Page 1 of 1
retaliation feedback (WARNED)
Posted:
Wed Jan 20, 2010 9:21 pm
by D-Apocalypse
MUIHIASL
Stars for FAIR PLAY: 0 GAME PLAY: 1 ATTITUDE: 0
"Slow, Backstabber, Coward, Clueless"
This game was won in 10 rounds, i don't appreciate the feedback that was left on my record and ask that it is changed to reflect the game played and or removed totally
Accused: MUIHIASL
Other: unfair, retaliation feedback
Game number(s): 6243207
Re: retaliation feedback
Posted:
Wed Jan 20, 2010 9:25 pm
by colton24
D-Apocalypse wrote:Accused:
MUIHIASLOther: Severe Ratings Abuse
Game number(s):
Game 6243207Comments: This game was won in 10 rounds, i don't appreciate the feedback that was left on my record and ask that it is changed to reflect the game played and or removed totally
I cleaned it up and made it severe ratings abuse since this guy seems to have bad ratings for everyone
Re: retaliation feedback
Posted:
Wed Jan 20, 2010 9:45 pm
by rutherfoo
D-Apocalypse wrote:MUIHIASL
Stars for FAIR PLAY: 0 GAME PLAY: 1 ATTITUDE: 0
"Slow, Backstabber, Coward, Clueless"
This game was won in 10 rounds, i don't appreciate the feedback that was left on my record and ask that it is changed to reflect the game played and or removed totally
Accused: MUIHIASL
Other: unfair, retaliation feedback
Game number(s): 6243207
hahahahha, they won't change it or remove it.
By the way, 0 stars just means they didnt rate you in that category.
Re: retaliation feedback
Posted:
Thu Jan 21, 2010 4:47 pm
by rhp 1
i wish everyone would get over ratings... who cares. you see a game you like... you join. how many people check the ratings of the people who are already in a game, not to mention the players who join after. do you check each person's ratings as they join and drop the game if you don't like what you see?? lol. lighten up. beside's you foed the person and don't have to worry about. and you wrote a response, so anyone as sensitive as you about ratings will see your response and understand what the deal is.
Re: retaliation feedback
Posted:
Thu Jan 21, 2010 4:50 pm
by alex951
rhp 1 wrote:i wish everyone would get over ratings... who cares. you see a game you like... you join. how many people check the ratings of the people who are already in a game, not to mention the players who join after. do you check each person's ratings as they join and drop the game if you don't like what you see?? lol. lighten up. beside's you foed the person and don't have to worry about. and you wrote a response, so anyone as sensitive as you about ratings will see your response and understand what the deal is.
i wouldn't join a game if a player has a 4.0 or lower
Re: retaliation feedback
Posted:
Thu Jan 21, 2010 4:55 pm
by firth4eva
That's not ratings abuse. He can only be arsed leaving it if someone is an arsehole and deserves it.
Re: retaliation feedback
Posted:
Thu Jan 21, 2010 5:11 pm
by rhp 1
alex951 wrote:rhp 1 wrote:i wish everyone would get over ratings... who cares. you see a game you like... you join. how many people check the ratings of the people who are already in a game, not to mention the players who join after. do you check each person's ratings as they join and drop the game if you don't like what you see?? lol. lighten up. beside's you foed the person and don't have to worry about. and you wrote a response, so anyone as sensitive as you about ratings will see your response and understand what the deal is.
i wouldn't join a game if a player has a 4.0 or lower
lmao... well, i don't see a lot of 3's on peoples' ratings, and i understand why you wouldn't... but seriously? just smoke em, foe em if you don't like their play, and move on.
Re: retaliation feedback
Posted:
Thu Jan 21, 2010 10:55 pm
by Queen_Herpes
alex951 wrote:rhp 1 wrote:i wish everyone would get over ratings... who cares. you see a game you like... you join. how many people check the ratings of the people who are already in a game, not to mention the players who join after. do you check each person's ratings as they join and drop the game if you don't like what you see?? lol. lighten up. beside's you foed the person and don't have to worry about. and you wrote a response, so anyone as sensitive as you about ratings will see your response and understand what the deal is.
i wouldn't join a game if a player has a 4.0 or lower
Its probably pretty hard to get an overall rating of 4.0 or lower simply because you are beating players and they are retaliating with low rating stars. There are far fewer players who give undeserved low ratings compared to players who are receiving ratings because of some negative behavior.
Re: retaliation feedback
Posted:
Fri Jan 22, 2010 11:55 am
by rhp 1
alex951 wrote:rhp 1 wrote:i wish everyone would get over ratings... who cares. you see a game you like... you join. how many people check the ratings of the people who are already in a game, not to mention the players who join after. do you check each person's ratings as they join and drop the game if you don't like what you see?? lol. lighten up. beside's you foed the person and don't have to worry about. and you wrote a response, so anyone as sensitive as you about ratings will see your response and understand what the deal is.
i wouldn't join a game if a player has a 4.0 or lower
and more to the point, if a random player gave you an inappropriate rating, that wouldn't affect your overall rating to any great extent. and as far as i've seen, players who have low ratings deserve them, meaning they consistently receive justifiably low ratings, not the unjustified 1 star across the board rating that we've all recieved from time to time.
Re: retaliation feedback
Posted:
Fri Jan 22, 2010 2:51 pm
by Snowgun
rhp 1 wrote:alex951 wrote:rhp 1 wrote:i wish everyone would get over ratings... who cares. you see a game you like... you join. how many people check the ratings of the people who are already in a game, not to mention the players who join after. do you check each person's ratings as they join and drop the game if you don't like what you see?? lol. lighten up. beside's you foed the person and don't have to worry about. and you wrote a response, so anyone as sensitive as you about ratings will see your response and understand what the deal is.
i wouldn't join a game if a player has a 4.0 or lower
lmao... well, i don't see a lot of 3's on peoples' ratings, and i understand why you wouldn't... but seriously? just smoke em, foe em if you don't like their play, and move on.
I personally have a 4.3 threshold. And the reason is that they are more likely to suicide, deadbeat, team kill, ect. so that even playing one game with them is unpleasant.
Re: retaliation feedback
Posted:
Fri Jan 22, 2010 3:20 pm
by rhp 1
Snowgun wrote:rhp 1 wrote:alex951 wrote:rhp 1 wrote:i wish everyone would get over ratings... who cares. you see a game you like... you join. how many people check the ratings of the people who are already in a game, not to mention the players who join after. do you check each person's ratings as they join and drop the game if you don't like what you see?? lol. lighten up. beside's you foed the person and don't have to worry about. and you wrote a response, so anyone as sensitive as you about ratings will see your response and understand what the deal is.
i wouldn't join a game if a player has a 4.0 or lower
lmao... well, i don't see a lot of 3's on peoples' ratings, and i understand why you wouldn't... but seriously? just smoke em, foe em if you don't like their play, and move on.
I personally have a 4.3 threshold. And the reason is that they are more likely to suicide, deadbeat, team kill, ect. so that even playing one game with them is unpleasant.
thats my point Snow, if their rating is under 4.3 then they receive consistent justifiably poor ratings, not 1 star across the board by a random person now and then (which seems to be what this is all about
)
Re: retaliation feedback
Posted:
Fri Jan 22, 2010 3:24 pm
by firth4eva
rhp 1 wrote:Snowgun wrote:rhp 1 wrote:alex951 wrote:rhp 1 wrote:i wish everyone would get over ratings... who cares. you see a game you like... you join. how many people check the ratings of the people who are already in a game, not to mention the players who join after. do you check each person's ratings as they join and drop the game if you don't like what you see?? lol. lighten up. beside's you foed the person and don't have to worry about. and you wrote a response, so anyone as sensitive as you about ratings will see your response and understand what the deal is.
i wouldn't join a game if a player has a 4.0 or lower
lmao... well, i don't see a lot of 3's on peoples' ratings, and i understand why you wouldn't... but seriously? just smoke em, foe em if you don't like their play, and move on.
I personally have a 4.3 threshold. And the reason is that they are more likely to suicide, deadbeat, team kill, ect. so that even playing one game with them is unpleasant.
thats my point Snow, if their rating is under 4.3 then they receive consistent justifiably poor ratings, not 1 star across the board by a random person now and then (which seems to be what this is all about
)
So you are saying 3 is a poor rating?
Re: retaliation feedback
Posted:
Fri Jan 22, 2010 3:27 pm
by bigg chief
Re: retaliation feedback
Posted:
Fri Jan 22, 2010 3:35 pm
by rhp 1
damn straight chief! my point was just that random poor ratings by vindictive players have a small impact on someone's overall ratings. and you can respond to them if you wish, and the person looking at them can check the game and make up their own minds.... this is gettin funny. just ban the dude and revoke his premium status, and then hit him in the head like a baby seal. lmao
Re: retaliation feedback
Posted:
Fri Jan 22, 2010 4:00 pm
by rhp 1
MUIHIASL - Rating Abuse
Posted:
Fri Jan 22, 2010 4:33 pm
by HairyP
MUIHIASLRatings Abuse - See player's ratings left.
Comments: I beat this player in a Quad game and he left myself and the other members of my team bad ratings and tags. I felt by the chat in game everyone was having fun, but i guess not. I also looked at the ratings that he had left other players and i saw the samething. I'm not one to really do something like that but i just fell that taking your anger about losing out on someones ratings is wrong.
Thanks
HP
Re: retaliation feedback
Posted:
Fri Jan 22, 2010 10:34 pm
by Snowgun
There is currently another rating report on this guy.
I hear what RHP 1 is saying. If someone throws a 1's rating at someone, get over it. It happened, it's not gonna affect your score, and it was just a rare bad deal.
HOWEVER, this guy throws 1's at everyone, and thats a problem. This is different than someone giving 1's to someone, even if it was retaliatory, every once in a while (but rarely).
Re: retaliation feedback
Posted:
Sat Jan 23, 2010 3:45 pm
by rhp 1
Snowgun wrote:There is currently another rating report on this guy.
I hear what RHP 1 is saying. If someone throws a 1's rating at someone, get over it. It happened, it's not gonna affect your score, and it was just a rare bad deal.
HOWEVER, this guy throws 1's at everyone, and thats a problem. This is different than someone giving 1's to someone, even if it was retaliatory, every once in a while (but rarely).
Snow... you're a 100% right... if someone gives ones to everyone with no cause, something should be done. i guess my point was a lot of people are a little too sensitive about ratings and such, but in this case... it's a little much. lol
Re: retaliation feedback (WARNED)
Posted:
Sat Jan 30, 2010 11:47 pm
by Evil Semp
MUIHIASL has been WARNED.