Page 1 of 1

Natty_dreed [cleared]

PostPosted: Thu Mar 04, 2010 9:54 am
by eddie2
Accused:Natty_dreed





The accused are suspected of:
always making up peoples quotes in threads since he is a member of the news letter he should be stopped from doing this as he changes them to intice players into a flame war with him. where if people bite to this they get a ban so please stop him from doing this 1 example is in this forum viewtopic.php?f=6&t=110786. =D> please not this is a basic one some of the others are quite bad

Re: Natty_dreed

PostPosted: Thu Mar 04, 2010 10:21 am
by lord voldemort
Please show me where he changed a quote. Infact this isnt abuse at all. As I already said to you in a pm changing a quote is not against the rules. Sure if he flames or actually baits someone then yer. But he has never done so.
I pm'd you yesterday to stop with the spurious reports did you not receive it?

Re: Natty_dreed

PostPosted: Thu Mar 04, 2010 10:47 am
by eddie2
lord voldemort wrote:Please show me where he changed a quote. Infact this isnt abuse at all. As I already said to you in a pm changing a quote is not against the rules. Sure if he flames or actually baits someone then yer. But he has never done so.
I pm'd you yesterday to stop with the spurious reports did you not receive it?


lord volt you seen the thread last week involving me and him where i was baited through his forum quote changes. and your pm yesterday ok i understand they had 2 different flag but timur the lame is also suspected in a thread below this one that has started. where other players suspect he is a multi. the over one was GloverparkDude sorry but someone who can talk cc talk in 2 games and become a major within a week of playing there is somthing sus there. maybe not duality like i thought he might be but more than likely a definate multi. so sorry for reporting these thing to u will not do anymore.

ps if this is the attitued for bringing to attention possible multis then fair be it. but remember i have read that 2 players online at the same time cannot be multis so cleared. ha i can prove that false. also the game yesterday i was watching the times change every minite of log in times. so this makes it a valid suspision. so i have no problem with this but if we did not draw these things to your attention then the site would be full of multis.

ow yes and take a second look at stuwhat84 he is deffinatly a multi for GloverparkDude

Re: Natty_dreed

PostPosted: Thu Mar 04, 2010 12:03 pm
by army of nobunaga
eddie2 wrote:ow yes and take a second look at stuwhat84 he is deffinatly a multi for GloverparkDude


He is correct there. the rest made my eyes hurt and my head bleed.

Re: Natty_dreed

PostPosted: Thu Mar 04, 2010 12:52 pm
by lord voldemort
army of nobunaga wrote:
eddie2 wrote:ow yes and take a second look at stuwhat84 he is deffinatly a multi for GloverparkDude


He is correct there. the rest made my eyes hurt and my head bleed.


And what evidence do you have that supports this??

Re: Natty_dreed

PostPosted: Thu Mar 04, 2010 1:01 pm
by eddie2
lord voldemort wrote:
army of nobunaga wrote:
eddie2 wrote:ow yes and take a second look at stuwhat84 he is deffinatly a multi for GloverparkDude


He is correct there. the rest made my eyes hurt and my head bleed.


And what evidence do you have that supports this??


have a look at poss multi gloverparkdude thread have posted some game nos in that also just had another look today and he has played about another 6 games with stuwhat84 private games taking his points all the time probally to build his rank up also note major in 7 days also talking about dice runs on his 2nd game. like he knows what the die are like.

Re: Natty_dreed

PostPosted: Thu Mar 04, 2010 1:47 pm
by pimpdave
I accuse Natty_dreed of not even existing!

Re: Natty_dreed

PostPosted: Thu Mar 04, 2010 1:48 pm
by thegreekdog
:lol:

natty dreeeeeeeeed.

Re: Natty_dreed

PostPosted: Thu Mar 04, 2010 1:58 pm
by Frankly, my dear
This thread was a waste of my fucking time. Please fill out a report on the multis and create a new thread. The other shit you have brought up seems to be going to over the head of the mod which is less than wise but I really don't care what you do. Fix the multis accusation.

Re: Natty_dreed

PostPosted: Thu Mar 04, 2010 2:01 pm
by Imaweasel
Frankly, my dear .... are you a mod? Or a multi hunter? :roll: Im just wondering not to be mean or rude or anything but if you are I have some info I would like to submit to you so you can check it out.

Re: Natty_dreed

PostPosted: Thu Mar 04, 2010 2:10 pm
by lord voldemort
Imaweasel wrote:Frankly, my dear .... are you a mod? Or a multi hunter? :roll: Im just wondering not to be mean or rude or anything but if you are I have some info I would like to submit to you so you can check it out.

mods are in bold colours ;)

Re: Natty_dreed

PostPosted: Thu Mar 04, 2010 2:14 pm
by army of nobunaga
lord voldemort wrote:
army of nobunaga wrote:
eddie2 wrote:ow yes and take a second look at stuwhat84 he is deffinatly a multi for GloverparkDude


He is correct there. the rest made my eyes hurt and my head bleed.


And what evidence do you have that supports this??



I have no evidence other than that looks and smeeels like a fish. Without ip tracing's or crystal ball you can not really have proof. And even then the cheater could be using a disguise or something that would make the crystal ball = null.

Re: Natty_dreed

PostPosted: Fri Mar 05, 2010 7:48 pm
by jefjef
LV

You want more evidence vs Natty_Dread go to his posts and search key word jefjef and you will see a multitude of baits and flames.

Re: Natty_dreed

PostPosted: Sat Mar 06, 2010 3:47 am
by rutherfoo
Natty dread seems like a good guy to me.
All the posts of his that I've seen have been normal, civil posts.

Re: Natty_dreed

PostPosted: Sat Mar 06, 2010 6:03 pm
by jefjef
rutherfoo wrote:Natty dread seems like a good guy to me.
All the posts of his that I've seen have been normal, civil posts.


This is an example of his civil posting. A large % of em are like this.

natty_dread wrote:Let's toss jefjef in the toilet... and see if shit indeed does float...

Re: Natty_dreed

PostPosted: Sat Mar 06, 2010 6:06 pm
by Army of GOD
jefjef wrote:
rutherfoo wrote:Natty dread seems like a good guy to me.
All the posts of his that I've seen have been normal, civil posts.


This is an example of his civil posting. A large % of em are like this.

natty_dread wrote:Let's toss jefjef in the toilet... and see if shit indeed does float...


What else floats?

...

A duck!

Re: Natty_dreed

PostPosted: Sat Mar 06, 2010 7:00 pm
by the.killing.44
Army of GOD wrote:
jefjef wrote:
rutherfoo wrote:Natty dread seems like a good guy to me.
All the posts of his that I've seen have been normal, civil posts.


This is an example of his civil posting. A large % of em are like this.

natty_dread wrote:Let's toss jefjef in the toilet... and see if shit indeed does float...


What else floats?

...

A duck!

Very small rocks

Re: Natty_dreed

PostPosted: Sat Mar 06, 2010 7:24 pm
by AAFitz
the.killing.44 wrote:
Army of GOD wrote:
jefjef wrote:
rutherfoo wrote:Natty dread seems like a good guy to me.
All the posts of his that I've seen have been normal, civil posts.


This is an example of his civil posting. A large % of em are like this.

natty_dread wrote:Let's toss jefjef in the toilet... and see if shit indeed does float...


What else floats?

...

A duck!

Very small rocks


witches

Re: Natty_dreed

PostPosted: Sat Mar 06, 2010 10:15 pm
by Imaweasel
cheaters...?

Re: Natty_dreed

PostPosted: Thu Mar 11, 2010 1:06 pm
by natty dread
I just found this thread, and it's been making me lol... well, kinda giggle anyway.

Let's see if I got this straight... I'm accused of paraphrasing? Oh, woe is me.

Jefjef, I can only wonder. I mostly don't read your posts because the extra click is such a hassle, but in a thread concerning me where my good name is being smeared with spurious accusations, I will have to make an exception.


jefjef wrote:This is an example of his civil posting. A large % of em are like this.


1) you have totally taken that post out of context. Why didn't you post a link to the thread so other people could have seen the whole thread? Oh right...

2) Large %? Prove it.

If you're going to throw around spurious accusations you should at least have the evidence to back it up.


Part of me is thinking of digging up all that shit jefjef has been flinging to my face, but the larger part just thinks "why bother", I don't need to read his posts anyway.

That's all from me now, I'm going to sit back and watch how long will it take for jefjef to file a ratings abuse report on me...

Re: Natty_dreed

PostPosted: Thu Mar 11, 2010 3:24 pm
by Gold Knight
AAFitz wrote:
the.killing.44 wrote:
Army of GOD wrote:
jefjef wrote:
rutherfoo wrote:Natty dread seems like a good guy to me.
All the posts of his that I've seen have been normal, civil posts.


This is an example of his civil posting. A large % of em are like this.

natty_dread wrote:Let's toss jefjef in the toilet... and see if shit indeed does float...


What else floats?

...

A duck!

Very small rocks


witches


A church!

Also never saw where it was against the rules to change people's quotes or make them up, i do it all the time in fun. Does it really matter that much? If it really bothers someone that much to read it, the foe button does more than just block them from games.. ;)

Re: Natty_dreed

PostPosted: Thu Mar 11, 2010 3:41 pm
by AndyDufresne
Enough with the spam. It's one thing to do it on Off Topics, but in the Cheating and Abuse Forum lets keep it to a minimum. :)


--Andy