Page 1 of 2

Blitzaholic [cleared]lv

PostPosted: Thu Jun 03, 2010 12:48 am
by wizworm
Accused:

Blitzaholic
Jobiwan
manic_prophet
american_ninja



The accused are suspected of:

Being Multis

Other:



Game number(s):

Game 6994908


Comments:

Quads game, manual troops, all 4 team members deployed all troops to the 1 player who happens to be ranked general.
on their turn the multi accounts deploy all of their units to the general and never attack. Even if the're human players this is at best unsportsmanlike conduct

Re: Blitzaholic

PostPosted: Thu Jun 03, 2010 1:07 am
by jefjef
:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: =D> =D> =D> =D>

It's the STRATEGY for manual deploy.

Good luck in the game. :roll:

Re: Blitzaholic

PostPosted: Thu Jun 03, 2010 1:09 am
by 4 U 2 NV
each player in question is well known by others on the site. it's a strategy that is commonly used on this map. unless they have been playing all of the CC community all these years, they will be cleared. it'll be suggested to you to foe them and move on.

manual troop deployments allow for this strategy to occur. if you're not a fan of it, keep away.

Re: Blitzaholic

PostPosted: Thu Jun 03, 2010 1:16 am
by Woodruff
wizworm wrote:Quads game, manual troops, all 4 team members deployed all troops to the 1 player who happens to be ranked general.
on their turn the multi accounts deploy all of their units to the general and never attack. Even if the're human players this is at best unsportsmanlike conduct


Almost certainly not multis.

Illegal? No. Pathetic? Yes.

Re: Blitzaholic

PostPosted: Thu Jun 03, 2010 1:19 am
by TheForgivenOne
Do you seriously think that this is a bad strategy?

Me and my quads team do it all the time. It's a smart strategy to use.

Don't like it? don't play manual

Re: Blitzaholic

PostPosted: Thu Jun 03, 2010 1:22 am
by lord voldemort
nice stripes to lower his rank lol

Re: Blitzaholic

PostPosted: Thu Jun 03, 2010 2:14 am
by grifftron
3 letters... L O L

-griff

Re: Blitzaholic

PostPosted: Thu Jun 03, 2010 2:20 am
by alster
wizworm wrote:Accused:

Blitzaholic
Jobiwan
manic_prophet
american_ninja



The accused are suspected of:

Being Multis

Other:



Game number(s):

Game 6994908


Comments:

Quads game, manual troops, all 4 team members deployed all troops to the 1 player who happens to be ranked general.
on their turn the multi accounts deploy all of their units to the general and never attack. Even if the're human players this is at best unsportsmanlike conduct


Haha! You just made my day mate! :D

Re: Blitzaholic

PostPosted: Thu Jun 03, 2010 3:01 am
by Army of GOD
TheForgivenOne wrote:Do you seriously think that this is a bad strategy?

Me and my quads team do it all the time. It's a smart strategy to use.

Don't like it? don't play manual


I don't think it's a bad strategy, but I do find it pathetic that he's playing with low rankings AGAINST low rankings.

Re: Blitzaholic

PostPosted: Thu Jun 03, 2010 4:09 am
by john9blue
Welcome to the types of strategies that get you to the top of the scoreboard.

Re: Blitzaholic

PostPosted: Thu Jun 03, 2010 10:29 am
by Natascha
:lol:

definitely no multi's.
It is the strategy on this map with manual deployment.

cheers,
Tascha

Re: Blitzaholic

PostPosted: Thu Jun 03, 2010 10:50 am
by clapper011
AOG, he is in team one, the lower ranks joined as team 2, so they joined "against" him and the others.

Re: Blitzaholic

PostPosted: Thu Jun 03, 2010 10:55 am
by gcwca_4_life
Army of GOD wrote:
TheForgivenOne wrote:Do you seriously think that this is a bad strategy?

Me and my quads team do it all the time. It's a smart strategy to use.

Don't like it? don't play manual


I don't think it's a bad strategy, but I do find it pathetic that he's playing with low rankings AGAINST low rankings.

Hey. You can decide who is on your team, most of the time. But you can rarely ever decide who your playing against in public games. Anyone could join. ;)




This thread is a joke, and a waste of time. If you don't like the way manual deployment is played, then stay away from it! It's what I do. ;)

Re: Blitzaholic

PostPosted: Thu Jun 03, 2010 11:04 am
by jefjef
Army of GOD wrote:
TheForgivenOne wrote:Do you seriously think that this is a bad strategy?

Me and my quads team do it all the time. It's a smart strategy to use.

Don't like it? don't play manual


I don't think it's a bad strategy, but I do find it pathetic that he's playing with low rankings AGAINST low rankings.


Whats with the crap attitude? Rank envy?

There is not a single thing wrong with that game EXCEPT for a couple MULTI's on team 2.

Re: Blitzaholic

PostPosted: Thu Jun 03, 2010 11:58 am
by Bones2484
clapper011 wrote:AOG, he is in team one, the lower ranks joined as team 2, so they joined "against" him and the others.


Did you read his post? I think you missed a key part of it that explains exactly how Blitz gains tons of points from this when he shouldnt. Let me bold it for you.

AoG wrote:I don't think it's a bad strategy, but I do find it pathetic that he's playing with low rankings AGAINST low rankings.


Very pathetic indeed. Hopefully if he makes conq again he'll at least give himself one of those fancy "farming" tags in the thread he upkeeps.

Re: Blitzaholic

PostPosted: Thu Jun 03, 2010 12:13 pm
by jefjef
Bones2484 wrote:
clapper011 wrote:AOG, he is in team one, the lower ranks joined as team 2, so they joined "against" him and the others.


Did you read his post? I think you missed a key part of it that explains exactly how Blitz gains tons of points from this when he shouldnt. Let me bold it for you.

AoG wrote:I don't think it's a bad strategy, but I do find it pathetic that he's playing with low rankings AGAINST low rankings.


Very pathetic indeed. Hopefully if he makes conq again he'll at least give himself one of those fancy "farming" tags in the thread he upkeeps.


So because of his rank you condemn him for playing games with strippers. That entire line of thought is pathetic. If you look AoG capitalized AGAINST.

Rank envy much? So so SAD.

EDIT: Hey blitz I'll join ya in a few dubs against some of these whiners and farm their points with ya. (except for bones. He's never coming off foe.)

Re: Blitzaholic

PostPosted: Thu Jun 03, 2010 12:22 pm
by jbrettlip
This should be up for thread of the year. I always knew Blitz was doing something pathetic and illegal when we played team games....now my eyes have been opened. HHAHAHHA

Does OP know there is team chat, to help coordinate moves?

Re: Blitzaholic

PostPosted: Thu Jun 03, 2010 1:01 pm
by clapper011
jefjef wrote:
Bones2484 wrote:
clapper011 wrote:AOG, he is in team one, the lower ranks joined as team 2, so they joined "against" him and the others.


Did you read his post? I think you missed a key part of it that explains exactly how Blitz gains tons of points from this when he shouldnt. Let me bold it for you.

AoG wrote:I don't think it's a bad strategy, but I do find it pathetic that he's playing with low rankings AGAINST low rankings.


Very pathetic indeed. Hopefully if he makes conq again he'll at least give himself one of those fancy "farming" tags in the thread he upkeeps.


So because of his rank you condemn him for playing games with strippers. That entire line of thought is pathetic. If you look AoG capitalized AGAINST.

Rank envy much? So so SAD.

EDIT: Hey blitz I'll join ya in a few dubs against some of these whiners and farm their points with ya. (except for bones. He's never coming off foe.)

well the one thing about this is that he is one of the few of the higher ranks (there is a few out there that will) play with the lower ranks. Thus including myself (note the lower rank i have? ;))

Re: Blitzaholic

PostPosted: Thu Jun 03, 2010 1:10 pm
by stahrgazer
It's a team game with no spoils. Deploying on one guy to do the kills makes sense...regardless of the map... as long as the other members of the team aren't in danger of being taken out.

Re: Blitzaholic

PostPosted: Thu Jun 03, 2010 1:10 pm
by eddie2
clapper011 wrote:
jefjef wrote:
Bones2484 wrote:
clapper011 wrote:AOG, he is in team one, the lower ranks joined as team 2, so they joined "against" him and the others.


Did you read his post? I think you missed a key part of it that explains exactly how Blitz gains tons of points from this when he shouldnt. Let me bold it for you.

AoG wrote:I don't think it's a bad strategy, but I do find it pathetic that he's playing with low rankings AGAINST low rankings.


Very pathetic indeed. Hopefully if he makes conq again he'll at least give himself one of those fancy "farming" tags in the thread he upkeeps.


So because of his rank you condemn him for playing games with strippers. That entire line of thought is pathetic. If you look AoG capitalized AGAINST.

Rank envy much? So so SAD.

EDIT: Hey blitz I'll join ya in a few dubs against some of these whiners and farm their points with ya. (except for bones. He's never coming off foe.)

well the one thing about this is that he is one of the few of the higher ranks (there is a few out there that will) play with the lower ranks. Thus including myself (note the lower rank i have? ;))

Re: Blitzaholic

PostPosted: Thu Jun 03, 2010 1:13 pm
by clapper011
eddie2 wrote:
clapper011 wrote:
jefjef wrote:
Bones2484 wrote:
clapper011 wrote:AOG, he is in team one, the lower ranks joined as team 2, so they joined "against" him and the others.


Did you read his post? I think you missed a key part of it that explains exactly how Blitz gains tons of points from this when he shouldnt. Let me bold it for you.

AoG wrote:I don't think it's a bad strategy, but I do find it pathetic that he's playing with low rankings AGAINST low rankings.


Very pathetic indeed. Hopefully if he makes conq again he'll at least give himself one of those fancy "farming" tags in the thread he upkeeps.


So because of his rank you condemn him for playing games with strippers. That entire line of thought is pathetic. If you look AoG capitalized AGAINST.

Rank envy much? So so SAD.

EDIT: Hey blitz I'll join ya in a few dubs against some of these whiners and farm their points with ya. (except for bones. He's never coming off foe.)

well the one thing about this is that he is one of the few of the higher ranks (there is a few out there that will) play with the lower ranks. Thus including myself (note the lower rank i have? ;))

is that an invite to team up with me then eddie?...

Re: Blitzaholic

PostPosted: Thu Jun 03, 2010 1:13 pm
by Army of GOD
jefjef wrote:
Bones2484 wrote:
clapper011 wrote:AOG, he is in team one, the lower ranks joined as team 2, so they joined "against" him and the others.


Did you read his post? I think you missed a key part of it that explains exactly how Blitz gains tons of points from this when he shouldnt. Let me bold it for you.

AoG wrote:I don't think it's a bad strategy, but I do find it pathetic that he's playing with low rankings AGAINST low rankings.


Very pathetic indeed. Hopefully if he makes conq again he'll at least give himself one of those fancy "farming" tags in the thread he upkeeps.


So because of his rank you condemn him for playing games with strippers. That entire line of thought is pathetic. If you look AoG capitalized AGAINST.

Rank envy much? So so SAD.

EDIT: Hey blitz I'll join ya in a few dubs against some of these whiners and farm their points with ya. (except for bones. He's never coming off foe.)


I only capitalized AGAINST to put an extra emphasis on the fact that he's the only player above Sargent in the game.

And, yea, he can't choose who joins his games but sometimes he KNOWS who's going to join. Like when someone makes 40 1v1 games on Feudal and 37 fill up with New Recruits.

Re: Blitzaholic

PostPosted: Thu Jun 03, 2010 2:35 pm
by Natascha
I am wondering why people think this strategy is pathetic.

This is a game site, and we all play games to try to WIN. When the best strategy is: deploy on 1 person & he does the main work, then I would say this is good teamwork.

Why should people drop/attack on other places if that makes your team loose the game????


Besides, Blitz & team created those games, no one knows which people or what ranks will join other team!

cheers,
tascha

Re: Blitzaholic

PostPosted: Thu Jun 03, 2010 2:43 pm
by jefjef
Army of GOD wrote:
jefjef wrote:
Bones2484 wrote:
clapper011 wrote:AOG, he is in team one, the lower ranks joined as team 2, so they joined "against" him and the others.


Did you read his post? I think you missed a key part of it that explains exactly how Blitz gains tons of points from this when he shouldnt. Let me bold it for you.

AoG wrote:I don't think it's a bad strategy, but I do find it pathetic that he's playing with low rankings AGAINST low rankings.


Very pathetic indeed. Hopefully if he makes conq again he'll at least give himself one of those fancy "farming" tags in the thread he upkeeps.


So because of his rank you condemn him for playing games with strippers. That entire line of thought is pathetic. If you look AoG capitalized AGAINST.

Rank envy much? So so SAD.

EDIT: Hey blitz I'll join ya in a few dubs against some of these whiners and farm their points with ya. (except for bones. He's never coming off foe.)


I only capitalized AGAINST to put an extra emphasis on the fact that he's the only player above Sargent in the game.

And, yea, he can't choose who joins his games but sometimes he KNOWS who's going to join. Like when someone makes 40 1v1 games on Feudal and 37 fill up with New Recruits.


Well this isn't one of those cases is it?

Re: Blitzaholic

PostPosted: Thu Jun 03, 2010 5:00 pm
by L M S
Perhaps you should sit there and take notes, or at least try and look pretty.