Page 1 of 1

jaunelis20 and tiurkas [cleared & noted]

PostPosted: Tue Oct 27, 2009 9:09 am
by John_Cocktolstoy
Accused:
jaunelis20 and tiurkas


The accused are suspected of:
Being Multis
Conducting Secret Diplomacy


Game number(s):
5816834


Comments:
While I don't have any proof that these players are mutlis, they do come from the same country and tiurka's first 27 games were all played against jaunelis20. In our game (Feudal War), both players expanded and developed early without attacking each other before converging on me and destroying me. They did not discuss any strategies amongst themselves in the game chat, and since they have played so many games together in the past I cannot reasonably conclude that their strategies were fully disclosed.

Many thanks,

John Cocktolstoy

Re: jaunelis20 and tiurkas

PostPosted: Tue Oct 27, 2009 9:20 am
by John_Cocktolstoy
Correction: They haven't yet eliminated me from our game. They are now attacking only neutral terits (not attacking themselves or me) - this one I must admit I cannot understand.

Thanks,

John Cocktolstoy

Re: jaunelis20 and tiurkas

PostPosted: Tue Oct 27, 2009 9:21 am
by Darthvadar
jaunelis20 and tiurkas


The accused are suspected of:
Being Multis
Conducting Secret Diplomacy



Game 5816834


Comments:
While I don't have any proof that these players are mutlis, they do come from the same country and tiurka's first 27 games were all played against jaunelis20. In our game (Feudal War), both players expanded and developed early without attacking each other before converging on me and destroying me. They did not discuss any strategies amongst themselves in the game chat, and since they have played so many games together in the past I cannot reasonably conclude that their strategies were fully disclosed.

Many thanks,

John_Cocktolstoy

with links ;)

Re: jaunelis20 and tiurkas [pending]

PostPosted: Thu Oct 29, 2009 9:23 pm
by Evil Semp
juanelis20 and tiurkas are CLEARED of being multi's.

At this time I don't feel that there is enough proof to be 100% positive that there was secret diplomacy. Pretty darn close though, but I would prefer to error on the side of caution. So this report will be noted.