Conquer Club

<DELETE ME>
PLACE THE NAME OF THE ACCUSED IN THE SUBJECT LINE!!!

Replace or delete any xxxxxxx with the appropriate information.
Delete any accusations or entries which do not apply.

Be sure before you accuse someone!
</DELETE ME>

Accused ykgreg ykgreg, ykgreg

xxxxxxx
xxxxxxx
xxxxxxx



The accused are suspected of:

Being Multis
Conducting Secret Diplomacy
Severe PM Abuse
Other: <Explanation>



Game number(s):

[game]xxxxxxx[/game]
[game]xxxxxxx[/game]
[game]xxxxxxx[/game]
[game]xxxxxxx[/game]



Comments:

i really hope ur going to edit that lol... all u got is a player name accusing them of everything with no games or comments..

Accused

ykgreg
niceguyeddy

The accused are suspected of:

Secret Diplomacy



Game number(s):

Game 6216609



Comments:

Side note:
jotheconquerer pasted this on yellows wall. niceguyeddy

wow you are an idiot red has two bonus you smash into mgood for you

by jotheconqueror
on Fri Jan 08, 2010 7:01 pm

jefjef

i believe that was the point, jefjef is just pointing out the accuser secret diplomacy or attempt..

so the accuser is also accusing themselves? How noble

BoganGod wrote:so the accuser is also accusing themselves? How noble

Yes very honorable. I do hope CC takes that into account and not punish him for filing a spurious complaint.

LOL i knew i shouldnt have done this in the game chat i ask if anyone plans to help with red then yellow replies yeah ill help red...i posted on his wall out of frustration i didnt asj him to do anythng i just called him an idiot the issue here is what he wrote in chat

wow you are an idiot red has two bonus you smash into mgood for you


Well I interpret what you said as saying and meaning:

WOW. You are an idiot. Red has two bonuses. If you smash into him then good for you.

This is what I believe you said in broken English which would be a diplomacy/strategic recommendation.

jefjef wrote:wow you are an idiot red has two bonus you smash into mgood for you


Well I interpret what you said as saying and meaning:

WOW. You are an idiot. Red has two bonuses. If you smash into him then good for you.

This is what I believe you said in broken English which would be a diplomacy/strategic recommendation.

i read

"Wow. you are an idiot. Red has two bonuses and you smashed into me. Good for you"

VampireM wrote:

jefjef wrote:wow you are an idiot red has two bonus you smash into mgood for you


Well I interpret what you said as saying and meaning:

WOW. You are an idiot. Red has two bonuses. If you smash into him then good for you.

This is what I believe you said in broken English which would be a diplomacy/strategic recommendation.

i read

"Wow. you are an idiot. Red has two bonuses and you smashed into me. Good for you"

Very well could be. Missing letters and what not. Hard to say. You maybe correct.

Still. Why a wall post and not game chat? Trying to redirect his strategies would be my guess.

"wow you are an idiot red has two bonus you smash into mgood for you ." there was no diplomacy in that jef the guy had already screwed me and i was letting him know that was a smart move. so i dont know how you get diplomacy jeff god theres so many idiots on this.mAYBE ITS my fault for not filling this thing out right but still i get double team in a game and insult the guy who gives the game away on his wall and thats diplomacy? and secret?if it was secret how did you see it jeff. because its not secret. and stop misquoting me i never wrote "if" as in if you attack him good for you.

jotheconqueror wrote:"wow you are an idiot red has two bonus you smash into mgood for you ." there was no diplomacy in that jef the guy had already screwed me and i was letting him know that was a smart move. so i dont know how you get diplomacy jeff god theres so many idiots on this.mAYBE ITS my fault for not filling this thing out right but still i get double team in a game and insult the guy who gives the game away on his wall and thats diplomacy? and secret?if it was secret how did you see it jeff. because its not secret. and stop misquoting me i never wrote "if" as in if you attack him good for you.

Any diplomacy/strategic communication outside of game chat between opponents, even if you do it on tv or via bill boards, is considered secret diplomacy.

I believe now you did not intend a cheat. Still odd to me that you did not put that in chat.

Also I might add that 3 player crap always is lopsided. You won't see me or a lot of others playing them cuz even if there is no cheating it sure can seem like it.

ok thanks but in chat of the game i ask is anyone gonz help with red he replies yes ill help red does that count for anything? thats why i reported this also being my first time i did a horrible job filling it out

jotheconqueror wrote:ok thanks but in chat of the game i ask is anyone gonz help with red he replies yes ill help red does that count for anything? thats why i reported this also being my first time i did a horrible job filling it out

I fixed your complaint.

As far as what red says. Looks like a no.

You should do a game search to see if these two play a lot together. That would be the only basis of a complaint you would have. IMO.

On 6Jan you ask for help against red. On 8Jan you post on someones wall that they are an idiot for not trying to break red bonuses but you didn't appear to try to break red either. In face to took two of yellows countries and two of blues countries [blue had missed two turns in a row], yellow attacks you for payback? Then red proceeds to eliminate blue for his cards? And you blame yellow for this?

I don't see any secret diplomacy between yellow and red.
ykgreg and niceguyeddy are CLEARED of secret diplomacy.

And please next time if you have a complaint YOU should take the time to fill out the form properly and not rely on others to do what you should have done.

Thanks jefjef for fixing the form.