Conquer Club

Accused:
Juan_Bottom



The accused are suspected of:

Using Severe Derogatory Language


Comments:
viewtopic.php?f=8&t=115552&start=15#p2562601

im confused...I dont see anything wrong with the post

lord voldemort wrote:im confused...I dont see anything wrong with the post

i think he is on about comments like this

we only got this far into Iraq by our Military's policy (UK too)of specifically targeting Iraqi children for genocide. I've been over this.
Sure we got ride of Saddam, but we didn't do it out of the kindness of our hearts or any power he held over us. We did it all for the nookie.but i dont know what it is

God Emperor Q wrote:Accused:
Juan_Bottom

The accused are suspected of:

Using Severe Derogatory Language

Comments:
viewtopic.php?f=8&t=115552&start=15#p2562601

Huh? Juan and I don't exactly get along well, but I'm really not seeing anything there that seems worthy of an "abuse" posting.

Even as a farmed-out satellite military of the American armed forces, the DDR must have been a bunch of faggots.

New research has begun to show that, much like race, homosexuality is quite biological and not in the control of the person(s) that show homosexuality. One such case study is shown here:

http://serendip.brynmawr.edu/exchange/node/33

Studies on the neuroendocrine function in homosexuality has shown that while levels of testosterone and estrogen do not typically vary along the lines of homo and heterosexuality, it is one's response mechanisms to these hormones that can play a role in sexual orientation.

Furthermore,

http://www.theatlantic.com/past/issues/97jun/burr2.htm

In 1982 the cell biologist Christine de Lacoste-Utamsine and the physical anthropologist Ralph Holloway published in Science an examination of a structure in the human brain called the corpus callosum.

...

Swaab announced an even more remarkable discovery five years later, in 1990. He had found, he wrote in an article in the journal Brain Research, that a cluster of cells in the human brain called the suprachiasmatic nucleus was dimorphic -- but dimorphic according to sexual orientation rather than sex.

If true, this was something wholly new: an anatomical difference between homosexuals and heterosexuals.

With homosexuality being biological, not pathological, one can than draw the following conclusion:

To use discriminating language against homosexuality is not only bigotry, but should also be punished under the same circumstances as racism.

Is this just a "is homosexuality wrong?" thread?

lol,

God Emperor Q wrote:New research has begun to show that, much like race, homosexuality is quite biological and not in the control of the person(s) that show homosexuality. One such case study is shown here:

As a forum regular, you should know that I have argued exactly this before. The term "Faggots" is used here in the "South Park Sense," Not in an attack on homosexuals. It makes no sense to say "that army is made up of a bunch of gay people" especially in a mocking response so you should be able to see that without me telling you. So you get a gold star for being politically correct. And another one for showing off your knowledge of the gay people. But boo for attacking the wrong guy so obviously.

Unfortunately for me right now, I have 10 million posts on CC, and do not feel like going through them all. So here is just one snippet:

viewtopic.php?f=6&t=96884&start=75

Firstly, second what RT said. In fact just last weekend I was at my cousin's wedding. She got married to a girl... & damn her wife is hot.
Secondly I removed the word "probably" from the quote. They actually found the [gay] gene.
Thirdly, yeah, WTF? I had a "coming out" of my own once. Not the same thing, but I have a religious family myself, and had to confront them with my being an atheist. Wasn't easy, but I wasn't asking forgiveness or anything. Next time try explaining it to people with a baseball bat in your hand. Made it a lot easier for me.... just yell a lot and shake the bat a bit. I had my bat engraved with the name "The Persuader."
Lastly the only thing that is gonna hurt your chances for prez is that you are running against Snorri. A recent Rasmussen put his support at 83%
Oh, and assuming that you also received a warning or temp ban(I'm back from a 72 hour one myself), that can only help. TheForgivenOne you're a damned Maverick, you are.

However, since this time it has come to my attention that the scientific community does not support the finding of "the gay gene." So let me throw that disclaimer there.

Edit: second thread
viewtopic.php?f=8&t=98810&p=2251242&hilit

God Emperor Q wrote:To use discriminating language against homosexuality is not only bigotry, but should also be punished under the same circumstances as racism.

Owen just came back from a banning for wasting moderators time you know?

Woodruff wrote:Huh? Juan and I don't exactly get along well, but I'm really not seeing anything there that seems worthy of an "abuse" posting.

hehehe seconded. I'm not 12 after all.

firth4eva wrote:Is this just a "is homosexuality wrong?" thread?

Link it in OT and we will see.

God Emperor Q wrote:

Even as a farmed-out satellite military of the American armed forces, the DDR must have been a bunch of faggots.

New research has begun to show that, much like race, homosexuality is quite biological and not in the control of the person(s) that show homosexuality. One such case study is shown here:

http://serendip.brynmawr.edu/exchange/node/33

Studies on the neuroendocrine function in homosexuality has shown that while levels of testosterone and estrogen do not typically vary along the lines of homo and heterosexuality, it is one's response mechanisms to these hormones that can play a role in sexual orientation.

Furthermore,

http://www.theatlantic.com/past/issues/97jun/burr2.htm

In 1982 the cell biologist Christine de Lacoste-Utamsine and the physical anthropologist Ralph Holloway published in Science an examination of a structure in the human brain called the corpus callosum.

...

Swaab announced an even more remarkable discovery five years later, in 1990. He had found, he wrote in an article in the journal Brain Research, that a cluster of cells in the human brain called the suprachiasmatic nucleus was dimorphic -- but dimorphic according to sexual orientation rather than sex.

If true, this was something wholly new: an anatomical difference between homosexuals and heterosexuals.

With homosexuality being biological, not pathological, one can than draw the following conclusion:

To use discriminating language against homosexuality is not only bigotry, but should also be punished under the same circumstances as racism.

now i agree with you lv i always thought faggots were meatballs made by mr brains

Gee, the only abusive language I saw in that post was "Juan_Bottom."

ZOMG

Uh oh, Juan, you really did it now!

Woodruff wrote:

God Emperor Q wrote:Accused:
Juan_Bottom

The accused are suspected of:

Using Severe Derogatory Language

Comments:
viewtopic.php?f=8&t=115552&start=15#p2562601

Huh? Juan and I don't exactly get along well, but I'm really not seeing anything there that seems worthy of an "abuse" posting.

Well I must agree with the herbaceous perennial plants opinion. He is actually correct.

Spurious complaint.

God Emperor Q wrote:

Even as a farmed-out satellite military of the American armed forces, the DDR must have been a bunch of faggots.

New research has begun to show that, much like race, homosexuality is quite biological and not in the control of the person(s) that show homosexuality. One such case study is shown here:

http://serendip.brynmawr.edu/exchange/node/33

Studies on the neuroendocrine function in homosexuality has shown that while levels of testosterone and estrogen do not typically vary along the lines of homo and heterosexuality, it is one's response mechanisms to these hormones that can play a role in sexual orientation.

Furthermore,

http://www.theatlantic.com/past/issues/97jun/burr2.htm

In 1982 the cell biologist Christine de Lacoste-Utamsine and the physical anthropologist Ralph Holloway published in Science an examination of a structure in the human brain called the corpus callosum.

...

Swaab announced an even more remarkable discovery five years later, in 1990. He had found, he wrote in an article in the journal Brain Research, that a cluster of cells in the human brain called the suprachiasmatic nucleus was dimorphic -- but dimorphic according to sexual orientation rather than sex.

If true, this was something wholly new: an anatomical difference between homosexuals and heterosexuals.

With homosexuality being biological, not pathological, one can than draw the following conclusion:

To use discriminating language against homosexuality is not only bigotry, but should also be punished under the same circumstances as racism.

so we should be sueing whoever wrote the bible then?

There is nothing in this report ref. Juan Bottom to suggest Using Severe Derogatory Language he/she is only stating his oppion and nothing more. Do to some of the words that are used I can see where it might be construded as more but its not. Therefore I feel this will only be noted and closed.

Eye84free