Page 1 of 1

Umfold [warned]es

PostPosted: Fri Feb 26, 2010 10:00 am
by South City
Accused:

Umfold




The accused are suspected of:

Game Chat Abuse



Game number(s):

6527037




Comments:

Umfold and I were having a simple disagreement, but his tone quickly got ugly. He started using excessive hateful, homophobic language. He also shifted the competitive balance of the game by attacking only me.

Example:

2010-02-25 13:51:22 - Umfold: I wasn't snide you ridicoulus faggot. You're just such a fucking douche bag that you have forced me to say this, over and over in a vain hope that you'll understand what you're like. Your faggotry has forced me to stand up, point and shout for all to hear
2010-02-25 13:51:40 - Umfold: "Oh my god, look at this fucking faggot. Can you believe what a fucking loser he is?"
2010-02-25 13:57:08 - Umfold: By the way, Blue? What's wrong with you? You're playing 2 on 1 basically - you can't turn the advantage? Come on!

Re: Umfold

PostPosted: Mon Mar 01, 2010 12:11 am
by soundman
South City wrote:Accused:
Umfold


The accused are suspected of:

Game Chat Abuse


Game number(s):

Game 6527037


Comments:

Umfold and I were having a simple disagreement, but his tone quickly got ugly. He started using excessive hateful, homophobic language. He also shifted the competitive balance of the game by attacking only me.

Example:

2010-02-25 13:51:22 - Umfold: I wasn't snide you ridicoulus faggot. You're just such a fucking douche bag that you have forced me to say this, over and over in a vain hope that you'll understand what you're like. Your faggotry has forced me to stand up, point and shout for all to hear
2010-02-25 13:51:40 - Umfold: "Oh my god, look at this fucking faggot. Can you believe what a fucking loser he is?"
2010-02-25 13:57:08 - Umfold: By the way, Blue? What's wrong with you? You're playing 2 on 1 basically - you can't turn the advantage? Come on!

Added links.

Re: Umfold

PostPosted: Tue Mar 02, 2010 1:19 pm
by Snowgun
2010-02-25 12:21:37 - Umfold: Taking my bonus there when you had so much to lose yourself didn't make much sense to me green. But oh well. ;-)
2010-02-25 12:44:03 - South City: Questioning my strategy there when you're several ranks lower than me didn't much sense to me, red. But oh well ;)
2010-02-25 13:15:09 - Umfold: I've had that rank before. Doesn't mean much to me.
2010-02-25 13:17:30 - South City: My point is, I obviously know what I'm doing, and I've had more success recently than you.
2010-02-25 13:17:40 - South City: So keep your opinions on my gameplay to yourself.
2010-02-25 13:17:57 - Umfold: It was a stupid play.
2010-02-25 13:18:17 - Umfold: And no. My game. I'll comment as I like.
2010-02-25 13:21:17 - South City: I'm sorry, I must have missed the part in the rules where it says whomever starts a game can comment on other player's gameplay with no reprecussions.
2010-02-25 13:21:27 - South City: If I want your opinion, I'll ask for it.
2010-02-25 13:21:30 - South City: Just play the game.
2010-02-25 13:21:37 - Umfold: Worst thing is I even said "Oh well" and added a smiley face to make sure you knew there were no hard feelings - I was just commenting on you breaking my bonus...
2010-02-25 13:22:18 - Umfold: but, from that, you have to act like a total douche bag. One of those losers who takes online Risk WAY too seriously. Just a douche bag loser
2010-02-25 13:23:22 - Umfold: What a fucking homo you are
2010-02-25 13:24:05 - South City: I play this game at work to kill time. I do not take this game seriously. However, I do take offence to people overstepping boundaries and making unsolicited opinions.
2010-02-25 13:24:13 - South City: And now the juvenile name calling.
2010-02-25 13:24:15 - South City: Nice move.
2010-02-25 13:25:12 - Umfold: hey go f*ck yourself you loser. I was friendly - you were a douche bag. Go f*ck yourself you loser homo
2010-02-25 13:26:23 - Umfold: Green: I'm such a loser IRL I have to act like an arrogant douche bag in online risk to keep from killing myself.
2010-02-25 13:26:47 - South City: You are going off the deep end now.
2010-02-25 13:27:03 - South City: There's no call for profanities and name calling.
2010-02-25 13:27:31 - South City: It is not friendly to make unsolicited, unflattering remarks about the actions of a person you've never met.
2010-02-25 13:27:51 - South City: I don't care if there is a stupid smiley face at the end of the statement.
2010-02-25 13:28:15 - Umfold: Yes. You acting like did called for it. Yes it did. Words are words, who cares. It's how you treat peole that matters and I was friendly - you were a douche. f*ck you, loser
2010-02-25 13:28:57 - Umfold: You're the biggest fucking loser I've met in this game. What a fucking homo.
2010-02-25 13:29:50 - South City: Why the homophobic name calling? I don't understand.
2010-02-25 13:33:21 - South City: This conversation may have started with me taking offence to your snide, unsolicited, subjective opinion, but it has truly taken an ugly turn.
2010-02-25 13:51:22 - Umfold: I wasn't snide you ridicoulus faggot. You're just such a fucking douche bag that you have forced me to say this, over and over in a vain hope that you'll understand what you're like. Your faggotry has forced me to stand up, point and shout for all to hear
2010-02-25 13:51:40 - Umfold: "Oh my god, look at this fucking faggot. Can you believe what a fucking loser he is?"
2010-02-25 13:57:08 - Umfold: By the way, Blue? What's wrong with you? You're playing 2 on 1 basically - you can't turn the advantage? Come on!
2010-02-25 14:03:42 - South City: It's okay to disagree with me. It's okay to argue with me. But, the level you've taken it to is not a place I want to go to; now or at any point in the future. I will not converse with anyone who chooses to hate, and use such ugly language.
2010-02-27 14:52:20 - Umfold: Well that was satisfying. Thank you for the help blue.
-blue ends up winning-



Umfolds remarks aside, you did bait and egg him on initially alot, in quite a condescending tone. He was very civil till you pushed him over the edge. Now you both lose and you make a report about him. This report borders on the vindictive.

Re: Umfold

PostPosted: Tue Mar 02, 2010 2:02 pm
by South City
I acknowledged the disagreement. I am not without fault. I took the bait. However, I would like to know exactly when the language that umfold used is acceptable. The answer to that questions, is "never". My jabs never entered the personal arena, and I ceased conversation when the hate speech became prevolent.

As for the vindictive accusation, I can assure you that has no merit. I play this game for fun during my spare time, and losses do not affect me personally at all. I certainly play the games to win the games, but if I were to lose every game I played (fair losses of course), my life would not be affected in a negative way.

If there are no reprecussions for this hate speech, then this website will lose a paying customer.

Re: Umfold

PostPosted: Tue Mar 02, 2010 2:09 pm
by South City
I would also like to submit this snippet taken straight from the guidelines (the emphasis is mine):

In no circumstances is bigotry allowed.

Bigotry includes racism, sexism, ageism, homophobia, religion bashing, lack of religion bashing, or wishing violence on any minority group, etc.

Re: Umfold

PostPosted: Tue Mar 02, 2010 6:12 pm
by Snowgun
South City wrote:I would also like to submit this snippet taken straight from the guidelines (the emphasis is mine):

In no circumstances is bigotry allowed.

Bigotry includes racism, sexism, ageism, homophobia, religion bashing, lack of religion bashing, or wishing violence on any minority group, etc.


While I agree to the offensiveness of his chat, what you have quoted is from the forum and PM/Wall rules. Game chat is usually a different animal, and it is judged leniently. Also, (again I'm just stating past precedent, not my views), there is some discussion as to what constitutes homophobia (in this context persecuting a gay individual) and the use of the type of language umfold employed in your chat log flame war.

i guess we'll see how the mods shake it out.

Re: Umfold

PostPosted: Sun Mar 07, 2010 7:53 pm
by Evil Semp
Snowgun wrote:
South City wrote:I would also like to submit this snippet taken straight from the guidelines (the emphasis is mine):

In no circumstances is bigotry allowed.

Bigotry includes racism, sexism, ageism, homophobia, religion bashing, lack of religion bashing, or wishing violence on any minority group, etc.


While I agree to the offensiveness of his chat, what you have quoted is from the forum and PM/Wall rules. Game chat is usually a different animal, and it is judged leniently. Also, (again I'm just stating past precedent, not my views), there is some discussion as to what constitutes homophobia (in this context persecuting a gay individual) and the use of the type of language umfold employed in your chat log flame war.

i guess we'll see how the mods shake it out.


While judged more leniently and not actively moderated BIGOTRY is not tolerated anywhere on CC.

Umfold has been WARNED.