Page 1 of 1

whitebuffalo and mrsbaddestbrute[Cleared/noted]e84

PostPosted: Wed Mar 03, 2010 8:44 pm
by Shadow Assassin
I am not completely certaion about this case, but Game 6368098 with whitebuffalo and mrsbaddestbrute has aroused my suspicion. I suspect that the two players I mention might be either involved in a secret diplomacy, or might be the same person with multi-accounts.

Early on in the game, whitebuffalo spent the game building up territory bonuses in the lower right corner of the map. Meanwhile, mrsbaddestbrute exhibited extremely reckless behavior, attacking almost everyone except whitebuffalo, who was clearly winning the game. I should mention that at that it would not have been suicidal for mrsbaddestbrute to attempt an attack on whitebuffalo, but mrsbaddestbrute did not do so, and waited until whitebuffalo had an extreme lead.

When I launched a counter-attack later in the game, I notified the other players in the chat that it would be a good opportunity to attack and weaken whitebuffalo. Unfortunately, mrsbaddestbrute (who takes his/her turn immediately after me) made a really suspicious tactical maneuver that did not weaken whitebuffalo, but rather guarded whitebufaflo from the other player's most direct line of attack. mrsbaddest brute put as many of his/her units as possible between the other player and whitebuffalo.

I would appreciate it if someone could take a look at the game, or at least many do an IP check or something. I know this is really insubstantial evidence, and it may just be me or something.

thanks,
Shadow Assassin

Re: whitebuffalo and mrsbaddestbrute

PostPosted: Wed Mar 03, 2010 10:01 pm
by TheForgivenOne
Shadow Assassin wrote:Accused:
whitebuffalo
mrsbaddestbrute

Accused of: Secret Diplomacy
Being Multi's

Game numbers:
Game 6368098


Comments: I am not completely certaion about this case, but Game 6368098 with whitebuffalo and mrsbaddestbrute has aroused my suspicion. I suspect that the two players I mention might be either involved in a secret diplomacy, or might be the same person with multi-accounts.

Early on in the game, whitebuffalo spent the game building up territory bonuses in the lower right corner of the map. Meanwhile, mrsbaddestbrute exhibited extremely reckless behavior, attacking almost everyone except whitebuffalo, who was clearly winning the game. I should mention that at that it would not have been suicidal for mrsbaddestbrute to attempt an attack on whitebuffalo, but mrsbaddestbrute did not do so, and waited until whitebuffalo had an extreme lead.

When I launched a counter-attack later in the game, I notified the other players in the chat that it would be a good opportunity to attack and weaken whitebuffalo. Unfortunately, mrsbaddestbrute (who takes his/her turn immediately after me) made a really suspicious tactical maneuver that did not weaken whitebuffalo, but rather guarded whitebufaflo from the other player's most direct line of attack. mrsbaddest brute put as many of his/her units as possible between the other player and whitebuffalo.

I would appreciate it if someone could take a look at the game, or at least many do an IP check or something. I know this is really insubstantial evidence, and it may just be me or something.

thanks,
Shadow Assassin


Fixed report

Re: whitebuffalo and mrsbaddestbrute

PostPosted: Sun Mar 07, 2010 11:27 am
by Shadow Assassin
did anyone check this out yet?

Re: whitebuffalo and mrsbaddestbrute[Pending]e84

PostPosted: Sun Mar 07, 2010 5:25 pm
by eye84free
Looking into it at this time.

Eye84free

Re: whitebuffalo and mrsbaddestbrute[Pending]e84

PostPosted: Mon Mar 08, 2010 10:20 pm
by eye84free
As far as being multi accounts, mrsbaddestbrute and whitebuffalo are cleared.

Now ref. Secret Diplomacy. after looking though the game log I dont see enough evidence to warrent such a claim. But i do see enough to atleast note this for future referance.

Therefore they are cleared and noted.

Eye84free

Re: whitebuffalo and mrsbaddestbrute[Cleared/noted]e84

PostPosted: Tue Mar 09, 2010 8:24 pm
by Shadow Assassin
Thanks. its good to get a third party opinion, i guess i was just a bit worked up.