chevy1269 wrote:game # 6352954 in that game the disappearer made a truce with mr vince wich was legal and i have no problem with it the in his next comment said dorlomin was going to attack chevy1269 and lets see how it works out. so dorlomin did attack me and i asked how he knew he was going to do that i figured he emailed him and chatted outside the room.
1st off we check the games for ourselves, and after I checked this game I can tell you that if this is truly how you took the conversation then you misconstrued it completely. You were by far the superior person in the game at the time Mr.Vince & thedisappearer joined forces in an alliance that was announced in chat. The commemt that you are talking about with dorlomin attacking you was this:
2010-01-30 23:20:53 - Mr.Vince: We've allowed red to become way to strong
2010-01-31 00:00:55 - thedisappearer: Yeah, we wasted a round or to getting here. Blue is the only one who can strike red right now, so hopefully that works out.
What was being said here is that they both felt they waited a round or 2 too late to join forces against you and neither were in a position to attack you, and they were hoping that while blue (dorlomin) was not included in on the truce could still acknowledge the situation and do the best thing for everyone by attacking you. And that's what he did.
chevy1269 wrote:so words went back and forth and game continued then i noticed thedisappearer can attack dorlomin and he never attacks back at all in fact he stoped and never attacked me anymore it just doesnt make sense that he would let the dissappearer get stronger than him and never ever says anything in room. if you could reveiw the game play you would see after i complained he stopped playing but never attacks thedisappearer
Right after the move to take you down a bit that you misunderstood you ranted and raved about them all cheating. You turned a bullseye on your head, and regardless of tactical significance you allowed players to solely target you because of your behavior in chat. It is even said later on by Mr.Vince
2010-02-01 19:08:56 - Mr.Vince: Basically, what I mean is : Be careful when you write something in the game chat because it can have major consequences on the gameplay of others
And looking at the game log and the map currently it appears to me that the 2 in question have their borders stood up against each other more so then anyone else in the game. They exchanged territories here and there, mostly thedisappearer hitting dorlomin but that's because of his location on the board. The location of troops the gameplay of the other 3 and your chat all contributed to you being the sole target of everyone.
There is no secret diplomacy going on here.chevy1269 wrote:i think he uses dorlomin to win games.i would almost bet that if you looked back in other games he flip flops them.
If you had bothered to check then you would see this statement as false, seeing as this is their only game they have played in before.
Both accounts are
cleared of Secret Diplomacy.
thedisappearer is
Cleared of being a multi.
dorlomin is
Busted with other accounts.
While you got lucky here with finding a needle in a haystack Bust with dorlomin there really was no abuse that transpired in the game to even suggest the warrant of this report. Everyone will make their own tactical moves as they see fit. Behaving the way you did in chat allowed for an opportunity for all players to target you regardless of coming out and saying it or not. Hopefully you learn not to jump to the accusation stage too quickly cause it will cost you friends on the site, poor ratings and maybe even some games that you could have won. In regards with the other 2 in your game use the Foe & Ratings systems as you see fit. But be factual.
Closed.
King Sam
