Conquer Club

I propose that we..

-Let members post suspicions about multi's/secret allies

-Let those who have additional evidence to produce it

-Let the accused member(s) post a defense

Anything else is just a waste of time and space

-Those who oppose said such allegations or support the"accused" member(s) should: await the Administrations decision on the "said offending" member(s) offense before jumping to the defense ->Remember all those who ran to the defense of MedleOfHonour and dminus(I too could not believe dminus was multi...played him{or he played me?})


Hey then maybe I'll shut up...gotta be worth the thought...

And we can save these guys(Admin) redundant reading...Did I mention I'll shut up?

LetGodSortThem wrote:I propose that we..

-Let members post suspicions about multi's/secret allies

-Let those who have additional evidence to produce it

-Let the accused member(s) post a defense

Anything else is just a waste of time and space

-Those who oppose said such allegations or support the"accused" member(s) should: await the Administrations decision on the "said offending" member(s) offense before jumping to the defense ->Remember all those who ran to the defense of MedleOfHonour and dminus(I too could not believe dminus was multi...played him{or he played me?})


Hey then maybe I'll shut up...gotta be worth the thought...

And we can save these guys(Admin) redundant reading...Did I mention I'll shut up?

I agree with the first part, but if people want to go to the defense, of someone they played, and thought, wasn't a multi, they should be able, too. Though, that would be no reason for a check not to be done.

Waste of time... i would have supported dminus...till i saw the evidence...trust admin...
Lets save them unnecessary reading..

LetGodSortThem wrote:Waste of time... i would have supported dminus...till i saw the evidence...trust admin...

even if you think it's a waste of time not everybody does.

Set up a poll then...But I bet Admin would rather not have too read peoples opinions...than solid proof...

Power too yo bro...stick up for your thoughts...

LetGodSortThem wrote:Set up a poll then...But I bet Admin would rather not have too read peoples opinions...than solid proof...

Admin only have to look at the facts, peoples opinions are way from the proof, it can be looked at it can be ingored, it doesn't change the facts.

When they have to weed through 5-10-20 posts...

OK I won't shut up...hee hee

i dought they look at all the post anyways, they just look at the ip adresses or w/e they do and then they say if they wer busted or not.

Reposting busted demonville...

Scammed me and how many others???