Conquer Club

screwyjewy85, dicknose85 [cleared]

All previously decided cases. Please check here before opening a new case.

Moderators: Multi Hunters, Cheating/Abuse Team

Forum rules
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.

[These cases have been closed. If you would like to appeal the decision of the hunter please open a ticket on the help page and the case will be looked into by a second hunter.]

screwyjewy85, dicknose85 [cleared]

Postby loopinvariant on Tue Oct 23, 2007 9:29 am

These are suspected Multis & Secret Alliance (both)

Suspect users: screwyjewy85, dicknose85

Game number: http://www.conquerclub.com/game.php?game=1059809

Comments: Entered a standard game as a secret alliance, admitted it after moving. Have a history of playing many games with and against only each other. Admitted both accounts are in the same house.


loopinvariant

edit: title to conform to form
Corporal 1st Class loopinvariant
 
Posts: 76
Joined: Sun May 06, 2007 4:27 pm

Postby sully800 on Tue Oct 23, 2007 9:06 pm

So they know each other and entered the game with intent to ally...

I'll have to get back to you on that one!
User avatar
Major sully800
 
Posts: 4978
Joined: Wed Jun 14, 2006 5:45 pm
Location: Bethlehem, Pennsylvania

Postby wicked on Wed Oct 24, 2007 6:55 pm

(Just a general statement, I haven't looked at this game)

Predetermined alliances have never been against the rules so long as they're announced PRIOR to happening.
User avatar
Major wicked
 
Posts: 15787
Joined: Thu Jan 26, 2006 1:23 pm

Postby loopinvariant on Wed Oct 24, 2007 7:19 pm

wicked wrote:(Just a general statement, I haven't looked at this game)

Predetermined alliances have never been against the rules so long as they're announced PRIOR to happening.


They didn't announce until after they moved, and with the number of games they have in common (including just against each other) I'd like to verify it is n't a multi.
Corporal 1st Class loopinvariant
 
Posts: 76
Joined: Sun May 06, 2007 4:27 pm

Postby loopinvariant on Wed Oct 31, 2007 10:44 am

Is there an update on this yet?
Corporal 1st Class loopinvariant
 
Posts: 76
Joined: Sun May 06, 2007 4:27 pm

Postby loopinvariant on Sun Nov 04, 2007 3:15 pm

sully800 wrote:So they know each other and entered the game with intent to ally...

I'll have to get back to you on that one!


I guess this was sarcasm and there is no intent to investigate this. I've seen several multi/secret alliance reports originate and be resolved in the 11 days since I posted the complaint.

If you have no intent on investigating, just say so. It is not just me waiting and watching this, but the two people who are reported.

Either investigate it or don't, but don't leave a report dangling for 11 days while newer reports are being resolved.
Corporal 1st Class loopinvariant
 
Posts: 76
Joined: Sun May 06, 2007 4:27 pm

Postby king achilles on Mon Nov 05, 2007 5:11 am

Please have a little more patience with this case. I have also looked into this and currently, we still need more evidence to conclude if they are multi accounts or not.

Until these two accounts starts playing games again, this will remain pending.
Last edited by king achilles on Wed Nov 07, 2007 10:33 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class king achilles
Support Admin
Support Admin
 
Posts: 13261
Joined: Wed Jun 13, 2007 10:55 pm

Postby loopinvariant on Mon Nov 05, 2007 10:13 am

king achilles wrote:Please have a little more patience with this case. I have also looked into this and currently, we still need more evidence to conclude if they are multi accounts or not.


Thanks for the update, it is much appreciated. With the generally informal & sometimes irreverent tone of the CC message forums it can be hard to tell what is going on sometimes.
Corporal 1st Class loopinvariant
 
Posts: 76
Joined: Sun May 06, 2007 4:27 pm

Postby sully800 on Thu Nov 08, 2007 7:59 pm

Official ruling: If it happens once or twice, its okay but for most people it would certainly be grounds for negative feedback and maybe the ignore list.

If players do this many times, especially in three player games (forming an alliance against the third person from the start) it would be considered gross abuse and would warrant a block.

In this specific case the alliance was announced before anyone else had a chance to play. The fact that it was after the first turn doesn't really matter, it was still an alliance announced from the start.
User avatar
Major sully800
 
Posts: 4978
Joined: Wed Jun 14, 2006 5:45 pm
Location: Bethlehem, Pennsylvania


Return to Closed C&A Reports

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users