Moderators: Multi Hunters, Cheating/Abuse Team
eddie2 wrote:Lol read placebo7,s interests
placebo7 wrote:Interests:The player with the less dignity in this game is judge_reinhold. He uses all cheap tactics you can imagine to win a game. He is so desperate for points that he could shell his mother to win...The most pathetic guy i\ve ever seen in net games..So sad
iAmCaffeine wrote:Really, 68%, lmao?! I mean, I know you didn't attempt at making any kind of calculation, but that's dumb.
MagnusGreeol wrote:iAmCaffeine wrote:Really, 68%, lmao?! I mean, I know you didn't attempt at making any kind of calculation, but that's dumb.
- How do you know I didn't pull out calculator,pen,pencil behind the ear?? You live with me<? Please tell me your best calculation Caff.? Or would You say if 3 way play was non existent the % of SD reports would be the same,,Or drop?? And if you say you don't care either way why then would you even post?,,Cuz that would be dumb? '')
-MGM-
iAmCaffeine wrote:MagnusGreeol wrote:iAmCaffeine wrote:Really, 68%, lmao?! I mean, I know you didn't attempt at making any kind of calculation, but that's dumb.
- How do you know I didn't pull out calculator,pen,pencil behind the ear?? You live with me<? Please tell me your best calculation Caff.? Or would You say if 3 way play was non existent the % of SD reports would be the same,,Or drop?? And if you say you don't care either way why then would you even post?,,Cuz that would be dumb? '')
-MGM-
We both know that figure is baseless.
iAmCaffeine wrote:Sure. Let's just remove multiplayer games to completely and secret diplomacy will no longer be an issue. Team games and 1v1 only. Problem solved.
clangfield wrote:iAmCaffeine wrote:Sure. Let's just remove multiplayer games to completely and secret diplomacy will no longer be an issue. Team games and 1v1 only. Problem solved.
Whilst this is true ...
All 4+ no-round-limit non-objective games tend to become 3 player at some stage, so you've got to know how to play with 3 players. There is a way, but I'm not revealing my tactics
MagnusGreeol wrote:- Caff., You mad, angry, upset? I stated a fact, SD% reports would decrease without 3 player, that's all I'm saying.
iAmCaffeine wrote:clangfield wrote:iAmCaffeine wrote:Sure. Let's just remove multiplayer games to completely and secret diplomacy will no longer be an issue. Team games and 1v1 only. Problem solved.
Whilst this is true ...
All 4+ no-round-limit non-objective games tend to become 3 player at some stage, so you've got to know how to play with 3 players. There is a way, but I'm not revealing my tactics
What part of no multiplayer don't you understand?
clangfield wrote:iAmCaffeine wrote:clangfield wrote:iAmCaffeine wrote:Sure. Let's just remove multiplayer games to completely and secret diplomacy will no longer be an issue. Team games and 1v1 only. Problem solved.
Whilst this is true ...
All 4+ no-round-limit non-objective games tend to become 3 player at some stage, so you've got to know how to play with 3 players. There is a way, but I'm not revealing my tactics
What part of no multiplayer don't you understand?
What part of "this it true" don't you understand?
Yes it would solve the problem - it's hard to tell how seriously you are suggesting it, I suspect not very. Regardless, until it happens, I merely make an observation that there is a skill to 3 player situations from which players of games with more contestants would benefit.
iAmCaffeine wrote:Sure. Let's just remove multiplayer games to completely and secret diplomacy will no longer be an issue. Team games and 1v1 only. Problem solved.
t4mcr53s2 wrote:iAmCaffeine wrote:Sure. Let's just remove multiplayer games to completely and secret diplomacy will no longer be an issue. Team games and 1v1 only. Problem solved.
what about when the other guy enlists the neutrals?
TeeGee wrote:with no real evidence being submitted to prove otherwise, I am calling this CLEARED
Users browsing this forum: shoop76