DaGip/ Continually posting personal info [Settled]

[nagerous]

I have a question, if I claim that LFAW's signature has a personal private picture of me, making love to a beautiful woman, which I did not give him the right to post can I get him a 24+ hr ban without warning too?

[Twill]

I have a question, if I claim that LFAW's signature has a personal private picture of me, making love to a beautiful woman, which I did not give him the right to post can I get him a 24+ hr ban without warning too?

No, I'd call BS on you because I don't think you could get a woman that good looking

Nag, don't push it just to push it.

[daydream]

I have a question, if I claim that LFAW's signature has a personal private picture of me, making love to a beautiful woman, which I did not give him the right to post can I get him a 24+ hr ban without warning too?

No, I'd call BS on you because I don't think you could get a woman that good looking

Nag, don't push it just to push it.

so what was it you were doing then?

oh and dont worry about the sig, vace is changing it as we speak, i have helped him come up with a solution.

[nagerous]

I don't do that badly actually.

I take it I am not going to get an apology for my 24 hour ban then...

[daydream]

I don't do that badly actually.

I take it I am not going to get an apology for my 24 hour ban then...

oh, but didn't you read the heartfelt, earnest and sincere sorry we got from twill:

Hello daydream,

Your Forum Ban has expired.

Comment (from Twill):

Welcome back,

I'm sorry you had to go through that, consider talking with your clan leader about how he chooses to push his agenda.

Please change your signature if you have not already.

Regards,
The Conquer Club

_________________
This is an automatically generated message. Please do not reply.

[jbrettlip]

twill,

LFAW's sig is a picture of SOMEBODY, unless LFAW is two people. I know you did this to "punish" Owen, or show him who is boss, but really as I stated before, the intent should be looked at, not the actual usage. There is personal info all over this forum...hell I have SEEN Obama's birth certificate on this forum. Why don't you reword your rule, to actually encompass what you are trying to accomplish? Otherwise, every quote, every topic about politics, religion, music, and sports would have to dissappear. I don't think that is what you originally intended, so I ask you to take this suggestion under consideration.

Eagerly awaiting your snarky, if you don't like the forum google.com can help you find another one, response.

[Twill]

I have a question, if I claim that LFAW's signature has a personal private picture of me, making love to a beautiful woman, which I did not give him the right to post can I get him a 24+ hr ban without warning too?

No, I'd call BS on you because I don't think you could get a woman that good looking

Nag, don't push it just to push it.

so what was it you were doing then?

I took it exactly as far as Owen asked me to. He wanted a ridiculous interpretation of the rule, so he got it, and everything that went with it.

If he is going to bitch and moan and PM 5 mods the same thing he posted here about how we aren't being consistent with the enforcement of the rules, then we need to be consistent, no?

Again, sorry you got caught up in it, but your clan leader pushed it too far and yes, what I did was petty and over the top, but owen has never listened to us. Maybe he will listen to you.

oh and dont worry about the sig, vace is changing it as we speak, i have helped him come up with a solution.

I wasn't worried, Owen was...but this should be good, I quite look forward to it.

[jbrettlip]

Any chance of some feedback on my post, Mr. twill?

[nagerous]

Any chance of some feedback on my post, Mr. twill?

I doubt it, I got a PM saying I was being intentionally annoying by suggesting such a thing.

[Twill]

Any chance of some feedback on my post, Mr. twill?

sure, just hadn't gotten there yet.

twill,

LFAW's sig is a picture of SOMEBODY, unless LFAW is two people. I know you did this to "punish" Owen, or show him who is boss, but really as I stated before, the intent should be looked at, not the actual usage. There is personal info all over this forum...hell I have SEEN Obama's birth certificate on this forum. Why don't you reword your rule, to actually encompass what you are trying to accomplish? Otherwise, every quote, every topic about politics, religion, music, and sports would have to dissappear. I don't think that is what you originally intended, so I ask you to take this suggestion under consideration.

Again, you're taking the rule too far. The wording of the rule (in 2 places in the community guidelines) is this:

Don't ever post personal information of other users. Anywhere. Ever. Even if they already posted it somewhere else. This includes posting personal information about a CC user on another site, you will be held accountable here.

# Attacking a person instead of the user is NOT ok - it's all fun and games until it becomes personal.

* Using a person's real information, picture, address, blog or anything else "personal" is NOT ok.

Both places it refers to the personal information of people who are users on this site. If you are quoting, reposting or otherwise using content that was created by a user, then that's fine - it does not link back to the person using that account and the two lives can be kept separate. However, if you post anything about the person who controls that user, that implicitly or explicitly links a real person to a fictitious user, then you have crossed a line.

Obama's birth certificate doesn't fall under this rule because, sadly, Obama doesn't have an account here (that I know of). The two people in LFAW's sig are, probably, not users here, and even if they are, that image is completely anonymous.

I'd argue that Owen's "photo" is not even personal info because it would be virtually impossible to identify owen in a crowd from that image because it has been manipulated so far and has no reference point on the site with which to link it to an actual photograph of him - but then, would Owen really have accepted that as an acceptable outcome? No, because he didn't accept it when Gip changed his avatar, he still wanted the ban.

The rule is very clearly stated, and intended, to prevent users from posting any content, with or without permission, that could link a user to a person. Every person who uses this site has the right to be in direct control of their own information at all times, as soon as it is in the hands of another person, it is out of their direct control.

Eagerly awaiting your snarky, if you don't like the forum google.com can help you find another one, response.

But it's oh so true. especially when you give me the equally snarky "but this information is on google!" remarks.

Any chance of some feedback on my post, Mr. twill?

I doubt it, I got a PM saying I was being intentionally annoying by suggesting such a thing.

The difference is that brett actually had reasoned out points in his post. You just went with ridiculous.

[Twill]

p.s. love the new sig

you guys do wear controversy well.

[Optimus Prime]

The new signature doesn't make sense though...

"The New Controversial Clan Has Ever Seen" appears to be missing something? The sentence doesn't even make sense.

[SirSebstar]

I read CC in that line, so it makes a kinda sense

[Vace Cooper]

The signature is temperary until we figure out what we want to do. I dont think we should have to change it because of the beef between Owen, Dagip, and Twill. This whole thing should be figured out between them. There are plenty of other innocent people posting personal information, who havent received ban's yet, and won't. I don't see why this rule only applies to the Bandits.

Twill, if you were just trying to make a point about Owen's request being ridiculous by banning our clan for a ridiculous reson, then I don't see why we have to take down our signature. If you are serious... Then why is it just us? Im not trying to be a dick, you know i've obeyed your request's in the past. I just feel like the Bandits are being singled out.

[jbrettlip]

Twill,

Thanks for the response. You did clear up a few things for me. So if Obama was on this site, and his username was baracko, I could write: Obama has horrible policies, but I couldn't write baracko has horrible policies.

So I can write Owen (insert real last name here) lives in Austin, TX, and I can't write owenshooter lives in (where he lives).

And I can write This website is owned by (public name of owner) but can't write (owner's user name) owns this site.

So therefore, people can post personal information about random people, as long as it isn't referring to their conquer club user names?

[Twill]

Brett, you can do whatever you want and see where it gets ya mate.

If you approach the rules with common sense, they will approach you with common sense. If you are being intentionally dense about them (which quite frankly we both know you are being right now), then they will be equally dense with you.

And Vace - Owen wanted his picture removed. He can't have it both ways, either it's personal information and gets removed, or it's not and you can use it for your sig. The whole reason you guys can't use it is because DaGip can't use it. You can't say "treat us like everyone else" and "give us special permission to use something that other people can't" in the same breath.

[Vace Cooper]

:roll:

Brett, you can do whatever you want and see where it gets ya mate.

If you approach the rules with common sense, they will approach you with common sense. If you are being intentionally dense about them (which quite frankly we both know you are being right now), then they will be equally dense with you.

And Vace - Owen wanted his picture removed. He can't have it both ways, either it's personal information and gets removed, or it's not and you can use it for your sig. The whole reason you guys can't use it is because DaGip can't use it. You can't say "treat us like everyone else" and "give us special permission to use something that other people can't" in the same breath.

So does this mean we can still use our signature if we just change Owens picture then?

[jbrettlip]

So therefore, people can post personal information about random people, as long as it isn't referring to their conquer club user names?

No I am not trying to be dense about it...I really was sincere about you clearing it up. If I post "My grandmother's name is Amelia." that is fine, since she isn't a user of cc. But I couldn't post jbrettlipgma (if that was a username) name is Amelia.

So John Doe's phone number is 555-1234 is fine as long as I don't link a user to said phone number.

[daydream]

I have a question, if I claim that LFAW's signature has a personal private picture of me, making love to a beautiful woman, which I did not give him the right to post can I get him a 24+ hr ban without warning too?

No, I'd call BS on you because I don't think you could get a woman that good looking

Nag, don't push it just to push it.

so what was it you were doing then?

I took it exactly as far as Owen asked me to. He wanted a ridiculous interpretation of the rule, so he got it, and everything that went with it.

If he is going to bitch and moan and PM 5 mods the same thing he posted here about how we aren't being consistent with the enforcement of the rules, then we need to be consistent, no?

Again, sorry you got caught up in it, but your clan leader pushed it too far and yes, what I did was petty and over the top, but owen has never listened to us. Maybe he will listen to you.

we do not intend to try and restrict owen in anything he does.
i have another point that goes right here, but it also fits another of your quotes, so look for it a bit further down in this post.

oh and dont worry about the sig, vace is changing it as we speak, i have helped him come up with a solution.

I wasn't worried, Owen was...but this should be good, I quite look forward to it.

your sarcasm is wasted on me.

:roll:

Brett, you can do whatever you want and see where it gets ya mate.

If you approach the rules with common sense, they will approach you with common sense. If you are being intentionally dense about them (which quite frankly we both know you are being right now), then they will be equally dense with you.

heres my common sense:
the first time around Gip used the image to flame owen.
second time around to troll owen.
we used the image to identify ourselves with each other as a clan.
i'd say the first two reasons are blatantly banworthy... the last one not. DaGip was intentionally trying to piss off owen, and owen was fighting back. You know just as well as i do that DaGip is not a first offender, just like owen or mustard, and that trolling owen by using his pic is absolutely a bannable offense. Had O said "trolling" instead of "using personal information" we could have avoided this fiasco eh?

And Vace - Owen wanted his picture removed. He can't have it both ways, either it's personal information and gets removed, or it's not and you can use it for your sig. The whole reason you guys can't use it is because DaGip can't use it. You can't say "treat us like everyone else" and "give us special permission to use something that other people can't" in the same breath.

see, when owen says one thing, and vace another, thats not vace saying both of them... just fyi.

[owenshooter]

twill... you missed the point and dropped the ball, completely. here is the WRITTEN RULE i was asking about. i choose to use my image within the clan sig, as do all of our members, it does not make the image public for others to use, by your own rules:

Don't ever post personal information of other users. Anywhere. Ever. Even if they already posted it somewhere else. This includes posting personal information about a CC user on another site, you will be held accountable here.

had one of your mods simply stated, his last ban was for "flaming outside of flamewars" by writing "cock sucker" on your image, not for using your image, it would have been settled. but neither of the two i dealt with knew that info. i don't blame them, perhaps that wasn't put in my ban record or on my wrap sheet or whatever. i truly thought he was guilty of the same infraction, as i perceived it. i had no idea he wasn't banned for using my image, but for the "cock sucker" scrawled on it.

i have nothing against the CC mods or admins, and my questions were very clear and based within the written rules i found on the site. once king achilles told me he was going to look into it, and get a clarification of the rule, i was satisfied. and i even told him regardless of the outcome, thanks for your time. wow, a civil discourse with a mod is now spamming him up. ok... that also makes sense. go ahead and make us change our sig, it doesn't matter, it will be a continual reminder of what you did to a bunch of innocent clan members because their leader dared to ask a very civil and well thought out, question. you are still my favorite, and i'm sure we'll laugh about this at another time, but you need to clarify the personal info rules. forcing an entire clan to change a sig, that is not against the rules i have sighted above, is ridiculous. see you on skype!!! the black jesus has spoken...-0

p.s.-wicked and her cronies take down live chat... owen questions a written rule on CC... WE GOT OWEN!!!! public enemy number one is off the streets for another 24 hours!!!!

p.p.s.-still have no idea how i got a 7 day ban for posting about myself in a thread in which i was accused of being a multi... brett did the same thing and got nothing... CC Justice... differen't rules for different people... 2 friends do the same exact thing within a thread, one banned, one left alone...

[Natewolfman]

had one of your mods simply stated, his last ban was for "flaming outside of flamewars" by writing "cock sucker" on your image, not for using your image, it would have been settled.

Just wanted to clear this up. DaGip received a three day forum vacation for flaming owen in a post in the Off Topics forum.

?

[Gypsys Kiss]

The 2nd post of the previous[settled] thread and the 11th post in this one tell you why DaGip bot his ban. Also, you dont ask for a rule clarification , you ask for him to be banned for doing what various other users have done in the past. Either ban 'em all or ban none. You cant pick and choose who to ban.

[owenshooter]

The 2nd post of the previous[settled] thread and the 11th post in this one tell you why DaGip bot his ban. Also, you dont ask for a rule clarification , you ask for him to be banned for doing what various other users have done in the past. Either ban 'em all or ban none. You cant pick and choose who to ban.

he was banned for flaming me by using my image... the image was removed. he RETURNED FROM HIS BAN and put my image back up with a sarcastic "free owen" on it. he was then warned after i asked about it, and removed it. i found it odd that he was previously banned, returned and committed the same offense for a mere warning. i just wanted a clarification. i don't think anyone understands that this is two seperate instances, even twill...-0

[owenshooter]

Epic! Where has the Twill of the last 7 days been all my life? This is great stuff!

banning an entire clan, including many members who have never had a single infraction, without a warning is pretty close to gross abuse of power and well beyond the guidelines i have found for disciplinary measures. so, yes, epic. however, i kept my C&A within the rules and questioned a rule. twill made it personal and went after me and every member of my clan. perhaps they should concentrate on real villains, like wicked taking down live chat, and not people that choose to use their own images within a clan sig. maybe these actions by twill were over the top? actually, that is an understatement...-0

[lancehoch]

he was banned for flaming me by using my image... the image was removed. he RETURNED FROM HIS BAN and put my image back up with a sarcastic "free owen" on it. he was then warned after i asked about it, and removed it. i found it odd that he was previously banned, returned and committed the same offense for a mere warning. i just wanted a clarification. i don't think anyone understands that this is two seperate instances, even twill...-0

Apparently you have not read certain posts in this thread. I will try to make this explicitly clear:

he was banned for flaming me by using my image...

FALSE

Just wanted to clear this up. DaGip received a three day forum vacation for flaming owen in a post in the Off Topics forum.

TRUE
Better?