Conquer Club

6171650 secret diplomacy or ally?
thank you for to take a look in to

you need to use the form to get them to look at this.

yes you need to use the form provided to you when you open up a claim in here so we know exactly what it is that you are wishing for us to check.

Code: Select all

Accused:
[player]xxxxxxx[/player]
[player]xxxxxxx[/player]

The accused are suspected of:
Being Multis
Conducting Secret Diplomacy
Severe PM Abuse
Other: <Explanation>

Game number(s):
[game]xxxxxxx[/game]

Comments:


KS

Accused:

rwbthecwb
suparolo

The accused are suspected of:

Conducting Secret Diplomacy

Game Numbers:

Game 6171650


Comments: They haven't attacked me for a long time.

Accused:

rwbthecwb
suparolo

The accused are suspected of:

Conducting Secret Diplomacy

Game Numbers:

Game 6171650


Comments: They haven't attacked eachother for a long time.

gracias

Mesalina wrote:Accused:

rwbthecwb
suparolo


The accused are suspected of:

Conducting Secret Diplomacy


Game Numbers:

Game 6171650


Comments: They haven't attacked eachother for a long time.

Fixed with links - merge with other thread.

Thanks for the correct format, or attempt at it Mesalina, but next time just edit the post instead of making a whole other thread. And try to provide more evidence then "they havent attacked each other in a long time"

Thanks guys for the links as always.

Verdict:

Neither one have prior SD charges.
Neither one have played in a game other then this one together.
The reasoning why they went a couple of rounds without attacking each other is simple. If you notice red (rwbthecwb) went several rounds without attacking at all, trying to mount an offensive attack in this no spoils bout. And suparolo attacked you where he needed to so he could try to reclaim a bonus that you took from him and try to even it out.

It would take more then this to justify actions taken against these 2 for secret diplomacy.

Cleared

KS

Thank you