Moderators: Multi Hunters, Cheating/Abuse Team
Culs De Sac wrote:Ok. So this was a four player game in which green and I were fighting for the USA while Red and Yellow were battling out for Russia...Red begins to state that he is being overrun and if he doesnt receive help he will lose control...About 2 turns later yellow eliminates red from the game and has clear control of ALL of Russia...Green decides to shoot up the missile and ask for a truce in order to try and survive..I agree ( IN THE GAME CHAT). At that point green works on the missile while i bombard the premier, launch code and scientist that yellows owns..he had 13-14 troops on these territories as a whole..green then states that i need to help him with bombardment since he has worked on the missile..i go up the missile and bombard yellow...upon weakening yellow...I state in the chat..that yellow cannot win so easily anymore and he would need time to recover so its between me and green to fight... I give him a 2 round warning and then the war continues...at this point green has a reserve stack of about 28 and I of 35-36...green CHOOSES to attack yellow...and I as previously stated attack both green and yellow...at this point me and green go back and forth for a few rounds and I get the best of him..he then states that he has to leave due to wife issues..i proceed to kill him off and then kill yellow..
I have only previously played with avgiannattasio one previous time in which i thought he was irrational and criticized him for it...all plots were laid out in the chat. Nothing illegal occurred. Thank you for your time
BoganGod wrote:- Culs is an honorable and generally skilled player.
- Have played with and against him on many occasions. Alliances if declared are within the rules.
- KING KONQUER the game chat is most amusing, you posting here makes you look cheap, and vindictive.
- Please close pronto mods, clear case of revenge posting
The accused are suspected of:
Other: throwing the game: avgiannattasio clearly said he was going to take his turns to only attack my ME until Culs De Sac could take control of the game. (and kill me and obviously avgiannattasio somewhere before or after that. Too many ands.)This was clearly premeditated as I said that it is throwing the game and explained exactly what could only happen in the end culs de sac would win and obviously gain control that would be impossible to reverse. They continued to cheat until their plan was fully executed. and Starting a sentence with And or But is a big no no. sure enough like I was telling them through my time being kept hostage while they laughed and made jokes, not killing me completely with there game throwing abuse, but keeping me alive to make light of the situation that this is acceptable play for this game This isn't exactly incorrect but he is saying that what they did was perfectly acceptable. I agree when throwing games and keeping people hostage Where are all the commas? is clearly not allowed as I told the 2 when they where commiting committing these acts. I am very disturbed if play such as this is allowed to continue on this sight Site. Sight is for seeing.. much less the verbal abuse dished out in undercover style. You mean subtly as opposed to openly like yours?
King Sam wrote: Vindictive & Spurious reports are reports that are made for spiteful reasons. For example I will use ronc in my situation, cause everyone loves to hate ronc...lol..
Ron and I get in a dispute in a game because I held a bonus and he came after me instead of someone else in the game. i get mad. I decide to get even by finding ways to report ronc for abuse so I can get vindication for the wrong that I thought he did to me.
Its very easy to spot a vindictive/spurious report cause usually not only will the report hold no merit but you can easily see it was initiated from a quarrel between the poster and the accused in some facet of the site. And usually the offense they are being accused of doing is something completely different from the interaction that the 2 had together. Another easy spot is seeing someone get Warned for an offense on the site and instead of taking the Warning and heeding it they turn it around and try their best to involve others in their mistakes by creating reports.
Snowgun wrote:King Sam wrote: Vindictive & Spurious reports are reports that are made for spiteful reasons. For example I will use ronc in my situation, cause everyone loves to hate ronc...lol..
Ron and I get in a dispute in a game because I held a bonus and he came after me instead of someone else in the game. i get mad. I decide to get even by finding ways to report ronc for abuse so I can get vindication for the wrong that I thought he did to me.
Its very easy to spot a vindictive/spurious report cause usually not only will the report hold no merit but you can easily see it was initiated from a quarrel between the poster and the accused in some facet of the site. And usually the offense they are being accused of doing is something completely different from the interaction that the 2 had together. Another easy spot is seeing someone get Warned for an offense on the site and instead of taking the Warning and heeding it they turn it around and try their best to involve others in their mistakes by creating reports.
This Definition from the great KS shows how much of a vindictive and spurious report this is.
1. King got mad a culs for gameplay and wanted to get even.
2. King started with crying "throwing a game", then "multi", and finally "holding hostage", then back to "throwing a game"
THORNHEART wrote:King Konquer is a tool...I recommend foeing him
i cant ever belive culs would need to cheat to win.
KING KONQUER wrote:hey all the clueless people out there. its not a truce there is no chance at all for green to have won that game and blue was clearly going to win as green threw away all chances just to stop me. nobody in there right mind can say otherwise. so you guys just sound ridiculous. its clearly throwing the game. that's not a truce if you have no chance in hell after. I said it before the game ended and then it happened cause its not a truce when you give someone the game. use your brain people..green never had a sniff at winning.
KING KONQUER wrote:hey all the clueless people out there. its not a truce there is no chance at all for green to have won that game and blue was clearly going to win as green threw away all chances just to stop me. nobody in there right mind can say otherwise. so you guys just sound ridiculous. its clearly throwing the game. that's not a truce if you have no chance in hell after. I said it before the game ended and then it happened cause its not a truce when you give someone the game. use your brain people..green never had a sniff at winning.
BoganGod wrote:A truce is a truce whether you have a sniff of winning or not. Quit your crying. Your sour grapes are not pretty. You lost. Man up. Play another game, get over it. No rules were broken. You spurious post is the only infraction/wrong doing in the whole sorry, funny saga
KING KONQUER wrote:okay then i think i have enough confirmation that some people in games with me will have no chance, there goes everyman for themself! no one will win but me or who i choose to give the game to. thats how you all like these games to go. cool!
Users browsing this forum: No registered users