Page 1 of 1

kumandgo / kumandgo13 [CLEARED]

PostPosted: Thu Dec 17, 2009 8:58 pm
by KraphtOne
Accused:

kumandgo
kumandgo13


The accused are suspected of:

Being Multis



Comments: playing a 3 player assassin game with kumandgo13 and shipmthisway, and on the first round they both attack me... which kinda makes me turn my head and furrow my eye brows a bit...

so i look and shipmthisway has played 98 games and 48 of them involve kumandgo13... but the real treat was that i accidently typed kumandgo (without the 13) first and noticed that shipmthisway had also played 3 games with that player as well...

maybe it's just an amazing coincidence... but i have a feeling i'll be getting the "we are brothers" thing...

Re: kumandgo / kumandgo13

PostPosted: Thu Dec 17, 2009 9:07 pm
by JOHNNYROCKET24
kumandgo last time on the site was

Last visited:
Sat Jun 06, 2009 6:28 pm

So if it is a multi than he hasnt used the account for over 6 months.

kumandgo13 and shipmthisway are not multis

Game 6051608

2009-12-05 00:12:05 - Incrementing game to round 6
2009-12-05 00:12:47 - shipmthisway received 5 troops for 17 regions
2009-12-05 00:12:57 - shipmthisway cashed in a group of Georgia, Wisconsin, and Washington worth 10 troops
2009-12-05 00:13:10 - kumandgo13 received 2 troops for holding West
2009-12-05 00:13:10 - kumandgo13 received 5 troops for 15 regions
2009-12-05 00:13:20 - kumandgo13 deployed 7 troops on New York
2009-12-05 00:13:22 - kumandgo13 assaulted Pennsylvania from New York and conquered it from shipmthisway
2009-12-05 00:13:24 - shipmthisway deployed 10 troops on Idaho

2009-12-05 00:13:25 - kumandgo13 assaulted Ohio from Pennsylvania and conquered it from shipmthisway
2009-12-05 00:13:42 - kumandgo13 reinforced Alabama with 4 troops from Mississippi
2009-12-05 00:13:42 - kumandgo13 ended the turn and got spoils
2009-12-05 00:14:02 - shipmthisway deployed 5 troops on Texas
2009-12-05 00:14:07 - shipmthisway assaulted Washington from Idaho and conquered it from kumandgo13
2009-12-05 00:14:11 - shipmthisway assaulted Oregon from Washington and conquered it from kumandgo13
2009-12-05 00:14:16 - shipmthisway assaulted California from Oregon and conquered it from kumandgo13
2009-12-05 00:14:22 - shipmthisway assaulted Nevada from California and conquered it from kumandgo13
2009-12-05 00:14:33 - shipmthisway assaulted Oklahoma from Texas and conquered it from kumandgo13
2009-12-05 00:14:56 - shipmthisway assaulted Arkansas from Oklahoma and conquered it from neutral player
2009-12-05 00:15:01 - shipmthisway assaulted Mississippi from Arkansas and conquered it from kumandgo13
2009-12-05 00:15:50 - shipmthisway reinforced Indiana with 4 troops from Utah
2009-12-05 00:15:50 - shipmthisway ended the turn and got spoils

Re: kumandgo / kumandgo13

PostPosted: Thu Dec 17, 2009 9:14 pm
by KraphtOne
JOHNNYROCKET24 wrote:kumandgo13 and shipmthisway are not multis



didnt say they were

Re: kumandgo / kumandgo13

PostPosted: Fri Dec 18, 2009 8:07 am
by magicc
It could also mean that when kumandgo13 was about to register, he could not take the kumandgo name because it was already taken then he just added a number so he could still use it.

Re: kumandgo / kumandgo13

PostPosted: Fri Dec 18, 2009 11:48 am
by Snowgun
Kumandgo13 started his account in march of 2009.

Kumandgo last visited in June of 2009.

I just played a game with Kum13 and ship last night. They arn't multi's (and K1 didn't say this), but I think that Kum didn't like the first account he had, or wanted to have a higher rank and get away from those initall NOOB learning losses, so he made a new premium account.

Re: kumandgo / kumandgo13

PostPosted: Fri Dec 18, 2009 1:38 pm
by JOHNNYROCKET24
Snowgun wrote:Kumandgo13 started his account in march of 2009.

Kumandgo last visited in June of 2009.

I just played a game with Kum13 and ship last night. They arn't multi's (and K1 didn't say this), but I think that Kum didn't like the first account he had, or wanted to have a higher rank and get away from those initall NOOB learning losses, so he made a new premium account.

good job in rewording all the info I already provided.

Re: kumandgo / kumandgo13

PostPosted: Fri Dec 18, 2009 1:45 pm
by Aalmeida17
what is the game of this report?

Re: kumandgo / kumandgo13

PostPosted: Fri Dec 18, 2009 1:51 pm
by JOHNNYROCKET24
Aalmeida17 wrote:what is the game of this report?


Game 6128243

Re: kumandgo / kumandgo13

PostPosted: Fri Dec 18, 2009 2:08 pm
by Snowgun
JOHNNYROCKET24 wrote:
Snowgun wrote:Kumandgo13 started his account in march of 2009.

Kumandgo last visited in June of 2009.

I just played a game with Kum13 and ship last night. They arn't multi's (and K1 didn't say this), but I think that Kum didn't like the first account he had, or wanted to have a higher rank and get away from those initall NOOB learning losses, so he made a new premium account.

good job in rewording all the info I already provided.



:lol: Whoops, didn't see your line about the 6 months thing, I was just making an observation based on the game I just had with them. Good think the Private Dick Jonny R is on the case, i'll sit back and let you handle the reigns. :D

Re: kumandgo / kumandgo13

PostPosted: Fri Dec 18, 2009 2:18 pm
by Masli
Snowgun wrote:
JOHNNYROCKET24 wrote:
Snowgun wrote:Kumandgo13 started his account in march of 2009.

Kumandgo last visited in June of 2009.

I just played a game with Kum13 and ship last night. They arn't multi's (and K1 didn't say this), but I think that Kum didn't like the first account he had, or wanted to have a higher rank and get away from those initall NOOB learning losses, so he made a new premium account.

good job in rewording all the info I already provided.



:lol: Whoops, didn't see your line about the 6 months thing, I was just making an observation based on the game I just had with them. Good think the Private Dick Jonny R is on the case, i'll sit back and let you handle the reigns. :D


so, thats a multi

Yes he did
The accused are suspected of:

Being Multis


and what's up with :
Private Dick Jonny R

Re: kumandgo / kumandgo13

PostPosted: Fri Dec 18, 2009 5:54 pm
by Snowgun
Masli wrote:
Snowgun wrote:
JOHNNYROCKET24 wrote:
Snowgun wrote:Kumandgo13 started his account in march of 2009.

Kumandgo last visited in June of 2009.

I just played a game with Kum13 and ship last night. They arn't multi's (and K1 didn't say this), but I think that Kum didn't like the first account he had, or wanted to have a higher rank and get away from those initall NOOB learning losses, so he made a new premium account.

good job in rewording all the info I already provided.



:lol: Whoops, didn't see your line about the 6 months thing, I was just making an observation based on the game I just had with them. Good think the Private Dick Jonny R is on the case, i'll sit back and let you handle the reigns. :D


so, thats a multi

Yes he did
The accused are suspected of:

Being Multis


Wut? :-s ahhh, yea....?

?

Oh. I see now, cute little color coding! Here, look:


Kraftone wrote:
JOHNNYROCKET24 wrote:kumandgo13 and shipmthisway are not multis



didnt say they were


Masli wrote:and what's up with :
Private Dick Jonny R


Just saying Johnny was kinda being a great, big, private eye! ;) ..... :lol:

Re: kumandgo / kumandgo13

PostPosted: Fri Dec 18, 2009 7:15 pm
by KraphtOne
yes clearly he was going to buy premium and said "to hell with it" and just started another account....

his first 3 games were on feudal war map...

guess who won?

the whole scoring system would be moot if everyone were allowed to just restart their account or rejoin under a new name whenever they wanted... do you REALLY want it to be like yahoo?

Re: kumandgo / kumandgo13

PostPosted: Sat Dec 19, 2009 1:10 pm
by Snowgun
KraphtOne wrote:
the whole scoring system would be moot if everyone were allowed to just restart their account or rejoin under a new name whenever they wanted... do you REALLY want it to be like yahoo?


yea, ... Good point

Re: kumandgo / kumandgo13

PostPosted: Sun Dec 20, 2009 8:38 pm
by Evil Semp
Right now there just isn't enough to prove they are multi's. Maybe if kumandgo comes back to play we can come up with more proof. CLEARED

Re: kumandgo / kumandgo13

PostPosted: Sun Dec 20, 2009 8:43 pm
by KraphtOne
Evil Semp wrote:Right now there just isn't enough to prove they are multi's. Maybe if kumandgo comes back to play we can come up with more proof. CLEARED


have to disagree...

i mean, while you can't prove that they are the same person...

clearly kumandgo13 is a multi, based on his first few games he played...

should be able to bust someone even if they arent dumb enough to use the same IP with 2 accounts...

but who cares, nothing REALLY happens when someone is busted anyway...

this should be marked as "noted" not cleared at the very least...

Re: kumandgo / kumandgo13 [CLEARED]

PostPosted: Sun Dec 20, 2009 8:53 pm
by KraphtOne
funny thing is the guy he played his first 3 games against looks like he's a multi too lol

Re: kumandgo / kumandgo13

PostPosted: Mon Dec 21, 2009 12:37 am
by JOHNNYROCKET24
KraphtOne wrote:
Evil Semp wrote:Right now there just isn't enough to prove they are multi's. Maybe if kumandgo comes back to play we can come up with more proof. CLEARED


have to disagree...

i mean, while you can't prove that they are the same person...

clearly kumandgo13 is a multi, based on his first few games he played...

should be able to bust someone even if they arent dumb enough to use the same IP with 2 accounts...

but who cares, nothing REALLY happens when someone is busted anyway...

this should be marked as "noted" not cleared at the very least...


lol...no comment