacy, and rudeness, nothing in the chat, no evidence posted of the accused cheating.

Game 7120148 Same game, different player, peetman loses, gives very poor ratings. for julianp
Game 7033931 again very poor ratings against the other players marrek and dinner
Note the winner of the game, didn't even get a rating for fairplay or attitude.


Game 6973439 Accuses Griegor of suiciding, clueless might be a better tag, but doesn't bother to rate the other 2 players in the game..

and finally, in the interest of full disclosure.

Game 6692914 It was a hive game, long game, and a 4 way even split that came down to 3 players, grey peetman didn't really have a chance. I got 1*'s across the board, ok fine, but no ratings for any of the other SEVENplayers in the game, all of which should have got 3 stars minimum.

I'll post more if needed, or contact some of the others with the same problem to post support if required.







Comments:

Well other than a couple misplaced tags this can hardly be considered severe ratings abuse. The 1st 3 ratings he left were all 5 star and 2 of em tagged deadbeat and the other poor strategy.

WHAT NEEDS LOOKED AT IS HIS WALL. Attempted Secret diplomacy by another player. No response on erseln wall from peetman. Nothing in game chat.

hey peetman, would you mind to have a peace agreement between nigeria and benin in game 7114993? greets
by erseln_is_good
on Fri Jun 18, 2010 4:21 am

erseln won it too.

Ohh. peetman recently rated a ? who appears to be a multi.

I think it depends on the way you look at it.

Does he deserve a warning. - Yes.

Does he deserve never to be able to play again no.

On the secret alliance, yes I agree it needs more looking at on both players.

Game 7120148 was my first game on conquer club.
Despite his unsubstantiated accusation against me for cheating and his comments trying to get me to attack opponents to benefit him, I still rated him fairly even giving 4* for gameplay.......I thought that was the idea regarding ratings.
To rate me 2* having won the game and done nothing to warrant below average ratings smells of sour grapes and I believe isn't in the spirit of the game......looking at many of his ratings left it seems to be a passion of his particularly if he loses

as jefjef said besides the first 3 tags which he labeled wrong their is nothing to support severe ratings abuse.

He has rated according to what he has observed, whether or not that is an accurate assessment of the person he has rated is null and void. Its a personal assessment of the raters. That's it.

In every rating he has left their was game chat or moves in the game that was made that could support him feeling the way he did. He felt that there was a SD between julianp and another player in a game and he rated them accordingly. You 2 got in a confrontation in chat where he didn't like the moves you made especially the one that ended the game, so he rated you as he saw fit. Besides the misuse of those few tags his ratings left atm are not in violation of the rules.

peetman Cleared of Ratings Abuse.
julianp Cleared of multi.
erseln_is_good Warned for Secret Diplomacy.
All game related chat SHALL be posted in the game chat area in a language all users can understand. This is game related chat in the wall of peetman that wasn't in the game chat area of the game.
Did peetman go along, no. The proposed truce was peetman would not attack Nigeria from Benin. Which he conquered Nigeria from erselen an hour and a half after that wall post.
peetman Cleared of SD.

KS