Page 1 of 1

Arches, continues being offensive [closed] lv

PostPosted: Tue Mar 30, 2010 1:14 am
by Tezu
Accused:

Arches




The accused are suspected of:


Severe Chat Abuse




Game number(s):

Game 6354238

Comments:

After my first complaint about this guy posting something offensive on my wall, i foed him, but he still posted really offensive comments on the game chat!!!!

Re: Arches, continues being offensive

PostPosted: Tue Mar 30, 2010 1:26 am
by lord voldemort
didnt you foe him???? how are you reading comments in chat?

Re: Arches, continues being offensive

PostPosted: Tue Mar 30, 2010 1:33 am
by Tezu
I saw responses other players posted, got curious unfoed him temporarily and re-foed him.

Re: Arches, continues being offensive

PostPosted: Tue Mar 30, 2010 2:39 am
by eddie2
ok i just read the start of the game chat as shown below


2010-02-25 21:24:54 - Arches: blue is so dead, he got 1 troop everyone
2010-02-25 23:39:42 - Arches: everywhere*
2010-03-04 04:49:25 - Arches: tezu do what i PMed you to do :D and u will definitely win
2010-03-05 02:28:35 - firesnail: Jamboman...I'm not going to attack you...you might want to put some pressure on red...becasue eventually she's going to have enough troops to crush me, take my spoils and you'll be next..

was he looked at for secret diplomacy or is this just abuse thats getting looked at

Re: Arches, continues being offensive

PostPosted: Tue Mar 30, 2010 11:49 am
by Snowgun
Pretty tame stuff in game chat. C&A can't stop people from being assholes, just from breaking the rules.

Now that you actually have him FOED, he won't join any more of your games, can't write on your wall, PM's will go nowhere if you set that up correctly....So nothing to worry about.

If he stalks you in future games he obviously won't be playing in, then he will get spanked. Till then he is effectively neutralized.

Re: Arches, continues being offensive

PostPosted: Tue Mar 30, 2010 1:09 pm
by deathcomesrippin
PMing someone to do something in game is Secret Diplomacy, is it not?

Re: Arches, continues being offensive

PostPosted: Tue Mar 30, 2010 1:21 pm
by eddie2
deathcomesrippin wrote:PMing someone to do something in game is Secret Diplomacy, is it not?


this is what i was thinking and you dont need any proof because he admits it in chat

Re: Arches, continues being offensive

PostPosted: Tue Mar 30, 2010 2:01 pm
by army of nobunaga
glad you didnt rise to his bait. and i would unfoe him if I were you, easy points. permitir a la gente naco parecer stupido =D

Re: Arches, continues being offensive

PostPosted: Tue Mar 30, 2010 3:01 pm
by lord voldemort
eddie2 wrote:
deathcomesrippin wrote:PMing someone to do something in game is Secret Diplomacy, is it not?


this is what i was thinking and you dont need any proof because he admits it in chat


still do actually...he could always be lying...

Re: Arches, continues being offensive

PostPosted: Tue Mar 30, 2010 4:09 pm
by eddie2
lord voldemort wrote:
eddie2 wrote:
deathcomesrippin wrote:PMing someone to do something in game is Secret Diplomacy, is it not?


this is what i was thinking and you dont need any proof because he admits it in chat


still do actually...he could always be lying...


2 things there if he is lying tough shit hit him for stating it in chat as he nailed his own coffin there. you have abusive pms in one thread where he had a warning now you got him saying he sent a message of secret diplomacy just ban him from chat he sounds like a noob.

other thing is congrates on your colour change

Re: Arches, continues being offensive

PostPosted: Mon Apr 05, 2010 1:37 pm
by Empress Wu
No, it's not secret diplomacy. Arches talked about a PM to tezu one week after she had eliminated him. So that seems to be legitimate advice rather than secret diplomacy.

Re: Arches, continues being offensive

PostPosted: Thu Apr 15, 2010 5:26 am
by lord voldemort
Im going to close this....a) the report is about someone being offensive in chat and that can be solved by having them on foe. Im confused about how he got into your game if you had him on foe....but thats neither here nor there.

closed