Conquer Club

Accused:

HRM
Shakman
stormtrooper55



The accused are suspected of:

Being Multis and/or Conducting Secret Diplomacy




Game number(s):

6956363




Comments: Have not attacked one another to disrupt territory bonuses the entire game. Often leaving only 1 person on boundaries (but still unbothered/unattacked). Has been this way since very beginning of game. Game is still in progress. Please review current board and future moves.

Thank you.

emmons1204 wrote:Accused:
HRM
Shakman
stormtrooper55



The accused are suspected of:

Being Multis and/or Conducting Secret Diplomacy




Game number(s):

Game 6956363



Comments: Have not attacked one another to disrupt territory bonuses the entire game. Often leaving only 1 person on boundaries (but still unbothered/unattacked). Has been this way since very beginning of game. Game is still in progress. Please review current board and future moves.

Thank you.

fixed the links

thanks Masli..

these guys are all Cleared from Multis and SD.

1st this is the only game they have played i, 2nd they talked about aligning in chat, 3rd those that didn't talk about aligning in chat would look at the situation in the game perceive it that you were running away with it and not attack each other even to break bonuses in hopes that they can bring you down in size and have a chance at the game.

Its common sense.

Your ahead on troops, have almost 20 more territories then the next highest player in the game and your receiving 40 troops a turn, while that next highest guy is getting 24 if you didn't break his bonuses in Africa that are guarded with a 6 army.

They are Cleared. Closed.

KS

At that time, it made sense for everyone to attack me, I agree. But how about the beginning stages of the game? How about right now?

It's clear to me that this site isn't very good at keeping gameplay balanced and/or fair.

i 100% agree with sam.
it makes sense to be attacking you being the strongest player.
now that teal has caught up to you in the last round you should see it balance out some more.

Having said that....bad strategy does not equal secret diplomacy

emmons1204 wrote:At that time, it made sense for everyone to attack me, I agree. But how about the beginning stages of the game? How about right now?

It's clear to me that this site isn't very good at keeping gameplay balanced and/or fair.

it was never a secret... it was offered in open chat

2010-05-17 08:32:05 - jrosen466: Green - how about a truce over Greenland/Iceland border?
2010-05-17 11:42:43 - Shakman: Yellow.... truce will be good for now, we're gathering a lot of armies in that area i think its enough
2010-05-17 12:51:19 - emmons1204: I'll truce with you blue, as that seems to be the popular way to do things =P
2010-05-17 13:00:47 - n00b1nside: lol
2010-05-18 03:38:03 - n00b1nside: yellow...pink is the one i won't attack

They made truces and you and Blue aligned. Blue being boob1nside and pink being you.
Everyone saw that and aligned themselves. Just cause the game isnt going your way doesnt mean they are cheating.

And..

2010-05-18 10:25:02 - emmons1204: Still trying to figure out all of the secret diplomacies...

people dont like to be called cheaters, maybe another reason why the heat is on you.

Plus as of just now

p:emmons

• 105 troops
• 44 regions
• last bonus 46
• due 27 troops this next round

c:stormtrooper55

• 107 troops
• 36 regions
• last bonus 15
• due 27 troops this next round

seriously ??

case has been ruled on, there is no violations from any of the other players in this game, if you want to win this game then you have to do it on your own, your not going to get help from us by saying it was cheating.

KS