Page 1 of 1

theherkman - implied racism [cleared] lv

PostPosted: Sun May 16, 2010 4:14 pm
by CamelToe
Accused:
theherkman

The accused are suspected of:
Other: racism

Game number(s):
Game 6991027

Comments:
2010-05-16 16:53:25 - theherkman: go red! kick blues white trash ass!
2010-05-16 16:55:53 - CamelToe: im black
2010-05-16 17:01:05 - House Ankm: are you really black camel?
2010-05-16 17:02:07 - CamelToe: mixed...but i look black
2010-05-16 17:03:16 - theherkman: figures
2010-05-16 17:04:14 - CamelToe: figures im black?
2010-05-16 17:04:24 - CamelToe: u got something to say then say it
2010-05-16 17:08:03 - theherkman: Not on cc where its against the rules... :)
2010-05-16 17:10:35 - theherkman: But if you can read... Then do so between the lines...

Re: theherkman - implied racism

PostPosted: Sun May 16, 2010 4:24 pm
by eddie2
this looks on the border will be interesting to see what way it goes

Re: theherkman - implied racism

PostPosted: Sun May 16, 2010 4:30 pm
by Serbia
What do you want, a warning for subliminal messages? Thought control? Mind police? Please, lame attempt at getting attention. Foe and move on.

Re: theherkman - implied racism

PostPosted: Sun May 16, 2010 4:30 pm
by theherkman
I wasn't going to be racist as that is not allowed here. I decided to follow the rules instead and refrain.

Re: theherkman - implied racism

PostPosted: Sun May 16, 2010 6:17 pm
by edwinissweet
I thought it was against the rules to be openly annoying though. If not racism, it could be considered baiting.

Re: theherkman - implied racism

PostPosted: Sun May 16, 2010 8:18 pm
by Serbia
edwinissweet wrote:I thought it was against the rules to be openly annoying though. If not racism, it could be considered baiting.


Right. In that case, I feel that you're responding directly to ME, since I posted a dissenting opinion FIRST, so I feel you are baiting me, which I find annoying. You deserve no less than a 72 hour ban for your transgression.

Please people, think before you write. There is no way those few simple lines, with a complete lack of history, could possibly be considered baiting or racism, since no racism was actually written.

Re: theherkman - implied racism

PostPosted: Sun May 16, 2010 8:54 pm
by jrh_cardinal
Serbia wrote:
edwinissweet wrote:I thought it was against the rules to be openly annoying though. If not racism, it could be considered baiting.


Right. In that case, I feel that you're responding directly to ME, since I posted a dissenting opinion FIRST, so I feel you are baiting me, which I find annoying. You deserve no less than a 72 hour ban for your transgression.

Please people, think before you write. There is no way those few simple lines, with a complete lack of history, could possibly be considered baiting or racism, since no racism was actually written.

Serbia's got it right here. Holy shit, if the multihunters tried to moderate every time something this minor is said, holy shit, they'd never keep up

FAMO!

Re: theherkman - implied racism

PostPosted: Sun May 16, 2010 8:58 pm
by jefjef
edwinissweet wrote:I thought it was against the rules to be openly annoying though. If not racism, it could be considered baiting.


If your going to practice moderating then try to learn the rules.

As much as I would like to see CamelToe AND herkman banned this is GAME CHAT. No rules broken. Not even annoying.

FOE is the way to roll.

Re: theherkman - implied racism

PostPosted: Sun May 16, 2010 9:10 pm
by lord voldemort
indeed...i do not want to begin a witch hunt even a tiny bit...Until someone actually comes out and says "enter bigotry here" then we will usually stay out of it.

If you dont enjoy the comments someone makes in game chat...ignore them...im kind of getting sick of moderators repeating themselves on this matter.

cleared

Re: theherkman - implied racism [cleared] lv

PostPosted: Sun May 16, 2010 10:26 pm
by king sam
edwinissweet is one of the many Volunteers here that is just trying to help get things resolved.

while this may not be the direction we go with this it doesnt hurt to hear his opinion, he wasnt giving the ruling, just an opinion on the matter.

but to make it clear the annoying and gamesmanship rules are both violations that have a lot, and i mean a lot of data to support behind it.

Im not going to drag this players name through the mud anymore, and hope all who know who Im talking about dont either but if you dig (and not very hard) you can find an example or two of the kind of lewd behavior that gets punished for those things.

Thanks edwinissweet for the help.

KS