Conquer Club

Posted: **Mon Dec 07, 2009 1:30 pm**

Accused:

[NBK]xSUPERDUDEx
[NBK]xTEASLEYx
KT0280

The accused are suspected of:

Being Multis
Or possibly Secret Demopolocy, but I doubt it.

Game number(s):
3 player with [NBK]xSUPERDUDEx & KT0280
[game6011818][/game] Once the 3rd player is eliminated, every single one of their turns was 1 minute apart. And while the 3rd guy was in there, they mostly bgoth attacked him. Or KT0280 mostly attacked them both to gain an advantage, while [NBK]xSUPERDUDEx was doing the dirty work weakening the 3rd player.

2 player with [NBK]xSUPERDUDEx & KT0280
Game 6012248 [NBK]xSUPERDUDEx attacks mostly neutrals, basically giving KT0280 the win. Yet again, taking turns minutes apart.

3 player with all 3 accused.
Game 6017413 [NBK]xTEASLEYx & [NBK]xSUPERDUDEx mostly attack each other the whole game, leaving KT0280 to easily take the win. Taking turns minutes apart from each other.

8 player with both [NBK]xSUPERDUDEx & KT0280
Game 6022780 [NBK]xSUPERDUDEx is protecting KT0280's bonus, while he is holding SA, while the only thing keeping him from breaking it is a 1, which isdn't bad odds with 7v1. Once again, not too much time between their turns.

Freestyle doubles with both KT0280 & [NBK]xTEASLEYx
Game 6039176
Playing one minute apart each turn. Enough time for a newb to sign out, and back in.

2 player with both [NBK]xTEASLEYx & [NBK]xSUPERDUDEx
Game 6016686 It's freestyle, and they still always play one right after the other, not verry much time apart.

2 player with both [NBK]xTEASLEYx & [NBK]xSUPERDUDEx
Game 6006581 It's freestyle, and they still always play one right after the other, not verry much time apart.

4 player 2.1 assassin with [NBK]xTEASLEYx & [NBK]xSUPERDUDEx
Game 6005435 Must I explain? Red said it in the game chat himself. ^-^

3 player freestyle with both [NBK]xTEASLEYx & [NBK]xSUPERDUDEx
Game 3749243 Same as before. both basically worked together, and played one after the other, with enough time to sign in and out.

1v1 with both [NBK]xTEASLEYx & [NBK]xSUPERDUDEx
Game 3743901 Need I explain it again? Same as always.

1v1 with both [NBK]xTEASLEYx & [NBK]xSUPERDUDEx
Game 3743830 Same as the last. ^-^

3 player with both [NBK]xTEASLEYx & [NBK]xSUPERDUDEx
Game 3743493 Need I explain? Same as every other 3 player game these cheaters were in.
Comments:

All comments are above. And the fact that both [NBK]xSUPERDUDEx and [NBK]xTEASLEYx joined the same day, and KT0280 joined one day before.

Can someone say busted already? haha

Posted: **Mon Dec 07, 2009 1:33 pm**

Ok. Lets not have any bullshit here people. haha. It took time for me to come up with this lame info!!!!! And the fact that I'm also drunk, so it took even longer.

Posted: **Mon Dec 07, 2009 1:52 pm**

I'm in one the games with these two. Game 6022780 I questioned[NBK]xSUPERDUDEx about his weird play in this game and here is the response i got;

2009-12-04 20:37:00 - Hsur: Just a question................Superdude, why block for KT0280? Why not break his bonus?
2009-12-06 19:13:18 - [NBK]xSUPERDUDEx: i would but i have a different strategy...if i do then i lose troops i gain then destro
2009-12-06 23:13:44 - Hsur: It wouldn't take much.

Don't know what he exactly meant by the bolded part.

I know this is an escalating game and bonuses don't figure into who wins most of the time, but to let someone keep a bonus when there is a 7 v 1 is just bad play or secret diplomacy or multi playing. I'm leaning towards the multi part myself.

Posted: **Mon Dec 07, 2009 2:41 pm**

i smell multi here. they're game play reeks of it

Posted: **Mon Dec 07, 2009 3:06 pm**

gcwca_4_life wrote:Ok. Lets not have any bullshit here people. haha. It took time for me to come up with this lame info!!!!! And the fact that I'm also drunk, so it took even longer.

You are drunk at 12:33 p.m.? Impressive.

Posted: **Mon Dec 07, 2009 6:34 pm**

angola wrote:
gcwca_4_life wrote:Ok. Lets not have any bullshit here people. haha. It took time for me to come up with this lame info!!!!! And the fact that I'm also drunk, so it took even longer.

You are drunk at 12:33 p.m.? Impressive.

I've been drunk all day. Want a cup???

Hmmm. Looks like this may take a while...

Posted: **Mon Dec 07, 2009 6:45 pm**

You are my hero, to be spotting multi's in your condition

Posted: **Mon Dec 07, 2009 7:07 pm**

alex951 wrote:i smell multi here. they're game play reeks of it

Posted: **Tue Dec 08, 2009 12:43 pm**

Come on!!! I give all this info, and it's not even pending yet?!?!?!

:cry:

Posted: **Tue Dec 08, 2009 3:40 pm**

just because they haven't labeled it pending doesn't mean they arn't already discussing it... they will post something soon enough..

Posted: **Tue Dec 08, 2009 7:12 pm**

VampireM wrote:just because they haven't labeled it pending doesn't mean they arn't already discussing it... they will post something soon enough..

I know! I know! Can't a drunk man hassle the mods when he wants to?

Posted: **Tue Dec 08, 2009 8:21 pm**

lol he sure can, just thought i would ease ur mind... but go to town

Posted: **Tue Dec 08, 2009 8:41 pm**

These accounts say they are family, all playing from the same comp. If they don't get busted for multiple accounts, they should at least be warned and blocked from playing against each other.

Posted from game chat:Game 6022780

009-12-08 02:43:06 - [NBK]xSUPERDUDEx: i hjad this account for almost a year...i just stopped playing for a while so i just started playing again
2009-12-08 02:43:46 - [NBK]xSUPERDUDEx: and yes me and kt0280 are family but we play as a competition and fight eachother
2009-12-08 02:44:14 - [NBK]xSUPERDUDEx: we take turns so quick because were usually on the computer at the same time

Posted: **Tue Dec 08, 2009 10:17 pm**

VampireM wrote:lol he sure can, just thought i would ease ur mind... but go to town

Want a drink? got plenty? Vodka? Beer? Whiskey?

Ok. More for me. haha

Hsur wrote:These accounts say they are family, all playing from the same comp. If they don't get busted for multiple accounts, they should at least be warned and blocked from playing against each other.

Posted from game chat:Game 6022780

009-12-08 02:43:06 - [NBK]xSUPERDUDEx: i hjad this account for almost a year...i just stopped playing for a while so i just started playing again
2009-12-08 02:43:46 - [NBK]xSUPERDUDEx: and yes me and kt0280 are family but we play as a competition and fight eachother
2009-12-08 02:44:14 - [NBK]xSUPERDUDEx: we take turns so quick because were usually on the computer at the same time

bullocks. He talks crap! lol. CONSPIRACY!!!!!!!!!!!!!

CONSPIRACY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

CONSPIRACY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

lol

Posted: **Tue Dec 08, 2009 11:14 pm**

I didn't say I agree..........This is what I think of these accounts. :^o

So on the conspiracy theory, count me out.

Posted: **Wed Dec 09, 2009 12:21 am**

Hsur wrote:I didn't say I agree..........This is what I think of these accounts.

So on the conspiracy theory, count me out.

Aaaw. So your not gonna back me up with the conspiracy theory?

Damn. NVM.

Forgot it takes up to 5 people for a conspiracy. haha

Posted: **Wed Dec 09, 2009 4:30 am**

you're being tag-teamed...any "family/friends' playing from teh same puta should state this at the outset./..(don't know if policy or just ettiquette)...I have done with family before but at least that was in "team games"...(didn't help much still got wiped bu to King herpes credit he at least let my ten yr old take him out--when he knew the win was assurred0..;.these guys smell like rotten fish...another bourbon should help...

Posted: **Wed Dec 09, 2009 9:46 pm**

gcwca_4_life wrote:
Hsur wrote:I didn't say I agree..........This is what I think of these accounts.

So on the conspiracy theory, count me out.

Aaaw. So your not gonna back me up with the conspiracy theory?

Damn. NVM.

Forgot it takes up to 5 people for a conspiracy. haha

Ok,count me back in. Here's my conspiracy theory. They know each other and conducted secret diplomacy, or the accounts are multiple accounts. Either way, they have, IMO, cheated.